THE COAST EFFECT RESPONSE IN GEOMAGNETIC-FIELD MEASUREMENTS

被引:30
|
作者
DOSSO, HW
MENG, ZW
机构
[1] Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Victoria, Victoria
关键词
D O I
10.1016/0031-9201(92)90159-S
中图分类号
P3 [地球物理学]; P59 [地球化学];
学科分类号
0708 ; 070902 ;
摘要
Two-dimensional (2D) numerical models of electromagnetic (EM) induction for anomalous conductors in continental and island coastal regions are studied to determine constraints on ocean-conductor separation distances that would permit, to within an acceptable approximation, a simple vector subtraction of the coast effect response. The anomalous conductors are in the form of an upwelling or a depression in the asthenospheric conductive substratum at depth. The coast effect response range (Y(R)) is arbitrarily taken to be the distance from the ocean at which the \B(z)/B(yn)\ coast effect response is reduced to a value of 0.2. The response ranges are determined and presented empirically as a function of period for a range of conductive substratum depths, island widths, and ocean depths. The response ranges are tested in 2D numerical models that include an anomalous conductor in the form of either an upwelling or a depression in the conductive substratum under the ocean and host Earth. The induction arrows for the anomalous conductor are shown to be in good agreement with the difference arrows obtained by subtracting the responses of a model without the anomalous conductor from the responses of the model that includes the anomalous conductor. As an application, difference arrows, obtained by subtracting three-dimensional laboratory analogue model coast effect responses from field site responses, are employed in the interpretation of induction arrow responses available for a number of sites in the Bohai Bay region of China and the Kii Peninsula region of Japan.
引用
收藏
页码:39 / 56
页数:18
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Preliminary Measurements of Geomagnetic-field Variations in Slovenia
    Cop, Rudi
    Dezeljin, Damir
    Mihajlovic, Spomenko J.
    Kosovac, Pavel
    [J]. ELEKTROTEHNISKI VESTNIK-ELECTROCHEMICAL REVIEW, 2011, 78 (03): : 96 - 101
  • [2] TESTS OF CRYOGENIC SQUID FOR GEOMAGNETIC-FIELD MEASUREMENTS
    ZIMMERMAN, JE
    CAMPBELL, WH
    [J]. GEOPHYSICS, 1975, 40 (02) : 269 - 284
  • [3] SOLSTITIAL AND HEMISPHERICAL ASYMMETRY IN THE RESPONSE OF GEOMAGNETIC-FIELD
    SHAH, GN
    KAUL, RK
    KAUL, CL
    RAZDAN, H
    MERRYFIELD, WJ
    WILCOX, JM
    [J]. JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-SPACE PHYSICS, 1984, 89 (NA1): : 295 - 300
  • [4] DIFFERENTIAL GEOMAGNETIC-FIELD MEASUREMENTS AT EDGE OF DENVER BASIN
    BRILL, R
    [J]. TRANSACTIONS-AMERICAN GEOPHYSICAL UNION, 1974, 55 (04): : 229 - 229
  • [5] PRECISION OF GEOMAGNETIC-FIELD MEASUREMENTS IN A TECTONICALLY ACTIVE REGION
    JOHNSTON, MJS
    MUELLER, RJ
    WARE, RH
    DAVIS, PM
    [J]. JOURNAL OF GEOMAGNETISM AND GEOELECTRICITY, 1984, 36 (03): : 83 - 95
  • [6] DIFFERENTIAL GEOMAGNETIC-FIELD MEASUREMENTS AT EDGE OF DENVER BASIN
    BRILL, R
    [J]. JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH, 1975, 80 (11): : 1593 - 1599
  • [7] SPATIAL POWER SPECTRA OF THE CRUSTAL GEOMAGNETIC-FIELD AND CORE GEOMAGNETIC-FIELD
    MCLEOD, MG
    COLEMAN, PJ
    [J]. PHYSICS OF THE EARTH AND PLANETARY INTERIORS, 1980, 23 (02) : P5 - P19
  • [8] GEOMAGNETIC-FIELD INVERSIONS
    PETROVA, GN
    [J]. GEOMAGNETIZM I AERONOMIYA, 1987, 27 (02): : 177 - 196
  • [9] REVERSALS OF GEOMAGNETIC-FIELD
    DRISCOLL, RB
    [J]. BULLETIN OF THE AMERICAN PHYSICAL SOCIETY, 1976, 21 (11): : 1307 - 1307
  • [10] ON SENSITIVITY OF BIOLOGICAL OBJECTS TO THE GEOMAGNETIC-FIELD EFFECT
    ZINCHENKO, SY
    DANILOV, VI
    [J]. BIOFIZIKA, 1992, 37 (04): : 636 - 642