Comparison of Postoperative Results of One Day Laser-assisted in-situ Keratomileusis, Laser-assisted Sub-epithelial Keratectomy Surgery, and Conventional Surgery

被引:1
|
作者
Kim, Wook Kyum [1 ]
Ryu, Ik Hee [1 ]
Lee, In Sik [1 ]
Kim, Hee Sun [1 ]
Kim, Jung Sub [1 ]
Kim, Jin Kuk [1 ]
机构
[1] B&VIIt Eye Ctr, 411 Seocho Daero, Seoul 06615, South Korea
来源
关键词
Eye tracking; Laser-assisted in-situ keratomileusis (LASIK); Laser-assisted sub-epithelial keratectomy (LASEK); One day operation; Pupil;
D O I
10.3341/jkos.2018.59.5.410
中图分类号
R77 [眼科学];
学科分类号
100212 ;
摘要
Purpose: To evaluate the postoperative results of one day laser-assisted in-situ keratomileusis (LASIK) or laser-assisted sub-epithelial keratectomy (LASEK) procedures, which were performed on the same day as preoperative examinations, including fundus examinations after dilating the pupil. Methods: This study included 226 LASIK patients (226 eyes) and 201 LASEK patients (201 eyes) who underwent surgery with Visumax and EX500 from January to December in 2016. We divided the patients into two groups. The one-day surgery group (one-day group) underwent surgery on the same day as preoperative examinations, including dilated fundus examinations. The scheduled surgery group (scheduled group) underwent surgery on the scheduled day after the preoperative examinations. In the one-day group, the surgery was usually performed 2-5 hours after instillation of the pupil dilating eye drops. Results: Among LASIK patients, the one-day group included 109 patients and the scheduled group included 117 patients. The postoperative myopic errors were 0.06 +/- 0.37 diopters (D) and 0.07 +/- 0.36 D, respectively (p = 0.91). The postoperative astigmatism was -0.38 +/- 0.24 D and -0.37 +/- 0.24 D, respectively (p = 0.77). The postoperative uncorrected visual acuity was -0.05 +/- 0.03 logMAR and -0.06 +/- 0.03 logMAR, respectively (p = 0.13). Among LASEK patients, the one-day group included 107 patients and the scheduled group included 94 patients. The postoperative myopic error was 0.18 +/- 0.52 D and 0.22 +/- 0.54 D, respectively (p = 0.95). The postoperative astigmatism was -0.48 +/- 0.30 D and -0.46 +/- 0.29 D, respectively (p = 0.14). The postoperative uncorrected visual acuity was -0.05 +/- 0.03 logMAR and -0.06 +/- 0.03 logMAR, respectively (p = 0.33). Conclusions: The postoperative results of the one-day LASIK and LASEK patients, whose surgery was performed on the same day as the preoperative examinations, were not significantly different from those using the conventional method.
引用
收藏
页码:410 / 418
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Laser-assisted subepithelial keratectomy (LASEK) versus laser-assisted in-situ keratomileusis (LASIK) for correcting myopia
    Kuryan, Jocelyn
    Cheema, Anjum
    Chuck, Roy S.
    [J]. COCHRANE DATABASE OF SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS, 2017, (02):
  • [2] Pterygium after hyperopic laser-assisted sub-epithelial keratomileusis (LASEK)
    O'Brart, David P. S.
    Williams, Katherine
    [J]. CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL OPTOMETRY, 2013, 96 (03) : 336 - 338
  • [3] Laser-assisted subepithelial keratectomy retreatment after laser in situ keratomileusis
    Saeed, Ayman
    O'Doherty, Maeve
    O'Doherty, John
    O'Keefe, Michael
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CATARACT AND REFRACTIVE SURGERY, 2008, 34 (10): : 1736 - 1741
  • [4] Advances in technologies for laser-assisted in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) surgery
    Maldonado, Miguel J.
    Nieto, Juan C.
    Pinero, David P.
    [J]. EXPERT REVIEW OF MEDICAL DEVICES, 2008, 5 (02) : 209 - 229
  • [5] Allergic complications with laser-assisted in-situ keratomileusis
    Bielory, Brett P.
    O'Brien, Terrence P.
    [J]. CURRENT OPINION IN ALLERGY AND CLINICAL IMMUNOLOGY, 2011, 11 (05) : 483 - 491
  • [6] Effect of repositioning or discarding the epithelial flap in laser-assisted subepithelial keratectomy and epithelial laser in situ keratomileusis
    Taneri, Suphi
    Oehler, Saskia
    Koch, Joerg
    Azar, Dimitri
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CATARACT AND REFRACTIVE SURGERY, 2011, 37 (10): : 1832 - 1846
  • [7] Corneal Keloid Case after Laser-assisted in-situ Keratomileusis Surgery in Korea
    Kim, Joong Hee
    Park, Yuli
    Cho, Kyong Jin
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE KOREAN OPHTHALMOLOGICAL SOCIETY, 2020, 61 (11): : 1364 - 1367
  • [8] Update on contraindications for laser-assisted in situ keratomileusis and photorefractive keratectomy
    Bower, Kraig S.
    Woreta, Fasika
    [J]. CURRENT OPINION IN OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2014, 25 (04) : 251 - 257
  • [9] Laser-assisted subepithelial keratectomy retreatment surgery
    McAlinden, Colm
    Moore, Jonathan
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CATARACT AND REFRACTIVE SURGERY, 2011, 37 (02): : 358 - 363
  • [10] Laser-assisted in-situ keratomileusis (LASIK) versus photorefractive keratectomy (PRK) for myopia
    Shortt, Alex J.
    Allan, Bruce D. S.
    Evans, Jennifer R.
    [J]. COCHRANE DATABASE OF SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS, 2013, (01):