Corporate governance and firm risk

被引:56
|
作者
Mathew, Sudha [1 ]
Ibrahim, Salma [2 ]
Archbold, Stuart [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Westminster, Dept Accounting Finance & Governance, London, England
[2] Kingston Univ, Res, Kingston, England
[3] Kingston Univ, Dept Finance Accounting & Informat, Kingston, England
关键词
Corporate governance; Firm risk; Governance index; Board attributes;
D O I
10.1108/CG-02-2017-0024
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Purpose - This study aims to explore the relationship between board governance structure and firm risk. In particular, this study develops a "governance index" based on four aspects of the board: board composition, board leadership structure, board member characteristics and board processes, and it examines how the overall index relates to firmrisk. Design/methodology/approach - The study is conducted using a sample of 268 UK firms from the FTSE 350 index over the period from 2005 to 2010. An index is constructed to capture the overall governance structure of the firm. Regressions of the index on three risk measures are examined. Findings - This study finds that the governance index that aggregates the four sets of board attributes is significantly and negatively related to firmrisk. Robustness tests confirmthis result. Research limitations/implications - A large number of studies have explored the relationship between the attributes of corporate boards and firm performance with mixed results. A much smaller number of studies have looked at board attributes and firm risk, but these have either focused on financial sector firms alone or have included only a single or a limited number of attributes. This study, using a broad agency framework, seeks to extend the work on firmrisk and board attributes by both expanding industry sectors examined and using a comprehensive set of board attributes. Originality value - The findings have policy and practical implications for investors, regulators and chairmen of boards of governors to the extent that they inform these constituencies about the set of board attributes that are associated with firm risk. This study is the first to use a comprehensive measure of governance and relate it to firmrisk.
引用
收藏
页码:52 / 67
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Firm risk and performance: the role of corporate governance
    Chang, Chen-Shan
    Yu, Shang-Wu
    Hung, Cheng-Huang
    [J]. REVIEW OF MANAGERIAL SCIENCE, 2015, 9 (01) : 141 - 173
  • [2] Firm risk and performance: the role of corporate governance
    Chen-Shan Chang
    Shang-Wu Yu
    Cheng-Huang Hung
    [J]. Review of Managerial Science, 2015, 9 : 141 - 173
  • [3] The joint effect of corporate risk disclosure and corporate governance on firm value
    Haj-Salem, Issal
    Damak Ayadi, Salma
    Hussainey, Khaled
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF DISCLOSURE AND GOVERNANCE, 2020, 17 (2-3) : 123 - 140
  • [4] The joint effect of corporate risk disclosure and corporate governance on firm value
    Issal Haj-Salem
    Salma Damak Ayadi
    Khaled Hussainey
    [J]. International Journal of Disclosure and Governance, 2020, 17 : 123 - 140
  • [5] Corporate governance, firm risk and firm performance: the moderating role of group affiliation
    Jha, Ratish Kumar
    Kalita, Niva
    Tiwari, Reshma Kumari
    [J]. ASIAN REVIEW OF ACCOUNTING, 2024,
  • [6] Corporate governance, firm value and risk: Past, present, and future
    Balachandran, Balasingham
    Faff, Robert
    [J]. PACIFIC-BASIN FINANCE JOURNAL, 2015, 35 : 1 - 12
  • [7] Corporate governance and firm diversification
    Anderson, RC
    Bates, TW
    Bizjak, JM
    Lemmon, ML
    [J]. FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT, 2000, 29 (01) : 5 - 22
  • [8] Corporate governance and firm performance
    Bhagat, Sanjai
    Bolton, Brian
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CORPORATE FINANCE, 2008, 14 (03) : 257 - 273
  • [9] Corporate Governance and Firm Survival
    Goktan, M. Sinan
    Kieschnick, Robert
    Moussawi, Rabih
    [J]. FINANCIAL REVIEW, 2018, 53 (02) : 209 - 253
  • [10] Corporate Governance and Firm Performance
    Chaghadari, Masood Fooladi
    [J]. SOCIALITY AND ECONOMICS DEVELOPMENT, 2011, 10 : 484 - 489