Medical and surgical ward rounds in teaching hospitals of Kuwait University: students' perceptions

Background: Teaching sessions for medical students during ward rounds are an essential component of bedside teaching, providing students with the opportunity to regard patients as actual people, and to observe their physical conditions directly, allowing a better understanding of illnesses to be developed. We aim to explore medical students' perceptions regarding medical and surgical ward rounds within the Faculty of Medicine at Kuwait University, and to evaluate whether this teaching activity is meeting the expectation of learners. Methods: A pretested questionnaire was used to collect data from 141medical students during the 2012-2013 academic year. They were asked to provide their current and expected ratings about competencies that were supposed to be gained during ward rounds, on a scale from 1 (lowest) to 5 (highest). Mean scores were calculated, and the Student t-test was used to compare results. P < 0.05 was the cut-off level for significance. Results: Only 17students (12.1%) declined to participate in the study. The students' current competency scores (for competencies taught within both disciplines - medical and surgical) were significantly lower than the scores indicating students' expectations (P < 0.001). The best-taught competency was bedside examination, in both medical (mean: 3.45) and surgical (mean: 3.05) ward rounds. However, medical ward rounds were better than surgical rounds in covering some competencies, especially the teaching of professional attitude and approach towards patients (P, 0.001). Conclusion: Both medical and surgical ward rounds were deficient in meeting the students' expectations. Medical educators should utilize the available literature to improve the bedside teaching experience for their students.