A comparative study of carbon footprint and assessment standards

被引:77
|
作者
Gao, Tao [1 ]
Liu, Qing [1 ]
Wang, Jianping [1 ]
机构
[1] China Univ Min & Technol, Sch Mech & Civil Engn, Inst Project Management, Xuzhou, Peoples R China
关键词
carbon footprint; carbon emissions; assessment standards; comparative study;
D O I
10.1093/ijlct/ctt041
中图分类号
O414.1 [热力学];
学科分类号
摘要
This paper focuses on the research methods and steps involved in carrying out studies on different types of carbon footprints. Furthermore, a comparative study of different carbon footprint assessment standards was carried out to identify their similarities, differences and deficiencies. Goals, principles, research boundaries, calculation methods, data selection and other aspects of organizations footprint and product carbon footprint were analysed, respectively. Organizations carbon footprint assessment standards-ISO14064 and Greenhouse Gas (GHG) protocol and product carbon footprint assessment standards-PAS2050, TSQ0010, ISO14047 and Product and Supply Chain GHG Protocol were analysed comparatively. The selection of GHG, system settings, quantification and carbon footprint, selection of date and treatment of specific emissions are the most important part of the study of the carbon footprint and assessment standards, especially for organizations and products. Guidelines had been made on these issues from existing assessment standards, but further improvement is still needed.
引用
收藏
页码:237 / 243
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Comparative carbon footprint assessment of agricultural and tourist locations in Thailand
    Hong Anh Thi Nguyen
    Gheewala, Shabbir H.
    Sophea, Tip
    Areerob, Thanita
    Hashimoto, Kiyota
    Pimonsree, Sittichai
    Prueksakorn, Kritana
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2020, 269
  • [2] Carbon Footprint of Different Kinds of Footwear - a Comparative Study
    Serweta, Wioleta
    Gajewski, Robert
    Olszewski, Piotr
    Zapatero, Alberto
    Lawinska, Katarzyna
    [J]. FIBRES & TEXTILES IN EASTERN EUROPE, 2019, 27 (05) : 94 - 99
  • [3] THE COMPARATIVE STUDY FOR CARBON FOOTPRINT OF REFRIGERATORS IN LIFE CYCLE
    Lim, Noh-Hyun
    Kim, Jongsek
    Kim, Jin Wook
    [J]. FRESENIUS ENVIRONMENTAL BULLETIN, 2021, 30 (04): : 3496 - 3501
  • [4] Environmental footprint assessment of building structures: A comparative study
    Sinha, Rajib
    Lennartsson, Maria
    Frostell, Bjorn
    [J]. BUILDING AND ENVIRONMENT, 2016, 104 : 162 - 171
  • [5] Moving Forward on Product Carbon Footprint Standards
    Draucker, Laura
    Kaufman, Scott
    ter Kuile, Robert
    Meinrenken, Christoph
    [J]. JOURNAL OF INDUSTRIAL ECOLOGY, 2011, 15 (02) : 169 - 171
  • [6] Measurement of the Ecological and Carbon Footprint in Port Authorities Comparative Study
    Mateo-Mantecon, Ingrid
    Coto-Millan, Pablo
    Domenech, Juan L.
    Angel Pesquera-Gonzalez, Miguel
    [J]. TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH RECORD, 2011, (2222) : 80 - 84
  • [7] Carbon footprint of milk production in Brazil: a comparative case study
    de Leis, Cristiane Maria
    Cherubini, Edivan
    Ruviaro, Clandio Favarini
    da Silva, Vamilson Prudencio
    Lampert, Vinicius do Nascimento
    Spies, Airton
    Soares, Sebastiao Roberto
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LIFE CYCLE ASSESSMENT, 2015, 20 (01): : 46 - 60
  • [8] Carbon footprint of milk production in Brazil: a comparative case study
    Cristiane Maria de Léis
    Edivan Cherubini
    Clandio Favarini Ruviaro
    Vamilson Prudêncio da Silva
    Vinícius do Nascimento Lampert
    Airton Spies
    Sebastião Roberto Soares
    [J]. The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 2015, 20 : 46 - 60
  • [9] Comparison of product carbon footprint standards with a case study on poinsettia (Euphorbia pulcherrima)
    Soode, Eveli
    Weber-Blaschke, Gabriele
    Richter, Klaus
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LIFE CYCLE ASSESSMENT, 2013, 18 (07): : 1280 - 1290
  • [10] Comparison of product carbon footprint standards with a case study on poinsettia (Euphorbia pulcherrima)
    Eveli Soode
    Gabriele Weber-Blaschke
    Klaus Richter
    [J]. The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 2013, 18 : 1280 - 1290