AN EQUILIBRIUM ROUTE CHOICE MODEL WITH EXPLICIT TREATMENT OF THE EFFECT OF INTERSECTIONS

被引:38
|
作者
MENEGUZZER, C
机构
[1] Istituto di Strade e Trasporti, University of Padova, 35131 Padova
关键词
D O I
10.1016/0191-2615(95)00011-2
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
This paper describes the implementation of a framework for incorporating detailed models of intersection operation into a user-optimal route choice model. It is assumed that signal settings are Row-responsive; this yields a combined route choice-intersection control problem, which is formulated as a non-separable network equilibrium problem with asymmetric cost functions. Such cost functions represent delays incurred by vehicles at intersections under various types of control (signalized, major/minor priority and all-way stop), and are based on an approach to capacity analysis widely used in traffic engineering practice, namely the methodologies of the 1985 Highway Capacity Manual and related amendments. The combined route choice-control problem is solved using a diagonalization algorithm; computational tests carried out on a real network indicate that the algorithm converges to a user equilibrium consistent with the control policy, despite violation of the sufficient conditions for convergence. The application also provides empirical evidence that the values of signal timing parameters, which are usually chosen solely on the basis of traffic engineering considerations, may have a substantial impact on the equilibration pattern. Finally, numerical experiments carried out to test the model for solution uniqueness suggest that 'reasonably' close equilibrium Row patterns arise starting from greatly different initial solutions. The modelling framework described in this paper could be typically applied in urban road networks for the assessment of alternative intersection control strategies, or, more generally, to carry out detailed traffic analyses and forecasts for the evaluation of TSM options.
引用
收藏
页码:329 / 356
页数:28
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Route choice in spider monkeys: A spatially explicit model using GIS.
    Suarez, SA
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL ANTHROPOLOGY, 2003, : 203 - 204
  • [2] q-Generalized logit route choice and network equilibrium model
    Nakayama, Shoichiro
    [J]. 20TH INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON TRANSPORTATION AND TRAFFIC THEORY (ISTTT 2013), 2013, 80 : 753 - 763
  • [3] RISK ROUTE CHOICE ANALYSIS AND THE EQUILIBRIUM MODEL UNDER ANTICIPATED REGRET THEORY
    Yuan, Pengcheng
    Juan, Zhicai
    [J]. PROMET-TRAFFIC & TRANSPORTATION, 2014, 26 (01): : 33 - 43
  • [4] Stochastic User Equilibrium for Route Choice Model Based on Random Regret Minimization
    Bekhor, Shlomo
    Chorus, Caspar
    Toledo, Tomer
    [J]. TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH RECORD, 2012, (2284) : 100 - 108
  • [5] The effect of the price of gasoline on the urban economy: From route choice to general equilibrium
    Anas, Alex
    Hiramatsu, Tomoru
    [J]. TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH PART A-POLICY AND PRACTICE, 2012, 46 (06) : 855 - 873
  • [6] Pedestrian Route Choice by Iterated Equilibrium Search
    Kretz, Tobias
    Lehmann, Karsten
    Hofsaess, Ingmar
    [J]. TRAFFIC AND GRANULAR FLOW '13, 2015, : 47 - 54
  • [7] A multi-modal network equilibrium model with captive mode choice and path size logit route choice
    Wang, Guangchao
    Chen, Anthony
    Kitthamkesorn, Songyot
    Ryu, Seungkyu
    Qi, Hang
    Song, Ziqi
    Song, Jianguo
    [J]. TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH PART A-POLICY AND PRACTICE, 2020, 136 : 293 - 317
  • [8] New Formulations of the Stochastic User Equilibrium with Logit Route Choice as an Extension of the Deterministic Model
    Gentile, Guido
    [J]. TRANSPORTATION SCIENCE, 2018, 52 (06) : 1531 - 1547
  • [9] A reserve capacity model of optimal signal control with user-equilibrium route choice
    Gao, ZY
    Song, YF
    [J]. TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH PART B-METHODOLOGICAL, 2002, 36 (04) : 313 - 323
  • [10] Traffic equilibrium in a network model of parking and route choice, with search circuits and cruising flows
    Leurent, Fabien
    Boujnah, Houda
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF EWGT 2012 - 15TH MEETING OF THE EURO WORKING GROUP ON TRANSPORTATION, 2012, 54 : 808 - 821