COMPARISON OF 2 SAMPLING METHODS FOR DETERMINING FORMALDEHYDE CONCENTRATIONS IN WORKPLACE AIR

被引:0
|
作者
KUCHENBECKER, D
GRAU, H
SCHAFFERNICHT, H
机构
来源
STAUB REINHALTUNG DER LUFT | 1993年 / 53卷 / 04期
关键词
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Two sampling methods for formaldehyde were tested simultaneously under laboratory and workplace conditions in the institute for pathology of the University Leipzig. The first method (DFG-method) makes use of a silicagel tube to collect formaldehyde from the air. The second method (TGL-standard) consists in separating the water-soluble formaldehyde from the contaminated air. On account of the fact that the degree of desorption of formaldehyde from silicagel is 0.96, it can be stated that the formaldehyde concentrations determined by means of the two sampling methods are equivalent. The analysis of formaldehyde adsorbed on silicagel is more time consuming. However, tubes containing solid adsorbents should be used for personal sampling at workplaces where employees have to move a lot.
引用
收藏
页码:143 / 145
页数:3
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] WORKPLACE AIR SAMPLING AND POLAROGRAPHIC-DETERMINATION OF FORMALDEHYDE
    SEPTON, JC
    KU, JC
    [J]. AMERICAN INDUSTRIAL HYGIENE ASSOCIATION JOURNAL, 1982, 43 (11): : 845 - 852
  • [2] SAMPLING FOR FORMALDEHYDE IN WORKPLACE AND AMBIENT AIR ENVIRONMENTS - ADDITIONAL LABORATORY AND FIELD VERIFICATION OF A PASSIVE AIR MONITORING BADGE WITH CONVENTIONAL SAMPLING METHODS
    KRING, EV
    [J]. ABSTRACTS OF PAPERS OF THE AMERICAN CHEMICAL SOCIETY, 1983, 186 (AUG): : 21 - CHAS
  • [3] Comparison of Methods for the Determination of Formaldehyde in Air
    Giesen, Ruth
    Schripp, Tobias
    Markewitz, Doreen
    Meyer, Bettina
    Schwab, Harald
    Uhde, Erik
    Salthammer, Tunga
    [J]. ANALYTICAL LETTERS, 2016, 49 (10) : 1613 - 1621
  • [4] SAMPLING FOR FORMALDEHYDE IN WORKPLACE AND AMBIENT AIR ENVIRONMENTS - ADDITIONAL LABORATORY VALIDATION AND FIELD VERIFICATION OF A PASSIVE AIR MONITORING DEVICE COMPARED WITH CONVENTIONAL SAMPLING METHODS
    KRING, EV
    ANSUL, GR
    BASILIO, AN
    MCGIBNEY, PD
    STEPHENS, JS
    ODELL, HL
    [J]. AMERICAN INDUSTRIAL HYGIENE ASSOCIATION JOURNAL, 1984, 45 (05): : 318 - 324
  • [5] A COMPARISON OF METHODS OF DETERMINING THE CONCENTRATIONS OF RN-222 DECAY PRODUCTS IN AIR
    TERENTEV, MV
    KRISYUK, EM
    [J]. SOVIET ATOMIC ENERGY, 1983, 55 (05): : 763 - 767
  • [6] METHODS FOR SAMPLING AND DETERMINING CHLOROTRIFLUOROETHYLENE (CTFE) IN AIR
    DIETZ, EA
    HOFFMAN, VJ
    [J]. AMERICAN INDUSTRIAL HYGIENE ASSOCIATION JOURNAL, 1984, 45 (06): : 382 - 385
  • [7] SAMPLING AND ANALYTICAL METHODS FOR DETERMINING OIL MIST CONCENTRATIONS
    MENICHINI, E
    [J]. ANNALS OF OCCUPATIONAL HYGIENE, 1986, 30 (03): : 335 - 348
  • [8] APPLICATION OF CULTURABLE SAMPLING METHODS FOR THE ASSESSMENT OF WORKPLACE CONCENTRATIONS OF BIOAEROSOLS
    MARTINEZ, KF
    SEITZ, TA
    LONON, MK
    WEBER, AM
    [J]. INHALATION TOXICOLOGY, 1995, 7 (06) : 947 - 959
  • [9] A comparison of real-time monitoring of select metal concentrations in a copper smelter workplace compared to standard pump air sampling monitoring methods
    Freestone, Jamie L.
    Pahler, Leon F.
    Thiese, Matthew S.
    Larson, Rodney R.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL HEALTH & SAFETY, 2011, 18 (02): : 15 - 22
  • [10] AN IMPROVED PROCEDURE FOR SAMPLING AND ANALYSIS OF DINITROTOLUENE VAPOR CONCENTRATIONS IN WORKPLACE AIR
    HUNT, RJ
    NEUBAUER, NR
    PICONE, RF
    [J]. AMERICAN INDUSTRIAL HYGIENE ASSOCIATION JOURNAL, 1980, 41 (08): : 592 - 594