DIFFERENCES IN CULTURAL FRAME OF REFERENCE

被引:135
|
作者
OGBU, JU [1 ]
机构
[1] UNIV CALIF BERKELEY,SURVEY RES CTR,BERKELEY,CA 94720
关键词
D O I
10.1177/016502549301600307
中图分类号
B844 [发展心理学(人类心理学)];
学科分类号
040202 ;
摘要
There are at least two prerequisites for understanding the academic performance of minorities in contemporary urban industrial societies. The first is to distinguish among different types of minority status; the second is to distinguish different types of cultural difference. The distinctions between voluntary and involuntary minorities and between primary and secondary cultural differences are used as explanatory concepts. Voluntary minorities do not have persistent basic academic difficulties, no matter what their primary cultural differences from the dominant majority. The people who have the most difficulty with academic achievement are involuntary minorities. These difficulties stem from the responses that involuntary minorities have made to their forced incorporation and subsequent treatment, especially their formation of oppositional identity and oppositional cultural frame of reference. Such responses constitute secondary cultural differences. Unlike primary cultural differences, secondary cultural differences do not predate contact between the minority and the majority groups; rather, they are responses to the difficult nature of the contact.
引用
收藏
页码:483 / 506
页数:24
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Cultural differences in the use of frame spatial reference: The Case of the Mapuche Indigenous Children
    Alonqueo Boudon, Paula
    Silva Cid, Elena
    [J]. UNIVERSITAS PSYCHOLOGICA, 2012, 11 (03) : 839 - 852
  • [2] Cultural frame of reference and electoral participation in Catalonia
    Fernandez-i-Marin, Xavier
    Lopez, Jaume
    [J]. REVISTA ESPANOLA DE CIENCIA POLITICA-RECP, 2010, (23): : 31 - 57
  • [3] RACIAL SYMBIOSIS AND CULTURAL FRONTIERS: A FRAME OF REFERENCE
    Masuoka, Jitsuichi
    [J]. SOCIAL FORCES, 1946, 24 (03) : 348 - 353
  • [4] Embodiment of Spatial Reference Frames and Individual Differences in Reference Frame Proclivity
    Gramann, Klaus
    [J]. SPATIAL COGNITION AND COMPUTATION, 2013, 13 (01) : 1 - 25
  • [5] Cultural background shapes spatial reference frame proclivity
    Caspar Goeke
    Suchada Kornpetpanee
    Moritz Köster
    Andrés B. Fernández-Revelles
    Klaus Gramann
    Peter König
    [J]. Scientific Reports, 5
  • [6] Cultural background shapes spatial reference frame proclivity
    Goeke, Caspar
    Kornpetpanee, Suchada
    Koester, Moritz
    Fernandez-Revelles, Andres B.
    Gramann, Klaus
    Koenig, Peter
    [J]. SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2015, 5
  • [7] Basic cultural values and differences in attitudes towards health, illness and treatment preferences within a psychosomatic frame of reference
    Bekker, FJ
    Hentschel, U
    Fujita, M
    [J]. PSYCHOTHERAPY AND PSYCHOSOMATICS, 1996, 65 (04) : 191 - 198
  • [9] THACKERAY CULTURAL FRAME OF REFERENCE - ALLUSION IN THE 'NEWCOMES' - MCMASTER,RD
    MILLGATE, J
    [J]. ENGLISH STUDIES IN CANADA, 1992, 18 (02): : 240 - 242
  • [10] Cross-cultural differences in linguistic reference tracking
    Saner, Lelyn D.
    Hefright, Brook
    [J]. 6TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON APPLIED HUMAN FACTORS AND ERGONOMICS (AHFE 2015) AND THE AFFILIATED CONFERENCES, AHFE 2015, 2015, 3 : 4022 - 4027