ON THE EXPONENTIAL INSTABILITY OF N-BODY SYSTEMS

被引:109
|
作者
GOODMAN, J
HEGGIE, DC
HUT, P
机构
[1] UNIV EDINBURGH, DEPT MATH & STAT, EDINBURGH EH9 3JZ, MIDLOTHIAN, SCOTLAND
[2] INST ADV STUDY, PRINCETON, NJ 08540 USA
来源
ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL | 1993年 / 415卷 / 02期
关键词
METHODS; NUMERICAL;
D O I
10.1086/173196
中图分类号
P1 [天文学];
学科分类号
0704 ;
摘要
We reconsider the old problem of the growth of numerical errors in N-body integrations. We analyze the effects of successive encounters and show that these tend to magnify errors on a time scale which is comparable with the crossing time. This conclusion is based on an approximate treatment of encounters which can be analyzed in three ways: by construction of a master equation, by approximate analytic methods, and by simulation. However, a deeper discussion of the manner in which errors propagate from one star to another implies that the true rate of growth varies as ln ln N/t(cr). Next we study the growth of errors in N-body simulations, in which all gravitational interactions are correctly included. We confirm our earlier results and recent work of Kandrup & Smith that the rate of growth of errors per crossing time increases as N increases up to about 30, but that for larger systems the rate of growth is approximately independent of N. In this limit, errors grow with an e-folding time which is nearly one-tenth of a crossing time. This demonstrates that the N-dependence observed in the pioneering investigation by Miller, who considered systems with N less-than-or-equal-to 32, cannot be extended to larger N. We also investigate the rate of growth of errors in N-body systems with softened potentials. For example, when the softening radius is held at a fixed fraction of the size of the system, the rate of growth of errors varies approximately as N-1/3 when N is large enough. In the final section of the paper we summarize arguments to show that two-body interactions, and not collective effects, are the underlying physical mechanism causing the growth of errors in spherical stellar systems in dynamic equilibrium. We explain the distinction between this instability and two-body relaxation, and discuss its implications for N-body simulations. For example, it can be shown that the accurate simulation of a system up to the time of core collapse would require computations with O(N) decimal places. After core collapse the rate of growth of errors is still faster, because of three-body interactions involving binaries.
引用
收藏
页码:715 / 733
页数:19
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Rearranging the Exponential Wall for Large N-Body Systems
    Watson, Deborah K.
    Dunn, Martin
    PHYSICAL REVIEW LETTERS, 2010, 105 (02)
  • [2] Dynamical instability and statistical behaviour of N-body systems
    Cipriani, P
    Di Bari, M
    PLANETARY AND SPACE SCIENCE, 1998, 46 (11-12) : 1499 - 1524
  • [3] Dynamical instability and statistical behaviour of N-body systems
    Cipriani, Piero
    Di, Bari, Maria
    Planetary and Space Science, 46 (11-12): : 1499 - 1524
  • [4] INSTABILITY OF N-BODY SYSTEMS - CAN COMPUTERS SOLVE THE PROBLEM
    GURZADYAN, VG
    KOCHARYAN, AA
    JOURNAL OF PHYSICS A-MATHEMATICAL AND GENERAL, 1994, 27 (08): : 2879 - 2885
  • [5] Chaos in N-body systems
    Boccaletti, D
    Pucacco, G
    PLANETARY AND SPACE SCIENCE, 1998, 46 (11-12) : 1557 - 1566
  • [6] N-BODY RELATIVISTIC SYSTEMS
    DROZVINCENT, P
    COMPTES RENDUS HEBDOMADAIRES DES SEANCES DE L ACADEMIE DES SCIENCES SERIE A, 1979, 288 (22): : 1045 - 1048
  • [7] THE FUNDAMENTAL INSTABILITY OF THE GENERAL N-BODY PROBLEM
    MARCHAL, C
    ACTA ASTRONAUTICA, 1980, 7 (4-5) : 555 - 565
  • [8] Gravothermal expansion in N-body systems
    Endoh, H
    Fukushige, T
    Makino, J
    PUBLICATIONS OF THE ASTRONOMICAL SOCIETY OF JAPAN, 1997, 49 (03) : 345 - 352
  • [9] THE RADIAL ORBIT INSTABILITY IN COLLISIONLESS N-BODY SIMULATIONS
    Barnes, Eric I.
    Lanzel, Paul A.
    Williams, Liliya L. R.
    ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL, 2009, 704 (01): : 372 - 384
  • [10] Improbability of Collisions in n-Body Systems
    Stefan Fleischer
    Andreas Knauf
    Archive for Rational Mechanics and Analysis, 2019, 234 : 1007 - 1039