STREAMLINING ANTITRUST LITIGATION BY FACIAL EXAMINATION OF RESTRAINTS - THE BURGER COURT AND THE PER SE - RULE OF REASON DISTINCTION

被引：0

|

作者：

BRUNET, E

机构：

来源：

WASHINGTON LAW REVIEW | 1984年 / 60卷 / 01期

关键词：

D O I：

暂无

中图分类号：

D9 [法律]; DF [法律];

学科分类号：

0301 ;

摘要：

引用

收藏

页码：1 / 32

页数：32

相关论文

共 6 条

[1] THE TRANSFORMATION OF VERTICAL RESTRAINTS: PER SE ILLEGALITY, THE RULE OF REASON, AND PER SE LEGALITY
Sokol, D. Daniel
[J]. ANTITRUST LAW JOURNAL, 2014, 79 (03) : 1003 - 1016
[2] RECONCILING THE PER SE AND RULE OF REASON APPROACHES TO ANTITRUST ANALYSIS
PIRAINO, TA
[J]. SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA LAW REVIEW, 1991, 64 (03) : 685 - 739
[3] RE-EXAMINATION OF BOYCOTT PER SE RULE IN ANTITRUST LAW
SWITZER, HR
[J]. TEMPLE LAW REVIEW, 1974, 48 (01): : 126 - 149
[4] RULE OF REASON AS INTERPRETED BY SUPREME-COURT OF UNITED-STATES IN ANTITRUST LITIGATION - BRIEF ACCOUNT OF ITS FORMULATION
MYERS, DS
[J]. INTERNATIONAL REVIEW OF HISTORY AND POLITICAL SCIENCE, 1969, 6 (03): : 43 - 52
[5] ANTITRUST - PER SE RULE - HORIZONTAL RESTRAINTS OF TRADE, ABSENT ANY OTHER CONDEMNED BUSINESS PRACTICE ARE PER SE VIOLATIONS OF SHERMAN ACT - UNITED STATES V TOPCO ASSOCIATION, 405 US 596 (1972)
SGRO, J
[J]. CATHOLIC UNIVERSITY OF AMERICA LAW REVIEW, 1973, 22 (03): : 684 - 691
[6] The treatment of metering in antitrust law:: The supreme court's apparent abolition of the per se rule against metering in Illinois Tool Works, Inc. v. Independent Ink, Inc.
Grill, Brian T.
[J]. WISCONSIN LAW REVIEW, 2006, (05) : 1465 - 1492