Reliability and Validity of the Psychotherapy Supervisor Development Scale: A Meta-Analytic Evaluation

被引:3
|
作者
Barker, Keegan K. [1 ]
Hunsley, John [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada
来源
CLINICAL SUPERVISOR | 2014年 / 33卷 / 02期
关键词
professional supervision; practicum supervision; professional development; meta-analysis; reliability; validity;
D O I
10.1080/07325223.2014.978588
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
The Psychotherapy Supervisor Development Scale (Watkins, Schneider, Haynes, & Nieberding, 1995) is a measure developed to assess supervisor development as outlined by the Supervisor Complexity Model (Watkins, 1990, 1993, 1994). There is preliminary evidence of adequate psychometric properties for the measure in the published literature (Barnes & Moon, 2006; Hillman, McPherson, Swank, & Watkins, 1998; Watkins et al., 1995), but it remains a scale that requires more evaluation. We conducted reliability and validity generalization meta-analyses in order to better understand the PSDS's psychometric properties. The mean internal reliability generated from 1,163 participants (6 studies) was r = 0.93, 95% CI [0.91, 0.94]. As for the scale's convergent validity, the mean effect related to supervision experience derived from 948 participants (5 studies) was g = 0.40, 95% CI [0.17, 0.62], and the mean effect related to supervision training derived from 448 participants (4 studies) was g = 1.13, 95% CI [0.53, 1.73]. For each analysis, we characterize the variance in scores across studies, and consider sample and study characteristics that are predictive of the reliability and validity coefficients. We discuss the importance of conducting sample-specific reliability analyses and make recommendations for future research on the development of supervisor competency.
引用
收藏
页码:123 / 143
页数:21
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] The Security Scale as a measure of attachment: meta-analytic evidence of validity
    Brumariu, Laura E.
    Madigan, Sheri
    Giuseppone, Kathryn R.
    Abtahi, Mahsa Movahed
    Kerns, Kathryn A.
    [J]. ATTACHMENT & HUMAN DEVELOPMENT, 2018, 20 (06) : 600 - 625
  • [2] MMPI, RORSCHACH, AND WAIS - A META-ANALYTIC COMPARISON OF RELIABILITY, STABILITY, AND VALIDITY
    PARKER, KCH
    HANSON, RK
    HUNSLEY, J
    [J]. PSYCHOLOGICAL BULLETIN, 1988, 103 (03) : 367 - 373
  • [3] The reliability of meta-analytic review
    Zakzanis, KK
    [J]. PSYCHOLOGICAL REPORTS, 1998, 83 (01) : 215 - 222
  • [4] The Reliability and Validity of the Inventory of Callous Unemotional Traits: A Meta-Analytic Review
    Cardinale, Elise M.
    Marsh, Abigail A.
    [J]. ASSESSMENT, 2020, 27 (01) : 57 - 71
  • [5] The Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression: A meta-analytic reliability generalization study
    Lopez-Pina, Jose A.
    Sanchez-Meca, Julio
    Rosa-Alcazar, Ana I.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CLINICAL AND HEALTH PSYCHOLOGY, 2009, 9 (01) : 143 - 159
  • [6] THE META-ANALYTIC APPROACH OF RELIABILITY GENERALIZATION
    Sanchez-Meca, J.
    Lopez-Pina, J. A.
    [J]. ACCION PSICOLOGICA, 2008, 5 (02): : 37 - 64
  • [7] A Meta-Analytic Review of Psychotherapy Efficacy in China
    Xu, Hui
    Tracey, Terence J. G.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PSYCHOLOGY, 2016, 51 : 281 - 282
  • [8] The Alliance in Adult Psychotherapy: A Meta-Analytic Synthesis
    Fluckiger, Christoph
    Del Re, A. C.
    Wampold, Bruce E.
    Horvath, Adam O.
    [J]. PSYCHOTHERAPY, 2018, 55 (04) : 316 - 340
  • [9] CRITERION VALIDITY OF THE RORSCHACH MUTUALITY OF AUTONOMY (MOA) SCALE: A Meta-Analytic Review
    Monroe, Joel M.
    Diener, Marc J.
    Fowler, J. Christopher
    Sexton, James E.
    Hilsenroth, Mark J.
    [J]. PSYCHOANALYTIC PSYCHOLOGY, 2013, 30 (04) : 535 - 566
  • [10] The Narcissistic Grandiosity Scale: A Meta-Analytic Examination of Item Convergent and Discriminant Validity
    Rosenthal, Seth A.
    Montoya, R. Matthew
    Hooley, Jill M.
    Jurgens, Christopher T.
    [J]. PSYCHOLOGICAL ASSESSMENT, 2022, 34 (09) : 891 - 897