Measuring and improving student engagement in clinical training

被引:8
|
作者
Lee, Simin [1 ]
Valtis, Yannis K. [2 ]
Jun, Tomi [3 ]
Wang, David [2 ]
Zhang, Biqi [2 ]
Chung, Esther H. [2 ]
Yu, Amy [2 ]
Williams, Rachael [4 ]
Cohen, Marya J. [4 ]
机构
[1] Brigham & Womens Hosp, 75 Francis St, Boston, MA 02115 USA
[2] Harvard Med Sch, Boston, MA 02115 USA
[3] Stanford Univ, Palo Alto, CA 94304 USA
[4] Massachusetts Gen Hosp, John Dr Stoeckle Ctr Primary Care Innovat, Crimson Care Collaborat, Boston, MA 02114 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1080/14739879.2017.1398597
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Purpose: Volunteer service learning activities, including Student Run Clinics (SRCs), are becoming an increasingly popular extracurricular component of medical education. While there are reports that student clinicians generally enjoy their educational experiences at SRCs, it is not understood how to optimize and measure student engagement in them. To identify key drivers of student engagement a tool was created to measure volunteer experience at the Crimson Care Collaborative (CCC), a primary care SRC. Methods: CCC volunteers were asked to complete an online engagement survey. Cross-sectional survey data were collected for 149 CCC volunteers (53% response rate). Results: Multivariate linear regression showed that overall 'likelihood to recommend CCC to a friend' was significantly associated with students' perception of the clarity of their role within the clinic, frequency of interprofessional interactions, and overall quality of medical education. Students who volunteer more frequently and for longer periods of time had higher engagement scores. Conclusions: Measuring engagement is feasible in volunteer settings. Engagement appears to be dependent on both structural and experiential components. Easily modifiable components of job design (role definition, expected frequency of volunteering), are key drivers of volunteer engagement.
引用
收藏
页码:22 / 26
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Medical student evaluation of measuring engagement in clinical learning
    Platts, David
    Burrows, Mattew
    [J]. EDUCATION FOR PRIMARY CARE, 2018, 29 (02) : 122 - 122
  • [2] Measuring Student Engagement in the Online Course: The Online Student Engagement Scale (OSE)
    Dixson, Marcia D.
    [J]. ONLINE LEARNING, 2015, 19 (04): : 143 - 158
  • [3] Measuring Student Engagement During Collaboration
    Halpin, Peter F.
    von Davier, Alina A.
    Hao, Jiangang
    Liu, Lei
    [J]. JOURNAL OF EDUCATIONAL MEASUREMENT, 2017, 54 (01) : 70 - 84
  • [4] Measuring Student Engagement in Thermodynamics Courses
    Tebbe, Patrick A.
    Ross, Stewart
    Pribyl, Jeffrey R.
    [J]. 2013 IEEE FRONTIERS IN EDUCATION CONFERENCE, 2013,
  • [5] IMPROVING STUDENT ENGAGEMENT IN A FLIPPED CLASSROOM
    Chapman, M.
    Hassein, U.
    [J]. EDULEARN18: 10TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON EDUCATION AND NEW LEARNING TECHNOLOGIES, 2018, : 10773 - 10773
  • [6] Improving Student Engagement in Online Courses
    Sarder, B.
    [J]. 2014 ASEE ANNUAL CONFERENCE, 2014,
  • [7] TECHNOLOGIES & ESP: IMPROVING STUDENT ENGAGEMENT
    Hodgson, John
    [J]. LANGUAGES FOR SPECIFIC PURPOSES IN HIGHER EDUCATION: CURRENT TRENDS, APPROACHES AND ISSUES, 2017, : 29 - 29
  • [8] Improving Student Engagement Through Consultation
    Gallagher, Sinead M.
    [J]. ACCOUNTING EDUCATION, 2015, 24 (06) : 564 - 568
  • [9] Conceptualising and measuring student engagement through the Australasian Survey of Student Engagement (AUSSE): a critique
    Hagel, Pauline
    Carr, Rodney
    Devlin, Marcia
    [J]. ASSESSMENT & EVALUATION IN HIGHER EDUCATION, 2012, 37 (04) : 475 - 486
  • [10] Measuring cognitive and psychological engagement: Validation of the student engagement instrument
    Appleton, James J.
    Christenson, Sandra L.
    Kim, Dongjin
    Reschly, Amy L.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF SCHOOL PSYCHOLOGY, 2006, 44 (05) : 427 - 445