Comparison of manual compression and vascular hemostasis devices after coronary angiography or percutaneous coronary intervention through femoral artery access: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

被引:16
|
作者
Dahal, Khagendra [1 ]
Rijal, Jharendra [2 ]
Shahukhal, Ravi [3 ]
Sharma, Sharan [3 ]
Watti, Hussam [1 ]
Azrin, Michael [4 ]
Katikaneni, Pavan [1 ]
Jimenez, Enrique [5 ]
Tandon, Neeraj [5 ]
Modi, Kalgi [1 ]
Lee, Juyong [4 ]
机构
[1] Louisiana State Univ, Hlth Sci Ctr, Dept Med, Div Cardiol, Shreveport, LA USA
[2] Brown Univ, Miriam Hosp, Alpert Sch, Div Cardiol,Dept Med, Providence, RI USA
[3] Univ New England, LRG Healthcare, Dept Med, Laconia, NH USA
[4] Univ Connecticut, Hlth Ctr, Calhoun Cardiol Ctr, Farmington, CT USA
[5] Overton Brooks Vet Affairs Med Ctr, Dept Cardiol, Shreveport, LA USA
关键词
Manual compression; Vascular hemostasis device; Time-to-hemostasis; Time-to-ambulation;
D O I
10.1016/j.carrev.2017.08.009
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Objectives: To compare the efficacy and safety of manual compression (MC) with vascular hemostasis devices (VHD) in patients undergoing coronary angiography (CA) or percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) through femoral artery access. Introduction: The use of femoral artery access for coronary procedures may result in access-related complications, prolonged immobility and discomfort for the patients. MC results in longer time-to-hemostasis (TTH) and time-to-ambulation (TTA) compared to VHDs but its role in access-related complications remains unclear in patients undergoing coronary procedures. Methods: We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane CENTRAL and relevant references for English language randomized controlled trials (RCT) from inception through September 30, 2016. We performed the meta-analysis using random effects model. The outcomes were time-to-hemostasis, time-to-ambulation, major bleeding, large hematoma >5 cm, pseudoaneurysm and other adverse events. Results: The electronic database search resulted in a total of 44 RCTs with a total of 18,802 patients for analysis. MC, compared to VHD resulted in longer TTH [mean difference (MD): 11.21 min; 95% confidence interval (CI) 8.13-14.29; P < 0.00001] and TTA [standardized mean difference: 1.2 (0.79-1.62); P < 0.00001] along with excess risk of hematoma >5 cm formation [risk ratio (RR): 1.38 (1.15-1.67); P = 0.0008]. MC resulted in similar risk of major bleeding [1.01 (0.64-1.60); P = 0.95] pseudoaneurysm [0.99 (0.75-1.29); P = 0.92], infections [0.52 (0.25-1.10); P = 0.09], need of surgery [0.60 (0.29-1.22); P = 0.16), AV fistula [0.93 (0.68-1.27); P = 0.63] and ipsilateral leg ischemia [0.95 (0.57-1.60); P = 0.86] compared to VHD. Conclusion: Manual compression increase time-to-hemostasis, time-to-ambulation and risk of hematoma formation compared vascular hemostasis devices. (C) 2017 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:151 / 162
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Transulnar versus transradial access for coronary angiography or percutaneous coronary intervention: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
    Dahal, Khagendra
    Rijal, Jharendra
    Lee, Juyong
    Korr, Kenneth S.
    Azrin, Michael
    CATHETERIZATION AND CARDIOVASCULAR INTERVENTIONS, 2016, 87 (05) : 857 - 865
  • [2] Transulnar Versus Transradial Access for Coronary Angiography and Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
    Sedhom, Ramy
    Megaly, Michael
    Abraham, Bishoy
    Kalra, Sanjog
    Janzer, Sean
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2020, 76 (17) : B183 - B183
  • [3] Transulnar Versus Transradial Access for Coronary Angiography and Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
    Sedhom, Ramy
    Megaly, Michael
    Abraham, Bishoy
    George, Jon C.
    Kalra, Sanjog
    Janzer, Sean
    CARDIOVASCULAR REVASCULARIZATION MEDICINE, 2021, 26 : 39 - 45
  • [4] Radial versus femoral artery access for percutaneous coronary angiography and intervention: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials in Chinese population
    Liu, Peng
    Gao, Xue Liang
    Li, Bei Fang
    Ding, Xue Zhi
    Wang, Zi Hao
    Dang, Yan Ping
    Liu, Yang Gui
    Li, Yun Fu
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL MEDICINE, 2015, 8 (10): : 17151 - 17166
  • [5] Distal protection devices in primary percutaneous coronary intervention of native coronary artery lesions: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
    Jin, Bo
    Dong, Xue-Hong
    Zhang, Chao
    Li, Yong
    Shi, Hai-Ming
    CURRENT MEDICAL RESEARCH AND OPINION, 2012, 28 (06) : 871 - 876
  • [6] Comparison between radial and femoral access for percutaneous coronary intervention in left main coronary artery disease: a meta-analysis of nonrandomized trials
    Ye, Yicong
    Zeng, Yong
    CORONARY ARTERY DISEASE, 2019, 30 (02) : 79 - 86
  • [7] Femoral vascular access complications following arteriotomy closure devices: A comparison with manual compression after percutaneous coronary interventions
    Mehran, R
    Dangas, G
    Hong, MK
    Deible, R
    Faraj, H
    El Sayyad, S
    Negoita, M
    Okubagzi, P
    Astatkie, M
    Pichard, AD
    Stone, GW
    Leon, MB
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2000, 35 (02) : 33A - 34A
  • [8] Distal Versus Proximal Radial Arterial Access for Percutaneous Coronary Angiography and Intervention: Updated Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
    Mufarrih, Syed Hamza
    Haider, Sajjad
    Qureshi, Nada Qaisar
    Khan, Mohammad Saud
    Kazimuddin, Mohammed
    Akbar, Muhammad Shoaib
    Saleem, Sameer
    Mufarrih, Syeda Aleena
    Tripathi, Avnish
    Singh, Aniruddha
    Waheed, Mohammad Abdul
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 2024, 218 : 34 - 42
  • [9] Network meta-analysis of studies comparing closure devices for femoral access after percutaneous coronary intervention
    Iannaccone, Mario
    Saint-Hilary, Gaelle
    Menardi, Davide
    Vadala, Paolo
    Bernardi, Alessandro
    Bianco, Matteo
    Montefusco, Antonio
    Omede, Pierluigi
    D'Amico, Salvatore
    Piazza, Fabio
    Scacciatella, Paolo
    D'Amico, Maurizio
    Moretti, Claudio
    Biondi-Zoccai, Giuseppe
    Gasparini, Mauro
    Gaita, Fiorenzo
    D'Ascenzo, Fabrizio
    JOURNAL OF CARDIOVASCULAR MEDICINE, 2018, 19 (10) : 586 - 596
  • [10] Rescue percutaneous coronary intervention after failed fibrinolysis: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
    Patel, T
    Bavry, A
    Khumbani, D
    Ellis, S
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2006, 47 (04) : 173A - 173A