Efficacy of antimicrobial lock solutions in preventing catheter-related blood stream infection in haemodialysis patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis of prospective randomised controlled trials

被引:0
|
作者
Yakasai, Ahmad Maifada [1 ]
Muhammad, Hamza [2 ,3 ]
Iliyasu, Garba [2 ,3 ]
Nalado, Aisha Muhammad [3 ,4 ]
Dalhat, Mahmood Muhammad [2 ,3 ]
Habib, Zaiyad Garba [5 ]
Daiyabu, Farouk [2 ,3 ]
Edwin, Chinagozi Precious [6 ]
Maiyaki, Musa Baba [3 ,7 ]
Ibrahim, Daiyabu Alhaji [3 ,7 ]
机构
[1] Northwest Univ, Coll Med Sci, Publ Hlth & Diagnost Inst, Infect & Trop Dis Unit,Dept Med, Kano, Nigeria
[2] Bayero Univ, Dept Med, Infect & Trop Dis Unit, Kano, Nigeria
[3] Aminu Kano Teaching Hosp, Kano, Nigeria
[4] Bayero Univ, Dept Med, Nephrol & Haemodialysis Unit, Kano, Nigeria
[5] Univ Abuja, Teaching Hosp, Dept Med, Abuja, Nigeria
[6] Aminu Kano Teaching Hosp, Dept Microbiol, Kano, Nigeria
[7] Bayero Univ, Dept Med, Kano, Nigeria
关键词
antimicrobials; blood stream infection; catheter; efficacy; haemodialysis; meta-analysis; systematic review;
D O I
10.1080/23120053.2016.1156811
中图分类号
R51 [传染病];
学科分类号
100401 ;
摘要
Background: Catheter-related blood stream infection (CRBSI) contributes to morbidity and mortality among patients on haemodialysis (HD). We carried out a systematic review and meta-analysis to assess the efficacy of antimicrobial lock solutions (ALS) in preventing CRBSI. Method: Electronic search of randomised controlled trials (RCTs) comparing ALS with other agents was performed up to January 2013. DerSimonian and Laird meta-analysis was performed to obtain pooled relative risk (RR) from which efficacy of ALS and numbers needed to treat (NNT) were calculated. In a restricted analysis, pooled RRs where compared using a test of interaction to calculate ratio of relative risks (RRR). Meta-regression analysis was employed to explore sources of heterogeneity. Results: Sixteen RCTs involving 2016 individuals met the inclusion criteria. The efficacy of ALS in preventing CRBSI was 80% with NNT of 3 patients to prevent one CRBSI. The RR of CRBSI was significantly lower with ALS compared with heparin-only lock solution [RR {95% confidence interval (CI)} = 0.20 (0.13-0.31)]. With low dose (<= 5 mg/ml) and high dose (40 mg/ml) gentamicin-containing ALS, the RR (95% CI) of developing CRBSI was 0.03 (0.01-0.13) and 0.18 (0.03-0.98), respectively, with no significant difference [RRR (95% CI) = 0.2 (0.02-1.61), p = 0.126]. Heterogeneity was explained by a statistically significant association between rate of CRBSI and catheter days (p = 0.037). Conclusion: ALS are effective in preventing CRBSI. Low dose gentamicin should be preferred over high dose gentamicin as an ALS because it offers similar benefit in preventing CRBSI with lesser risk of toxicity from systemic leakage and subsequent development of drug resistance.
引用
收藏
页码:95 / 102
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Antimicrobial lock solutions for the prevention of catheter-related infection in patients undergoing haemodialysis: study protocol for network meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials
    Zhang, Jun
    Li, Rong-Ke
    Chen, Kee-Hsin
    Ge, Long
    Tian, Jin-Hui
    BMJ OPEN, 2016, 6 (01):
  • [2] Preventing haemodialysis catheter-related bacteraemia with an antimicrobial lock solution: a meta-analysis of prospective randomized trials
    Labriola, Laura
    Crott, Ralph
    Jadoul, Michel
    NEPHROLOGY DIALYSIS TRANSPLANTATION, 2008, 23 (05) : 1666 - 1672
  • [3] Antimicrobial lock solutions for preventing catheter-related infections in haemodialysis
    Arechabala, Maria C.
    Catoni, Maria I.
    Carlos Claro, Juan
    Rojas, Noelia P.
    Rubio, Miriam E.
    Calvo, Mario A.
    Letelier, Luz M.
    COCHRANE DATABASE OF SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS, 2018, (04):
  • [4] What is the best catheter lock solution in preventing catheter-related blood infections? A protocol for a Bayesian network meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials
    Dang, Fangping
    Li, Huiju
    Tian, Jinhui
    Wang, Ruijuan
    Ren, Jingjie
    BMJ OPEN, 2019, 9 (06):
  • [5] Antibiotic-based catheter lock solutions for prevention of catheter-related bloodstream infection: a systematic review of randomised controlled trials
    Snaterse, M.
    Ruger, W.
    Reimer, W. J. M. Scholte Op
    Lucas, C.
    JOURNAL OF HOSPITAL INFECTION, 2010, 75 (01) : 1 - 11
  • [6] Comparative efficacy of various antimicrobial lock solutions for preventing catheter-related bloodstream infections: A network meta-analysis of 9099 patients from 52 randomized controlled trials
    Dang, Fang-Ping
    Li, Hui-Ju
    Wang, Rui-Juan
    Wu, Qi
    Chen, Hui
    Ren, Jing-Jie
    Tian, Jin-Hui
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF INFECTIOUS DISEASES, 2019, 87 : 154 - 165
  • [7] Taurolidine Lock Solutions for the Prevention of Catheter-Related Bloodstream Infections: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
    Liu, Yong
    Zhang, An-Qiang
    Cao, Lin
    Xia, Hong-Tao
    Ma, Jun-Jie
    PLOS ONE, 2013, 8 (11):
  • [8] Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Antibiotic and Antimicrobial Lock Solutions for Prevention of Hemodialysis Catheter-Related Infections
    Salim, Sohail Abdul
    Masoud, Ahmed Taher
    Thongprayoon, Charat
    Cheungpasitporn, Wisit
    Soliman, Karim M.
    Garla, Vishnu
    Sofy, Ahmed Adel
    Ahmed, Ahmed Saeed
    Abdelsattar, Ahmed Taha
    Zsom, Lajos
    Tapolyai, Mihaly
    Fulop, Tibor
    ASAIO JOURNAL, 2021, 67 (10) : 1079 - 1086
  • [9] Ethanol locks for the prevention of catheter-related infection in patients with central venous catheter: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
    Zhang, Jun
    Wang, Bo
    Wang, Jinxia
    Yang, Qin
    PLOS ONE, 2019, 14 (09):
  • [10] Comparative efficacy and safety of lock solutions for the prevention of catheter-related complications including infectious and bleeding events in adult haemodialysis patients: a systematic review and network meta-analysis
    Sheng, K. X.
    Zhang, P.
    Li, J. W.
    Cheng, J.
    He, Y. C.
    Bohlke, M.
    Chen, J. H.
    CLINICAL MICROBIOLOGY AND INFECTION, 2020, 26 (05) : 545 - 552