INTEROBSERVER VARIABILITY IN THE MEASUREMENT OF DIASTOLIC BLOOD-PRESSURE IN PREGNANCY

被引:7
|
作者
JOHENNING, AR
KARRISON, TG
BARRON, WM
机构
[1] UNIV CHICAGO, DEPT INTERNAL MED, CHICAGO, IL 60637 USA
[2] UNIV CHICAGO, DEPT OBSTET & GYNECOL, COMM CLIN PHARMACOL, CHICAGO, IL 60637 USA
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
BLOOD PRESSURE DETERMINATION; INTEROBSERVER VARIATION; PREGNANCY;
D O I
10.3109/10641959509015676
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Objective: The objective of this study was to evaluate and compare the magnitude of interobserver variability present when measuring Korotkoff phase 4 versus phase 5 in pregnant women. Methods: Three observers with different backgrounds simultaneously measured both phase 4 and phase 5 on 98 gravidas. Data were used to estimate detectability rates, perform an analysis of variance to assess interobserver variability, examine the distribution of interobserver differences, and evaluate the magnitude of the difference between the two diastolic end points. Main Outcome Measures: Detectability rates of phase 4 and phase 5 diastolic pressure and measures of interobserver variability in diastolic readings. Results: Detectability rates were observer dependent, ranging from 81% to 96% for phase 4 and from 79% to 85% for phase 5. Analysis of variance demonstrated similar degrees of interobserver variability for both end points. Likewise, for any two observers measuring either end point, there was a similar number of measurements that differed by at least 8 mm Hg. Lastly, the median difference between the two end points was estimated to be 6-12 mm Hg, depending on the observer. Conclusions: These results do not convincingly favor use of either Korotkoff 4 or Korotkoff 5 in pregnancy. Detectability rates differ among observers and interobserver variability in measurement of blood pressure is significant; improved training for all is suggested.
引用
收藏
页码:301 / 311
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] RECORDING DIASTOLIC BLOOD-PRESSURE IN PREGNANCY
    BROWN, MA
    WHITWORTH, JA
    [J]. BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 1991, 303 (6794): : 120 - 121
  • [2] RECORDING DIASTOLIC BLOOD-PRESSURE IN PREGNANCY
    PERRY, IJ
    STEWART, BA
    BROCKWELL, J
    KHAN, M
    DAVIES, P
    BEEVERS, DG
    LUESLEY, DM
    [J]. BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 1990, 301 (6762): : 1198 - 1198
  • [3] RECORDING DIASTOLIC BLOOD-PRESSURE IN PREGNANCY
    MACGILLIVRAY, I
    THOMAS, P
    [J]. BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 1991, 302 (6769): : 179 - 179
  • [4] BLOOD-PRESSURE MEASUREMENT IN PREGNANCY
    DESWIET, M
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 1991, 98 (03): : 239 - 240
  • [5] BLOOD-PRESSURE MEASUREMENT IN PREGNANCY
    QUINN, MJ
    [J]. LANCET, 1991, 338 (8759): : 130 - 130
  • [6] VARIABILITY AND RELIABILITY OF DIASTOLIC BLOOD-PRESSURE DURING ADOLESCENCE - THE PHILADELPHIA BLOOD-PRESSURE PROJECT
    HEDIGER, ML
    SCHALL, JI
    BARKER, WF
    BOWERS, EJ
    GRUSKIN, AB
    KATZ, SH
    [J]. PREVENTIVE MEDICINE, 1981, 10 (03) : 292 - 300
  • [7] VARIABILITY IN INDIRECT BLOOD-PRESSURE MEASUREMENT
    BOTTINI, PB
    CARR, AA
    [J]. ARCHIVES OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 1994, 154 (13) : 1536 - 1536
  • [8] AUTOMATED BLOOD-PRESSURE MEASUREMENT IN PREGNANCY
    MARX, GF
    SCHWALBE, SS
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 1994, 170 (02) : 703 - 703
  • [9] AMBULATORY BLOOD-PRESSURE MEASUREMENT IN PREGNANCY
    OBRIEN, E
    DARLING, M
    HIGGINS, J
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 1994, 101 (05): : 462 - 463
  • [10] ERRORS IN THE MEASUREMENT OF BLOOD-PRESSURE IN PREGNANCY
    FLEMING, SE
    DUGGAN, GG
    HORVATH, JS
    KORDA, A
    TILLER, DJ
    [J]. AUSTRALIAN & NEW ZEALAND JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS & GYNAECOLOGY, 1980, 20 (03): : 189 - 189