THE SIGNIFICANCE OF PROSTATIC INTRAEPITHELIAL NEOPLASIA

被引:62
|
作者
ABOSEIF, S
SHINOHARA, K
WEIDNER, N
NARAYAN, P
CARROLL, PR
机构
[1] UNIV CALIF SAN FRANCISCO,SCH MED,DEPT UROL,SAN FRANCISCO,CA 94143
[2] UNIV CALIF SAN FRANCISCO,SCH MED,DEPT PATHOL,SAN FRANCISCO,CA 94143
[3] UNIV CALIF SAN FRANCISCO,MT ZION MED CTR,PROGRAM UROL ONCOL,SAN FRANCISCO,CA 94120
来源
BRITISH JOURNAL OF UROLOGY | 1995年 / 76卷 / 03期
关键词
PROSTATE CARCINOMA; PROSTATIC INTRAEPITHELIAL NEOPLASIA;
D O I
10.1111/j.1464-410X.1995.tb07714.x
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Objective To investigate the relationship between the detection of prostatic intra-epithelial neoplasia (PIN) on initial prostate biopsy and subsequent invasive prostatic adenocarcinoma. Patients and methods Thirty-six men (mean age 67 years, range 52-82) with PIN underwent digital rectal examination (DRE), serum prostate-specific antigen (PSA) measurement and transrectal ultrasonography (TRUS) before the initial biopsy and documentation of PIN, They were followed up with serial PSA, TRUS and a repeat biopsy every 6 months until either invasive carcinoma was identified or 2 years had elapsed. Results The initial biopsy revealed Grade I PIN in 33%, Grade II in 22%, and Grade III in 45% of the men. The repeat biopsy showed evidence of invasive carcinoma in 21 patients (58%; Group I), while 15 (42%) showed persistence of PIN (Group II). In Group I, 19 had had high-grade PIN (Grade II/III) on initial biopsy compared with one in Group II. The findings on DRE, and age, were not significantly different between groups. TRUS revealed a hypoechoic lesion in 15/21 patients in Group I compared with 7/15 patients in Group II. There was an increase in PSA level in 18 patients in Group I(from 8.4 to 11.6 ng/mL). Conclusions PIN and invasive adenocarcinoma of the prostate were closely associated, and the likelihood for coexistence was higher in patients with high-grade PIN, increasing PSA level or positive findings on TRUS. We recommend that all patients who show high-grade PIN on prostate biopsy be followed very closely with serial PSA measurements and repeat biopsies from both the area of PIN and other areas of the prostate.
引用
收藏
页码:355 / 359
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia
    Bostwick D.G.
    [J]. Current Urology Reports, 2000, 1 (1) : 65 - 70
  • [2] PROSTATIC INTRAEPITHELIAL NEOPLASIA (PIN) - MORPHOLOGICAL CLINICAL-SIGNIFICANCE
    MOSTOFI, FK
    SESTERHENN, IA
    DAVIS, CJ
    [J]. PROSTATE, 1992, : 71 - 77
  • [3] SIGNIFICANCE OF PROSTATIC INTRAEPITHELIAL NEOPLASIA ON PROSTATE NEEDLE-BIOPSY
    BRAWER, MK
    BIGLER, SA
    SOHLBERG, OE
    NAGLE, RB
    LANGE, PH
    [J]. UROLOGY, 1991, 38 (02) : 103 - 107
  • [4] Prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia: its morphological and molecular diagnosis and clinical significance
    Montironi, Rodolfo
    Mazzucchelli, Roberta
    Lopez-Beltran, Antonio
    Scarpelli, Marina
    Cheng, Liang
    [J]. BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2011, 108 (09) : 1394 - 1399
  • [5] Significance of high-grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia on prostate biopsy
    Meng, MV
    Shinohara, K
    Grossfeld, GD
    [J]. UROLOGIC ONCOLOGY-SEMINARS AND ORIGINAL INVESTIGATIONS, 2003, 21 (02) : 145 - 151
  • [6] Chemoprevention for prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia
    Nelson, PS
    Gleason, TP
    Brawer, MK
    [J]. EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 1996, 30 (02) : 269 - 278
  • [7] PROSTATIC INTRAEPITHELIAL NEOPLASIA (PIN)
    BOSTWICK, DG
    [J]. UROLOGY, 1989, 34 (06) : 16 - 22
  • [8] Ultrastructure of prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia
    Bostwick, DG
    Pacelli, A
    LopezBeltran, A
    [J]. PROSTATE, 1997, 33 (01): : 32 - 37
  • [9] Mimickers of Prostatic Intraepithelial Neoplasia
    Epstein, Jonathan I.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SURGICAL PATHOLOGY, 2010, 18 (03) : 142S - 148S
  • [10] PATTERNS OF PROSTATIC INTRAEPITHELIAL NEOPLASIA
    Kalyani, Dukkipati
    Sasank, Ramanavarapu
    [J]. JOURNAL OF EVOLUTION OF MEDICAL AND DENTAL SCIENCES-JEMDS, 2018, 7 (04): : 399 - 402