IS THERE A CASE FOR AD-HOMINEM ARGUMENTS

被引：5

作者：

JASON, GJ

机构：

来源：

关键词：

D O I：

10.1080/00048408412341381

中图分类号：

B [哲学、宗教];

学科分类号：

01 ; 0101 ;

摘要：

引用

页码：182 / 185

页数：4

共 50 条

[1] THE CASE FOR AD-HOMINEM ARGUMENTS
HINMAN, LM
[J]. AUSTRALASIAN JOURNAL OF PHILOSOPHY, 1982, 60 (04) : 338 - 345
[2] Ad-hominem arguments
Swoyer, C
[J]. PHILOSOPHICAL REVIEW, 2001, 110 (02): : 291 - 295
[3] Ad-Hominem arguments
Viney, DW
[J]. MIDWEST QUARTERLY-A JOURNAL OF CONTEMPORARY THOUGHT, 1999, 40 (04): : 517 - 518
[4] AD-HOMINEM
CLEMENTS, E
[J]. SIERRA, 1984, 69 (05) : 9 - 9
[5] AD-HOMINEM MORALITY
EZORSKY, G
[J]. JOURNAL OF PHILOSOPHY, 1966, 63 (05): : 120 - 125
[6] AD-HOMINEM BOOK REVIEW
NOGAY, ME
[J]. NEW REPUBLIC, 1980, 182 (03) : 4 - 4
[7] A RHETORICAL VIEW OF THE AD-HOMINEM
BRINTON, A
[J]. AUSTRALASIAN JOURNAL OF PHILOSOPHY, 1985, 63 (01) : 50 - 63
[8] Ad-hominem arguments in the Dutch and the European Parliaments Strategic manoeuvring in an institutional context
Plug, H. Jose
[J]. EUROPEAN PARLIAMENTS UNDER SCRUTINY: DISCOURSE STRATEGIES AND INTERACTION PRACTICES, 2010, 38 : 305 - 328
[9] ADVERTISEMENT - AD-VIVUM OR AD-HOMINEM
RAND, P
RAND, A
[J]. DAEDALUS, 1960, 89 (01) : 127 - 135
[10] Whately on the ad-hominem: A liberal exegesis
Hansen, HV
[J]. PHILOSOPHY AND RHETORIC, 1996, 29 (04) : 400 - 415