Multi-attribute information technology project selection using fuzzy axiomatic design

被引:23
|
作者
Kulak, Osman [1 ]
Kahraman, Cengiz [1 ]
Oztaysi, Basar [1 ]
Tanyas, Mehmet [1 ]
机构
[1] Istanbul Tech Univ, Dept Ind Engn, Istanbul, Turkey
关键词
Communication technologies; Fuzzy control;
D O I
10.1108/17410390510591978
中图分类号
TP39 [计算机的应用];
学科分类号
081203 ; 0835 ;
摘要
Purpose - Significant productivity improvements have been experienced in business by information technology (IT) implementations in latest decades. However, IT project selection is an important problem because a significant part of IT expenditure is wasted and almost half of IT projects realize no net benefits. Since axiomatic design (AD) has the characteristics of multi-attribute evaluation, it is proposed for multi-attribute comparison of information technology systems (ITS). Design/methodology/approach - The comparison of ITS is made for the cases of both complete and incomplete information. The crisp AD approach for complete information and the fuzzy AD approach for incomplete information are developed. The numerical applications of both crisp and fuzzy AD approaches in the comparison of ITS are also given. Findings - The AD approach takes into account the design range of each criterion, determined by the designer. Thus, the alternative providing the design ranges is selected in AD approach while the alternative meeting the criteria at their best levels is selected in many other methods. This opportunity is not possible when many other existing methods such as AHP, fuzzy AHP, and scoring models are used. The AD approach also differs from many other existing methods from the point of the rejection of an alternative when it does not meet the design range of any criterion. Research limitations/implications - For future research, it is suggested that researchers study weighted crisp and fuzzy AD approaches. Originality/value - This paper is the first which develops the fuzzy AD approach and uses it in the comparison of ITS.
引用
收藏
页码:275 / +
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Fuzzy multi-attribute selection among transportation companies using axiomatic design and analytic hierarchy process
    Kulak, O
    Kahraman, C
    [J]. INFORMATION SCIENCES, 2005, 170 (2-4) : 191 - 210
  • [2] A new multi-attribute decision making method: Hierarchical fuzzy axiomatic design
    Kahraman, Cengiz
    Cebi, Selcuk
    [J]. EXPERT SYSTEMS WITH APPLICATIONS, 2009, 36 (03) : 4848 - 4861
  • [3] Fuzzy multi-attribute equipment selection based on information axiom
    Kulak, O
    Durmusoglu, MB
    Kahraman, C
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MATERIALS PROCESSING TECHNOLOGY, 2005, 169 (03) : 337 - 345
  • [4] Multi-attribute comparison of advanced manufacturing systems using fuzzy vs. crisp axiomatic design approach
    Kulak, O
    Kahraman, C
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PRODUCTION ECONOMICS, 2005, 95 (03) : 415 - 424
  • [5] Multi-attribute Evaluation and Optimal Selection Using Information Axiom
    Cheng, X. F.
    Liu, P. A.
    Chen, C.
    [J]. MANUFACTURING SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING, PTS 1-5, 2010, 97-101 : 3523 - 3526
  • [6] A stable matching method for technology trading with intuitionistic fuzzy multi-attribute information
    Kong, Decai
    Tang, Yi
    Zhang, Hao
    Bi, Aorui
    [J]. JOURNAL OF INTELLIGENT & FUZZY SYSTEMS, 2023, 45 (06) : 12395 - 12409
  • [7] Adjustable robustness for multi-attribute project portfolio selection
    Fliedner, Thomas
    Liesio, Juuso
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 2016, 252 (03) : 931 - 946
  • [8] Sensitivity analysis for multi-attribute project selection problems
    Guikema, S
    Milke, M
    [J]. CIVIL ENGINEERING AND ENVIRONMENTAL SYSTEMS, 2003, 20 (03) : 143 - 162
  • [9] Fuzzy multi-attribute information fusion approach for finance investment selection with the expert reliability
    Li, Yanhong
    Kou, Gang
    Li, Guangxu
    Hefni, Mohammed A.
    [J]. APPLIED SOFT COMPUTING, 2022, 126
  • [10] Spatial multi-attribute decision analysis: Axiomatic foundations and incomplete preference information
    Harju, Mikko
    Liesio, Juuso
    Virtanen, Kai
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 2019, 275 (01) : 167 - 181