Empirical performance of multifactor term structure models for pricing and hedging Eurodollar futures options

被引:0
|
作者
Kuo, I-Doun [1 ]
Lin, Yueh-Neng [2 ]
机构
[1] Tunghai Univ, Dept Finance, 181 Taichung Kan Rd, Taichung 407, Taiwan
[2] Natl Chung Hsing Univ, Dept Finance, Taichung 402, Taiwan
关键词
Multifactor HJM model; Volatility function; Eurodollar futures option;
D O I
10.1016/j.rfe.2007.12.001
中图分类号
F8 [财政、金融];
学科分类号
0202 ;
摘要
This article compares two one-factor, two two-factor, two three-factor models in the HJM class and Black's [Black, F. (1976). The pricing of commodity contracts. Journal of Financial Economics, 3, 167-179.] implied volatility function in terms of their pricing and hedging performance for Eurodollar futures options across strikes and maturities from 1 Jan 2000 to 31 Dec 2002. We find that three-factor models perform the best for 1-day and 1-week prediction, as well as for 5-day and 20-day hedging. The moneyness bias and the maturity bias appear for all models, but the three-factor models produce lower bias. Three-factor models also outperform other models in hedging, in particular for away-from-the-money and long-dated options. Making Black's volatility a square root or exponential function performs similar to one-factor HJM models in pricing, but not in hedging. Correctly specified and calibrated multifactor models are thus important and cannot be replaced by one-factor models in pricing or hedging interest rate contingent claims. (C) 2008 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:23 / 32
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条