Impact of surgical case order on perioperative outcomes for robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy

被引:11
|
作者
Thomas, Anil A. [1 ]
Kim, Brian [1 ]
Derboghossians, Armen [1 ]
Chang, Allen [1 ]
Finley, David S. [1 ]
Chien, Gary W. [1 ]
Slezak, Jeffrey [2 ]
Jacobsen, Steven J. [2 ]
机构
[1] Kaiser Permanente Los Angeles Med Ctr, Dept Urol, 4900 Sunset Blvd,2nd Floor, Los Angeles, CA 90027 USA
[2] Kaiser Permanente Southern Calif, Dept Res & Evaluat, Los Angeles, CA USA
关键词
Case order; cost; morbidity; robotic radical prostatectomy;
D O I
10.4103/0974-7796.130645
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Objectives: Since its introduction, there have been many refinements in the technique and implementation of robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP). However, it is unclear whether operative outcomes are influenced by surgical case order. We evaluated the effect of case order on perioperative outcomes for RARP within a large health maintenance organization. Materials and Methods: We conducted a retrospective review of RARP cases performed at our institution from September 2008 to December 2010 using a single robotic platform. Case order was determined from surgical schedules each day and surgeries were grouped into 1st, 2nd and 3rd round cases. Fourth round cases (n = 1) were excluded from analysis. We compared clinicopathological variables including operative time, estimated blood loss (EBL), surgical margin rates and complication rates between groups. Results: Of the 1018 RARP cases in this cohort, 476 (47%) were performed as 1st round cases, 398 (39%) 2nd round cases and 144 (14%) 3rd round cases by a total of 18 surgeons. Mean operative time was shorter as cases were performed later in the day (213 min vs. 209 min vs. 180 min, P < 0.0001) and similarly, EBL also decreased with surgical order (136 mL vs. 134 mL vs. 103 mL, P = 0.01). Transfusion rates, surgical margin rates and complication rates did not significantly differ between groups. Patients undergoing RARP later in the day were much more likely to have a hospital stay of 2 or more days than earlier cases (10% vs. 11% vs. 32%, P = 0.01). Conclusions: Surgical case order may influence perioperative outcomes for RARP with decreased operative times and increased length of hospital stay associated with later cases. These findings indicate that select perioperative factors may improve with ascending case order as the surgical team "warms up" during the day. In addition, 3rd round cases can increase hospital costs associated with increased lengths of hospital stay. Knowledge of these differences may assist in surgical planning to improve outcomes and limit costs.
引用
收藏
页码:142 / 146
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] IMPACT OF SURGICAL CASE ORDER ON PERIOPERATIVE OUTCOMES FOR ROBOTIC-ASSISTED RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY
    Thomas, Anil
    Derboghossians, Armen
    Chang, Allen
    Finley, David
    Slezak, Jeff
    Kim, Brian
    Jacobsen, Steven
    Chien, Gary
    [J]. JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2013, 189 (04): : E366 - E366
  • [2] Clipless Robotic-assisted Radical Prostatectomy and Impact on Outcomes
    Basourakos, Spyridon P.
    Zhu, Alec
    Lewicki, Patrick J.
    Ramaswamy, Ashwin
    Cheng, Emily
    Dudley, Vanessa
    Yu, Miko
    Karir, Beerinder
    Hung, Andrew J.
    Khani, Francesca
    Hu, Jim C.
    [J]. EUROPEAN UROLOGY FOCUS, 2022, 8 (05): : 1176 - 1185
  • [3] Impact of Preoperative Mental Health on Surgical Outcomes Following Robotic-assisted Radical Prostatectomy
    Hirst, Nicholas
    McBride, Kate E.
    Thanigasalam, Ruban
    Leslie, Scott
    Karunaratne, Sascha
    Alexander, Kate
    Treacy, Patrick-Julien
    Steffens, Daniel
    [J]. UROLOGY, 2023, 182 : 136 - 142
  • [4] "Robotic fatigue?" - The impact of case order on positive surgical margins in robotic-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy
    Bukavina, Laura
    Mishra, Kirtishri
    Mahran, Amr
    Fernstrum, Austin
    Al Ray, III
    Markt, Sarah
    Schumacher, Fredrick
    Conroy, Britt
    Abouassaly, Robert
    MacLennan, Gregory
    Smith, Garrett
    Ferry, Elizabeth
    Wong, Daniel
    Lotan, Yair
    Chaparala, Hemant
    Sharp, David
    Alazem, Kareem
    Moinzadeh, Alireza
    Adamic, Brittany
    Zagaja, Gregory
    Kang, Puneet
    Lawry, Holly
    Lee, Benjamin
    Calaway, Adam
    Ponsky, Lee
    [J]. UROLOGIC ONCOLOGY-SEMINARS AND ORIGINAL INVESTIGATIONS, 2021, 39 (06) : 365.e17 - 365.e23
  • [5] Preventing Perioperative Complications of Robotic-assisted Radical Prostatectomy
    Liss, Michael A.
    Skarecky, Douglas
    Morales, Blanca
    Osann, Kathryn
    Eichel, Louis
    Ahlering, Thomas E.
    [J]. UROLOGY, 2013, 81 (02) : 319 - 323
  • [6] Positive surgical margins in robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy: Impact of learning curve on oncologic outcomes
    Atug, F
    Castle, EP
    Srivastav, SK
    Burgess, SV
    Thomas, R
    Davis, R
    [J]. EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2006, 49 (05) : 866 - 872
  • [7] OBESITY AND PERIOPERATIVE PULMONARY COMPLICATIONS IN ROBOTIC-ASSISTED RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY
    Haliloglu, Murat
    Zengin, Ulgen
    Ozdemir, Mehtap
    Bakan, Nurten
    [J]. OBESITY SURGERY, 2015, 25 : S183 - S183
  • [8] SURGICAL TECHNICAL PERFORMANCE IMPACTS PATIENT OUTCOMES IN ROBOTIC-ASSISTED RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY
    Goldenberg, Mitchell G.
    Goldenberg, S. Larry
    Grantcharov, Teodor P.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2017, 197 (04): : E699 - E699
  • [9] Impact of Obesity on Perioperative Outcomes at Robotic-assisted and Open Radical Prostatectomy: Results From the National Inpatient Sample
    Unwala, Darius J.
    [J]. UROLOGY, 2019, 133 : 143 - 143
  • [10] Impact of Obesity on Perioperative Outcomes at Robotic-assisted and Open Radical Prostatectomy: Results From the National Inpatient Sample
    Knipper, Sophie
    Mazzone, Elio
    Mistretta, Francesco A.
    Palumbo, Carlotta
    Tian, Zhe
    Briganti, Alberto
    Saad, Fred
    Tilki, Derya
    Graefen, Markus
    Karakiewicz, Pierre, I
    [J]. UROLOGY, 2019, 133 : 135 - 143