The importance of the anterior longitudinal ligament in lumbar disc arthroplasty: 36-Month follow-up experience in extreme lateral total disc replacement

被引:19
|
作者
Marchi, Luis [1 ]
Oliveira, Leonardo [1 ]
Coutinho, Etevaldo [1 ]
Pimenta, Luiz [1 ]
机构
[1] Santa Rita Hosp, Dept Minimally Invas & Reconstruct Spine Surg, Sao Paulo, Brazil
关键词
Arthroplasty; Total disc replacement; XLIF; Minimally invasive; Lateral approach;
D O I
10.1016/j.ijsp.2011.09.002
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Current total disc replacement (TDR) for lumbar spine requires an anterior approach for implantation but presents inherent limitations, including risks to the abdominal structures, as well as resection of the anterior longitudinal ligament. By approaching the spine laterally, it is possible to preserve the stabilizing ligaments, which are a natural restraint to excessive rotations and translations, and thereby help to minimize facet stresses. This less invasive approach also offers a biomechanical advantage of placement of the device over the ring apophysis bilaterally; importantly, it also offers a greater opportunity for safer revision surgery, if necessary, by avoiding scarring of the anterior vasculature. We present the clinical and radiologic results of a lateral TDR device from a prospective single-center study. Methods: A new metal-on-metal TDR device designed for implantation through a true lateral, retroperitoneal, transpsoatic approach (extreme lateral interbody fusion) was implanted in 36 patients with discography-confirmed 1 - or 2-level degenerative disc disease. Clinical (pain and function) and radiographic (range of motion) outcome assessments were prospectively collected preoperatively, postoperatively, and serially up to a minimum of 36 months' follow-up. Results: Between December 2005 and December 2006, 36 surgeries were performed in 16 men and 20 women (mean age, 42.6 years). These included 15 single-level TDR procedures at L3-4 or L4-5, 3 2-level TDR procedures spanning L3-4 and L4-5, and 18 hybrid procedures (anterior lumbar interbody fusion) at L5-S1 and TDR at L4-5 (17) or L3-4 (1). Operative time averaged 130 minutes, with mean blood loss of 60 mL and no intraoperative complications. Postoperative X-rays showed good device placement, with restoration of disc height, foraminal volume, and sagittal balance. All patients were up and walking within 12 hours of surgery, and all but 9 were discharged the next day (7 of those 9 were hybrid TDR-anterior lumbar interbody fusion cases). Postoperatively, 5 of 36 patients (13.8%) had psoas weakness and 3 of 36 (8.3%) had anterior thigh numbness, with both symptoms resolving within 2 weeks. Of the 36 patients, 4 (11%) had postoperative facet joint pain, all in hybrid cases. Visual analog scale pain scores and Oswestry Disability Index scores improved by 74.5% and 69.2%, respectively, from preoperatively to 3-year follow-up. Range of motion at 3 years postoperatively averaged 8.1(circle). Signals of heterotopic ossification were present in 5 patients (13.9%), and 2 patients (5.5%) were considered to have fusion after 36 months. Conclusions: The clinical and radiographic results of a laterally placed TDR have shown maintenance of pain relief and functional improvement over a long-term follow-up period. The benefits of the lateral access-minimal morbidity, avoidance of mobilization of the great vessels, preservation of the anterior longitudinal ligament, biomechanically stable orientation, and broader revision options-promote a new option for motion-preservation procedures. (C) 2012 ISASS - International Society for the Advancement of Spine Surgery. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:18 / 23
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Lumbar Total Disc Replacement by the Lateral Approach-Up to 10 Years Follow-Up
    Pokorny, Gabriel
    Marchi, Luis
    Amaral, Rodrigo
    Jensen, Rubens
    Pimenta, Luiz
    [J]. WORLD NEUROSURGERY, 2019, 122 : E325 - E333
  • [2] Lumbar total disc replacement from an extreme lateral approach clinical experience with a minimum of 2 years' follow-up Clinical article
    Pimenta, Luiz
    Oliveira, Leonardo
    Schaffa, Thomas
    Coutinho, Etevaldo
    Marchi, Luis
    [J]. JOURNAL OF NEUROSURGERY-SPINE, 2011, 14 (01) : 38 - 45
  • [3] Lumbar total disc replacement - Seven to eleven-year follow-up
    Tripiano, P
    Huang, RC
    Girardi, FP
    Cammisa, FP
    Marnay, T
    [J]. JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, 2005, 87A (03): : 490 - 496
  • [4] Revision and retrieval lumbar total disc replacement: Prospective 4-year follow-up study using the CHARITE total disc replacement
    Pimenta, Luiz
    Diaz, Roberto C.
    Nicola, Hazem
    Guerrero, Luis E.
    [J]. NEUROSURGERY, 2006, 59 (02) : 460 - 461
  • [5] Resect or not to resect: the role of posterior longitudinal ligament in lumbar total disc replacement
    Balkan Cakir
    Marcus Richter
    Werner Schmoelz
    René Schmidt
    Heiko Reichel
    Hans Joachim Wilke
    [J]. European Spine Journal, 2012, 21 : 592 - 598
  • [6] Resect or not to resect: the role of posterior longitudinal ligament in lumbar total disc replacement
    Cakir, Balkan
    Richter, Marcus
    Schmoelz, Werner
    Schmidt, Rene
    Reichel, Heiko
    Wilke, Hans Joachim
    [J]. EUROPEAN SPINE JOURNAL, 2012, 21 : S592 - S598
  • [7] Commentary: Total disc arthroplasty: careful follow-up is necessary
    Yoon, S. Tim
    [J]. SPINE JOURNAL, 2012, 12 (08): : 705 - 705
  • [8] Adjacent Disc Degeneration After Lumbar Total Disc Replacement or Nonoperative Treatment A Randomized Study with 8-year Follow-up
    Furunes, Havard
    Hellum, Christian
    Espeland, Ansgar
    Brox, Jens Ivar
    Smastuen, Milada Cvancarova
    Berg, Linda
    Storheim, Kjersti
    [J]. SPINE, 2018, 43 (24) : 1695 - 1703
  • [9] Clinical results of Maverick lumbar total disc replacement: Two-year prospective follow-up
    Le Huec, JC
    Mathews, H
    Basso, Y
    Aunoble, S
    Hoste, D
    Bley, B
    Friesem, T
    [J]. ORTHOPEDIC CLINICS OF NORTH AMERICA, 2005, 36 (03) : 315 - +
  • [10] Elastomeric Lumbar Total Disc Replacement: Clinical and Radiological Results With Minimum 84 Months Follow-Up
    Pimenta, Luiz
    Marchi, Luis
    Oliveira, Leonardo
    Nogueira-Neto, Joes
    Coutinho, Etevaldo
    Amaral, Rodrigo
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SPINE SURGERY, 2018, 12 (01): : 49 - 57