Problems, Policies and Politics: making the case for better assistive technology provision in Australia

被引:7
|
作者
Layton, Natasha [1 ]
机构
[1] Deakin Univ, Sch Hlth & Social Dev, Geelong, Vic, Australia
关键词
Assistive technology; consumers; enablers; environmental interventions; policy; politics;
D O I
10.3109/17483107.2014.889229
中图分类号
R49 [康复医学];
学科分类号
100215 ;
摘要
Purpose: Substantial evidence supports assistive technology and environmental adaptations as key enablers to participation. In order to realise the potential of these interventions, they need to be both recognised in policy, and resourced in practice. This paper uses political theory to understand the complexities of assistive technology (AT) policy reform in Australia. AT research will not be influential in improving AT policy without consideration of political drivers. Method: Theories of policy formation are considered, with Kingdon's (2003) theory of multiple streams identified as a useful lens through which to understand government actions. This theory is applied to the case of current AT policy reformulation in Australia. Results: The convergence model of problem identification, policy formulation and political will is found to be an applicable construct with which to evaluate contemporary policy changes. This paper illustrates the cogency of this theory for the field of AT, in the case of Australia's recent disability and aged care reforms. Conclusions: Political theory provides a way of conceptualising the difficulties of consumers and AT practitioners experience in getting therapeutically valid solutions into public policy, and then getting policies prioritised and funded. It is suggested that AT practitioners must comprehend and consider political factors in working towards effective policies to support their practice.
引用
收藏
页码:240 / 244
页数:5
相关论文
共 20 条
  • [1] Assistive technology provision in Australia: Needs and priorities
    Barbara, Anita
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF THERAPY AND REHABILITATION, 2008, 15 (04): : 187 - 187
  • [2] The Policies of Provision of Assistive and Welfare Technology-A Literature Review
    Baudin, Katarina
    Mullersdorf, Maria
    Sundstrom, Angelina
    Gustafsson, Christine
    [J]. SOCIETIES, 2020, 10 (01):
  • [3] Challenges of user-centred assistive technology provision in Australia: shopping without a prescription
    Steel, Emily J.
    Layton, Natasha Ann
    Foster, Michele M.
    Bennett, Sally
    [J]. DISABILITY AND REHABILITATION-ASSISTIVE TECHNOLOGY, 2016, 11 (03) : 235 - 240
  • [4] Identity politics by design: users, markets and the public service provision for assistive technology in Norway
    Ravneberg, Bodil
    [J]. SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF DISABILITY RESEARCH, 2009, 11 (02) : 101 - 115
  • [5] The Duplicity of Choice and Empowerment: Disability Rights Diluted in Australia's Policies on Assistive Technology
    Steel, Emily J.
    [J]. SOCIETIES, 2019, 9 (02):
  • [6] Enablement through provision of assistive technology: case reports of two children with physical disabilities
    Dalton, Cherie
    Hoyt-Hallett, Gillian
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF OCCUPATIONAL THERAPY, 2013, 76 (02) : 108 - 111
  • [7] Reconciling Government Policies and Programs with Public Expectations: The Case of Innovation in Assistive Technology
    Lane, Joseph P.
    [J]. EVERYDAY TECHNOLOGY FOR INDEPENDENCE AND CARE, 2011, 29 : 333 - 339
  • [8] Problems, policy and politics: making sense of Australia's 'ice epidemic'
    Lancaster, Kari
    Ritter, Alison
    Colebatch, Hal
    [J]. POLICY STUDIES, 2014, 35 (02) : 147 - 171
  • [9] A provision framework and software tools to aid the prescription of electronic assistive technology: Results of a case study
    Hawley, MS
    O'Neill, P
    Webb, LH
    [J]. ASSISTIVE TECHNOLOGY ON THE THRESHOLD OF THE NEW MILLENNIUM, 1999, 6 : 728 - 732
  • [10] The impact of partisan politics on migration policies: the case of healthcare provision for refugees by German states
    Wolfgang Günther
    Dennis Kurrek
    Annette Elisabeth Töller
    [J]. Comparative Migration Studies, 9