Comparative Analysis of Earthquake Emergency Response in China and Japan Based on Timeline: 311 Earthquake vs 512 Earthquake

被引:2
|
作者
Du, Xiaoxia [1 ]
Zhang, Jun [1 ]
Xu, Jianhua [1 ]
He, Zhuan [1 ]
Lai, Junyan [1 ]
Li, Yigang [1 ]
Kimura, Reo [2 ]
Hayashi, Haruo [3 ]
Hosokawa, Masafumi [4 ]
Sakurada, Yukihisa [2 ]
机构
[1] CEA, NERSS, 1 Yuquan West St, Beijing, Peoples R China
[2] Hyogo Univ, Sch Human Sci & Environm, Himeji, Hyogo, Japan
[3] Kyoto Univ, Disaster Prevent Res Inst, Res Ctr Disaster Reduct Syst DRS, Kyoto 6110011, Japan
[4] Natl Res Inst Fire & Disaster, Earthquake & Natl Disaster Lab, Tokyo, Japan
关键词
timeline; earthquake; emergency response; comparative analysis;
D O I
10.20965/jdr.2015.p0276
中图分类号
P [天文学、地球科学];
学科分类号
07 ;
摘要
A devastating M(s)8.0 earthquake hit Wenchuan County, Sichuan Province, China, on May 12, 2008. A similarly destructive M(w)9.0 earthquake hit east-coast Miyagi Prefecture, Japan, on March 11, 2011. The governments of both countries took rapid, effective emergency response measures, gaining invaluable experience and learning precious lessons. To compare detailed emergency responses during these earthquakes and share lessons, this paper uses timeline analysis focusing on the levels of the two earthquakes, summarizing key emergency response measures focusing on emergency command center setup and operation, rescue force deployment and dispatch, emergency victim housing and resettlement, and public information reporting and release based on a time sequence. It also comparatively analyzes and sorts their implementation and timing and studies the similarities and differences of the two earthquakes. This paper also analyzes the advantages and disadvantages of emergency response measures taken by both nations, considering the background of emergency management systems to share experiences and provide references on future disaster emergency response work to improve abilities and progress in earthquake response.
引用
收藏
页码:276 / 287
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Introduction to China's Earthquake Emergency Response System
    Jianhong Liang
    Nan Xi
    Jie Liu
    Jingqiong Yang
    Hongbo Shi
    Zhigao Yang
    [J]. Earthquake Science, 2021, 34 (05) : 447 - 459
  • [2] Introduction to China's Earthquake Emergency Response System
    Liang, Jianhong
    Xi, Nan
    Liu, Jie
    Yang, Jingqiong
    Shi, Hongbo
    Yang, Zhigao
    [J]. EARTHQUAKE SCIENCE, 2021, 34 (05) : 447 - 459
  • [3] Experiences in emergency response at the Great East Japan earthquake and tsunami
    Murayama, Yuko
    Sasaki, Jun
    Nishioka, Dai
    [J]. Proceedings of the Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, 2016, 2016-March : 146 - 151
  • [4] Experiences in emergency response at the Great East Japan Earthquake and Tsunami
    Murayama, Yuko
    Sasaki, Jun
    Nishioka, Dai
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE 49TH ANNUAL HAWAII INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON SYSTEM SCIENCES (HICSS 2016), 2016, : 146 - 151
  • [5] Suitability Analysis for the Emergency Shelters Allocation after an Earthquake in Japan
    Akamatsu, Tetsuya
    Yamamoto, Kayoko
    [J]. GEOSCIENCES, 2019, 9 (08):
  • [6] Analysis of the disaster characteristics and emergency response of the Jiuzhaigou earthquake
    Wang, Wei
    Chen, Hong
    Xu, Aihui
    Qu, Minhao
    [J]. NATURAL HAZARDS AND EARTH SYSTEM SCIENCES, 2018, 18 (06) : 1771 - 1783
  • [7] A framework for earthquake emergency response in Iran
    Najafi, M.
    Eshghi, S.
    Eshghi, K.
    [J]. SCIENTIA IRANICA, 2020, 27 (05) : 2604 - 2620
  • [8] Earthquake emergency response scenario simulator
    Naganoh, M
    Taniai, M
    Ikeda, J
    Itoh, N
    [J]. RISK ANALYSIS, 1998, 2 : 157 - 167
  • [9] A framework for earthquake emergency response in Iran
    Najafi, M.
    Eshghi, S.
    Eshghi, K.
    [J]. Scientia Iranica, 2020, 27 (05): : 2604 - 2620
  • [10] Disaster policy and emergency management reforms in China: From Wenchuan earthquake to Jiuzhaigou earthquake
    Hu, Xiangnan
    Naim, Kapucu
    Jia, Shi
    Zhengwei, Zhu
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF DISASTER RISK REDUCTION, 2021, 52