Seasonal increase in nest defense, but not egg rejection, in a cuckoo host

被引:0
|
作者
Bo Zhou [1 ,2 ]
Wei Liang [1 ]
机构
[1] Ministry of Education Key Laboratory for Ecology of Tropical Islands, Key Laboratory of Tropical Animal and Plant Ecology of Hainan Province, College of Life Sciences, Hainan Normal University
[2] Institute of Biological Resources, Jiangxi Academy of Science
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
Q958 [动物生态学和动物地理学];
学科分类号
071012 ; 0713 ;
摘要
The interactions between avian brood parasites and their hosts provide an informative and easy-to-handle system for studying coevolution. Avian brood parasitism reduces the reproductive success of hosts, and thus, hosts have evolved anti-parasitic strategies, such as rejecting parasitic eggs and adopting aggressive nest defense strategies, to avoid the cost brought on by brood parasitism. To test whether host anti-parasitic strategies are adjusted with the risk of being parasitized when the breeding seasons of brood parasites and hosts are not synchronous, we conducted a field experiment assessing nest defense and egg recognition behaviors of the Isabelline Shrike(Lanius isabellinus), a host of the Common Cuckoo(Cuculus canorus). In the local area, the host Isabelline Shrike begins to breed in April, whereas the summer migratory Common Cuckoo migrates to the local area in May and begins to lay parasitic eggs. Results showed that nest defense behaviors of the Isabelline Shrike increases significantly after cuckoo arrival, showing higher aggressiveness to cuckoo dummies, with no significant difference in attack rates among cuckoo, sparrowhawk and dove dummies, but their egg rejection did not change significantly. These results imply that Isabelline Shrikes may adjust their nest defense behavior, but not egg rejection behavior, with seasonality.
引用
收藏
页码:50 / 54
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Seasonal increase in nest defense, but not egg rejection, in a cuckoo host
    Zhou, Bo
    Liang, Wei
    AVIAN RESEARCH, 2024, 15
  • [2] Antagonistic antiparasite defenses:: nest defense and egg rejection in the magpie host of the great spotted cuckoo
    Soler, JJ
    Soler, M
    Pérez-Contreras, T
    Aragón, S
    Moller, AP
    BEHAVIORAL ECOLOGY, 1999, 10 (06) : 707 - 713
  • [3] Seasonal variation in the risk of cuckoo parasitism does not influence nest defense and egg rejection in a population of Daurian redstarts (Phoenicurus auroreus)
    Guixia Wan
    Guo Zhong
    Longwu Wang
    Wei Liang
    Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 2025, 79 (4)
  • [4] Egg rejection from dark cavities: compensation for chromatic changes in nest illumination by a cuckoo host
    Samas, Peter
    Hanley, Daniel
    Capek, Miroslav
    Greenberg, Casey H.
    Pistone, Leah
    Mikulica, Oldrich
    Honza, Marcel
    JOURNAL OF VERTEBRATE BIOLOGY, 2024, 73
  • [5] Social transmission of egg rejection in a cuckoo host
    Yang, Canchao
    Feeney, William E.
    ANIMAL BEHAVIOUR, 2022, 191 : 143 - 148
  • [6] Does nest sanitation elicit egg rejection in an open-cup nesting cuckoo host rejecter?
    Tongping Su
    Chanchao Yang
    Shuihua Chen
    Wei Liang
    Avian Research, 2018, 9 (04) : 294 - 298
  • [7] Does nest sanitation elicit egg rejection in an open-cup nesting cuckoo host rejecter?
    Su, Tongping
    Yang, Chanchao
    Chen, Shuihua
    Liang, Wei
    AVIAN RESEARCH, 2018, 9
  • [8] Egg-spot matching in common cuckoo parasitism of the oriental reed warbler: effects of host nest availability and egg rejection
    Li, Donglai
    Ruan, Yanan
    Wang, Ying
    Chang, Alan K.
    Wan, Dongmei
    Zhang, Zhengwang
    AVIAN RESEARCH, 2016, 7
  • [9] Egg-spot matching in common cuckoo parasitism of the oriental reed warbler: effects of host nest availability and egg rejection
    Donglai Li
    Yanan Ruan
    Ying Wang
    Alan K.Chang
    Dongmei Wan
    Zhengwang Zhang
    Avian Research, 2016, (04) : 199 - 209
  • [10] Nest sanitation facilitates egg recognition in the common tailorbird, a plaintive cuckoo host
    Chang-Zhang Feng
    Can-Chao Yang
    Wei Liang
    Zoological Research, 2019, 40 (05) : 466 - 470