Author Correction: Empirically observed learning rates for concentrating solar power and their responses to regime change

被引:0
|
作者
Johan Lilliestam
Mercè Labordena
Anthony Patt
Stefan Pfenninger
机构
[1] ETH Zürich,Climate Policy Research Group, Institute for Environmental Decisions
来源
Nature Energy | 2019年 / 4卷
关键词
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
In the version of this Analysis originally published, the total learning rate for parabolic trough stations with 6–8 hours of thermal storage (Fig. 2b) was calculated to be 25%. After publication, the authors found a code error that caused the learning curve fit function to believe that the first station in the dataset was marked as 1 GW and not 0 GW. As a result, the estimated learning rates for the complete timespan were too high. The correct learning rates should be 2.7% for Fig. 2a and 6.8% for Fig. 2b (instead of 5.2% and 25.2%, respectively). These learning rate fit curves have been updated and the captions have been corrected. For consistency with Fig. 2a, a fit for 2011–2017 has been added to Fig. 2b, showing a learning rate of 17.5% (R2 = 0.337). The text has been modified in the abstract and the sections ‘Observed investment cost development and learning rates’, ‘Policy regime impacts on cost development’ and ‘Conclusions’ to reflect the quantitative changes to the learning rates. Supplementary Notes 1, 3 and 4 and Supplementary Figs. 2, 6 and 7 and their captions have also been updated to reflect the new learning rates. In the caption of Supplementary Fig. 2b, “(2008–2017 learning rate=0.21, R2=0.468)” has been changed to “(2008–2017 learning rate=0.06, R2=0.513; 2011–2017 learning rate=0.079, R2=0.072)”. In the caption of Supplementary Fig. 6b, “(2008–2017 learning rate=0.289, R2=0.715)” has been changed to “(2008–2017 learning rate=0.077, R2=0.631; 2011–2017 learning rate=0.225, R2=0.498)”. In the caption of Supplementary Fig. 7, “(a) parabolic trough (PT) stations with <1 hour thermal storage (2011–2014 learning rate=0.297, R2=0.972 (US$) and learning rate=0.27, R2=0.909 (€)); and (b) PT stations with 6–8 hours of thermal storage (2008–2017 learning rate=0.252, R2=0.621 (US$) and learning rate=0.138, R2=0.502 (€))” has been changed to “(a) parabolic trough (PT) stations with <1 hour thermal storage (2011–2014 learning rate=0.297, R2=0.972 (US$) and 2011–2014 learning rate=0.27, R2=0.909 (€)); and (b) PT stations with 6-8 hours of thermal storage (2011–2017 learning rate=0.175, R2=0.337 (US$) and 2011–2017 learning rate=0.072, R2=0.149 (€))”. The underlying data were correct as originally published and remain unchanged.
引用
收藏
页码:424 / 426
页数:2
相关论文
共 24 条
  • [1] Empirically observed learning rates for concentrating solar power and their responses to regime change
    Lilliestam, Johan
    Labordena, Merce
    Patt, Anthony
    Pfenninger, Stefan
    [J]. NATURE ENERGY, 2017, 2 (07):
  • [2] Empirically observed learning rates for concentrating solar power and their responses to regime change
    Johan Lilliestam
    Mercè Labordena
    Anthony Patt
    Stefan Pfenninger
    [J]. Nature Energy, 2
  • [3] Empirically observed learning rates for concentrating solar power and their responses to regime change (vol 2, pg 17094, 2017)
    Lilliestam, Johan
    Labordena, Merce
    Patt, Anthony
    Pfenninger, Stefan
    [J]. NATURE ENERGY, 2019, 4 (05) : 424 - 426
  • [4] Concentrating solar power: Still small but learning fast
    Robert Pitz-Paal
    [J]. Nature Energy, 2
  • [5] Author Correction: Widespread but heterogeneous responses of Andean forests to climate change
    Belén Fadrique
    Selene Báez
    Álvaro Duque
    Agustina Malizia
    Cecilia Blundo
    Julieta Carilla
    Oriana Osinaga-Acosta
    Lucio Malizia
    Miles Silman
    William Farfán-Ríos
    Yadvinder Malhi
    Kenneth R. Young
    Cuesta C. Francisco
    Jurgen Homeier
    Manuel Peralvo
    Esteban Pinto
    Oswaldo Jadan
    Nikolay Aguirre
    Zhofre Aguirre
    Kenneth J. Feeley
    [J]. Nature, 2019, 565 : E10 - E10
  • [6] Author Correction: The effect of training intensity on implicit learning rates in schizophrenia
    Natasza D. Orlov
    Jessica Sanderson
    Syed Ali Muqtadir
    Anastasia K. Kalpakidou
    Panayiota G. Michalopoulou
    Jie Lu
    Sukhi S. Shergill
    [J]. Scientific Reports, 11
  • [7] Author Correction: Organic Power Electronics: Transistor Operation in the kA/cm2 Regime
    Markus P. Klinger
    Axel Fischer
    Felix Kaschura
    Johannes Widmer
    Bahman Kheradmand-Boroujeni
    Frank Ellinger
    Karl Leo
    [J]. Scientific Reports, 10
  • [8] Electricity Generation Forecasting in Concentrating Solar-Thermal Power Plants with Ensemble Learning
    Melara, A.
    Torres, J. F.
    Troncoso, A.
    Martinez-Alvarez, F.
    [J]. 16TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON SOFT COMPUTING MODELS IN INDUSTRIAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL APPLICATIONS (SOCO 2021), 2022, 1401 : 665 - 674
  • [9] A general thermodynamic model for eutectics of phase change molten salts in concentrating solar power applications
    Tripi, Valerio
    Sau, Salvatore
    Tizzoni, Anna Chiara
    Mansi, Emiliana
    Spadoni, Annarita
    Corsaro, Natale
    D'Ottavi, Cadia
    Capocelli, Mauro
    Licoccia, Silvia
    Delise, Tiziano
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ENERGY STORAGE, 2021, 33
  • [10] A general thermodynamic model for eutectics of phase change molten salts in concentrating solar power applications
    Tripi V.
    Sau S.
    Tizzoni A.C.
    Mansi E.
    Spadoni A.
    Corsaro N.
    D'Ottavi C.
    Capocelli M.
    Licoccia S.
    Delise T.
    [J]. Journal of Energy Storage, 2021, 33