Transobturator slings for stress incontinence: using urodynamic parameters to predict outcomes

被引:0
|
作者
N. L. Guerette
J. F. Bena
G. W. Davila
机构
[1] Cleveland Clinic Florida,Department of Gynecology, Section of Urogynecology and Reconstructive Pelvic Surgery
[2] Cleveland Clinic Foundation Department of Biostatistics,undefined
来源
关键词
Transobturator sling; Monarc™; Stress incontinence; Urethral function; Urethral pressure profile; Valsalva leak point pressure;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the ability of preoperative urodynamic urethral function parameters to predict the success rate of transobturator slings (TOS). Seventy women urodynamically diagnosed with stress incontinence with urethral hypermobility underwent a Monarc™ TOS (American Medical Systems, Minnetonka, USA). Postoperative continence status was correlated with preoperative urodynamic urethral function parameters. Mathematical modeling was used to determine whether urodynamic parameters can be used to predict postoperative continence. Average follow-up was 8.1 (6–12) months; 56 (80%) patients were continent based on a standardized stress test and subjective report. The median Valsalva leak point pressure at 150 cc (VLPP150) in the failures and successes was not different (p = 0.12). The median VLPP at cystometric capacity (VLPPcap) in the failures was 32 cmH2O compared to 71 cmH2O in the successes (p < 0.001). The maximum urethral closure pressure (MUCP) had a median of 20 cmH2O in the failures and 45 cmH2O in the successful patients (p < 0.001). No correlation existed between the degree of urethral hypermobility, as measured by the cotton swab test, and surgical success (p = 0.17). There was no correlation between level of preoperative urethral function and persistent overactive bladder symptoms, post-void residual, voids/day, and nocturia. Using a combined model, the cutoff values of VLPPcap > 60 cmH2O and MUCP > 40 cmH2O were the most predictive of surgical success, revealing a sensitivity of 83% (0.55, 0.95) and specificity of 79% (0.67, 0.88). A combination of urodynamic parameters can be used to predict continence rates after a TOS. A TOS should be used with caution in women with impaired urethral function.
引用
收藏
页码:97 / 102
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Transobturator slings for stress incontinence: using urodynamic parameters to predict outcomes
    Guerette, N. L.
    Bena, J. F.
    Davila, G. W.
    INTERNATIONAL UROGYNECOLOGY JOURNAL, 2008, 19 (01) : 97 - 102
  • [2] DURABLE OUTCOMES USING ADVANCE TRANSOBTURATOR MALE SLINGS FOR MILD STRESS URINARY INCONTINENCE
    Zuckerman, Jack
    Edwards, Brooke
    McCammon, Kurt
    NEUROUROLOGY AND URODYNAMICS, 2014, 33 (02) : 246 - 246
  • [3] Comparison of two outside-in transobturator midurethral slings in the treatment of female urodynamic stress incontinence
    Huang, Wen-Chen
    Yang, Jenn-Ming
    TAIWANESE JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY, 2022, 61 (06): : 1004 - 1008
  • [4] Transobturator Slings for Female Stress Urinary Incontinence
    Sousa, Ana
    Jesus, Andre
    Carvalho, Maria
    Carvalho, Giselda
    Marques, Joao
    Falcao, Francisco
    Torgal, Isabel
    ACTA MEDICA PORTUGUESA, 2014, 27 (04) : 422 - 427
  • [5] Transobturator slings for stress incontinence and intrinsic sphincter deficiency
    Davila, GW
    Guerette, NL
    OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2005, 105 (04): : 123S - 124S
  • [6] Retropubic versus Transobturator Midurethral Slings for Stress Incontinence
    Richter, Holly E.
    Albo, Michael E.
    Zyczynski, Halina M.
    Kenton, Kimberly
    Norton, Peggy A.
    Sirls, Larry T.
    Kraus, Stephen R.
    Chai, Toby C.
    Lemack, Gary E.
    Dandreo, Kimberly J.
    Varner, R. Edward
    Menefee, Shawn
    Ghetti, Chiara
    Brubaker, Linda
    Nygaard, Ingrid
    Khandwala, Salil
    Rozanski, Thomas A.
    Johnson, Harry
    Schaffer, Joseph
    Stoddard, Anne M.
    Holley, Robert L.
    Nager, Charles W.
    Moalli, Pamela
    Mueller, Elizabeth
    Arisco, Amy M.
    Corton, Marlene
    Tennstedt, Sharon
    Chang, T. Debuene
    Gormley, E. Ann
    Litman, Heather J.
    NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2010, 362 (22): : 2066 - 2076
  • [7] Comparison of the clinical outcomes of transobturator and single-incision slings for stress urinary incontinence
    Wu, Ling-Ying
    Yang, Tsai-Hwa
    Kung, Fu-Tsai
    Chuang, Fei-Chi
    Huang, Kuan-Hui
    KAOHSIUNG JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCES, 2016, 32 (07): : 367 - 372
  • [8] Re: Retropubic Versus Transobturator Midurethral Slings for Stress Incontinence
    Richter, H. E.
    Albo, M. E.
    Zyczynski, H. M.
    Kenton, K.
    Norton, P. A.
    Sirls, L. T.
    Kraus, S. R.
    Chai, T. C.
    Lemack, G. E.
    Dandreo, K. J.
    Varner, R. E.
    Menefee, S.
    Ghetti, C.
    Brubaker, L.
    Nygaard, I.
    Khandwala, S.
    Rozanski, T. A.
    Johnson, H.
    Schaffer, J.
    Stoddard, A. M.
    Holley, R. L.
    Nager, C. W.
    Moalli, P.
    Mueller, E.
    Arisco, A. M.
    Corton, M.
    Tennstedt, S.
    Chang, T. D.
    Gormley, E. A.
    Litman, H. J.
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2012, 187 (01): : 202 - 202
  • [10] Transobturator Midurethral Slings versus Single-Incision Slings for Stress Incontinence in Overweight Patients
    Bayrak, Omer
    Seckiner, Ilker
    Urgun, Gokhan
    Sen, Haluk
    Ozcan, Caglayan
    Erturhan, Sakip
    INTERNATIONAL BRAZ J UROL, 2015, 41 (04): : 714 - 721