Current Psoriasis Efficacy Outcome Measures in Clinical Trials

被引:4
|
作者
Wechter T. [1 ]
Heath M. [1 ]
Aung-Din D. [1 ]
Sahni D. [1 ]
Cline A. [1 ]
Feldman S.R. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Center for Research, Department of Dermatology, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Medical Center Boulevard, Winston-Salem, 27157-1071, NC
[2] Department of Pathology, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC
[3] Department of Social Sciences & Health Policy, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC
关键词
DLQI; Outcome measures; PASI; Psoriasis;
D O I
10.1007/s13671-018-0237-6
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Purpose of Review: This review sought to examine currently used psoriasis efficacy outcome measures. In particular, we wanted to know what outcome measures are currently being used most frequently, in addition to the advantages and disadvantages of each outcome measure. Recent Findings: In the past year, Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) was the most frequently used outcome measure in phase III and IV clinical trials evaluating psoriasis treatments. PASI scores were also the most frequently used primary outcome measure. Psoriasis Scalp Severity Index (PSSI) was the most commonly utilized regional physician reported outcome measure and Dermatology Quality of Life Index (DLQI) was the most commonly used patient reported outcome. Summary: It is important for clinical trials to utilize outcome measures that are both accurate and take into account patients’ perspectives. Standardization of outcome measures will allow for better comparison of treatments across clinical trials. © 2018, Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature.
引用
收藏
页码:261 / 268
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] CLINICAL OUTCOME MEASURES OF PSORIASIS
    Bonifati, C.
    Berardesca, E.
    [J]. REUMATISMO, 2007, 59 : 64 - 67
  • [2] Review of Outcome Measures in Trials and Practice for Psoriasis
    Kamrani, Payvand
    Bashyam, Arjun M.
    Feldman, Steven R.
    [J]. CURRENT DERMATOLOGY REPORTS, 2019, 8 (04) : 313 - 318
  • [3] Clinical trials in AD: Are current formats and outcome measures adequate?
    Ferris, SH
    [J]. ALZHEIMER DISEASE & ASSOCIATED DISORDERS, 2002, 16 : S13 - S17
  • [4] Review of Outcome Measures in Trials and Practice for Psoriasis
    Payvand Kamrani
    Arjun M. Bashyam
    Steven R. Feldman
    [J]. Current Dermatology Reports, 2019, 8 : 313 - 318
  • [5] Assessment of outcome in clinical trials of gouta review of current measures
    Taylor, W. J.
    Schumacher, H. R., Jr.
    Singh, J. A.
    Grainger, R.
    Dalbeth, N.
    [J]. RHEUMATOLOGY, 2007, 46 (12) : 1751 - 1756
  • [6] Outcome measures in clinical trials
    Heyse, JF
    [J]. STATISTICAL METHODS IN MEDICAL RESEARCH, 2004, 13 (02) : 87 - 87
  • [7] Current Clinical Trials in Dry AMD and the Definition of Appropriate Clinical Outcome Measures
    Yehoshua, Zohar
    Rosenfeld, Philip J.
    Albini, Thomas A.
    [J]. SEMINARS IN OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2011, 26 (03) : 167 - 180
  • [8] Blue Cone Monochromacy: Visual Function and Efficacy Outcome Measures for Clinical Trials
    Luo, Xunda
    Cideciyan, Artur V.
    Iannaccone, Alessandro
    Roman, Alejandro J.
    Ditta, Lauren C.
    Jennings, Barbara J.
    Yatsenko, Svetlana A.
    Sheplock, Rebecca
    Sumaroka, Alexander
    Swider, Malgorzata
    Schwartz, Sharon B.
    Wissinger, Bernd
    Kohl, Susanne
    Jacobson, Samuel G.
    [J]. PLOS ONE, 2015, 10 (04):
  • [9] Efficacy Outcome Measures for Procedural Sedation Clinical Trials in Adults: An ACTTION Systematic Review
    Williams, Mark R.
    McKeown, Andrew
    Dexter, Franklin
    Miner, James R.
    Sessler, Daniel I.
    Vargo, John
    Turk, Dennis C.
    Dworkin, Robert H.
    [J]. ANESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA, 2016, 122 (01): : 152 - 170
  • [10] Efficacy Outcome Measures for Pediatric Procedural Sedation Clinical Trials: An ACTTION Systematic Review
    Williams, Mark R.
    Nayshtut, Michael
    Hoefnagel, Amie
    McKeown, Andrew
    Carlson, Douglas W.
    Cravero, Joseph
    Lightdale, Jenifer
    Mason, Keira P.
    Wilson, Stephen
    Turk, Dennis C.
    Dworkin, Robert H.
    Ward, Denham S.
    [J]. ANESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA, 2018, 126 (03): : 956 - 967