Managing complexity of assembly with modularity: a cost and benefit analysis

被引:0
|
作者
Shraga Shoval
Mahmoud Efatmaneshnik
机构
[1] Ariel University,Department of Industrial Engineering and Management
[2] UNSW Canberra at ADFA,School of Engineering and Information Technology
关键词
Modularity; Sequencing; Assembly; System complexity; Probabilistic modeling;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Industry 4.0 is characterized by a modular structure of the production process that consists of cyber-physical systems. These cyber-physical systems provide interoperability, information transparency, and decentralization of decisions. The modular structure, according to Industry 4.0 principle, creates intelligent networks of machines, work pieces, and systems that can predict failures, self-organize themselves, and react to unexpected events. In this paper, we consider the complexity of assembly processes and propose modular structures for assembly processes based on probabilistic formulation. Despite the reliability and precisions that the use of cyber-physical systems such as robotics and automation in assembly processes have introduced, and because of the increasing complexity, there is a need for probabilistic process characterization models for smart assembly planning purposes. First, a new framework for assembly complexity measurement based on processes’ probabilistic and Markovian characters is suggested. Then, two effects of modularization, namely stabilization of components by boundary creation and application modular interfaces, are analyzed. For each case, a probabilistic formulation for assembly formation and analysis is presented. The effect of task sequencing and component modularization on assembly time and cost is considered simultaneously by the Bayesian formulation of the assembly problem. Several heuristics are derived from simulation examples, and the modularization cost is studied through utilization of design structure matrix.
引用
收藏
页码:3815 / 3828
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Managing complexity of assembly with modularity: a cost and benefit analysis
    Shoval, Shraga
    Efatmaneshnik, Mahmoud
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ADVANCED MANUFACTURING TECHNOLOGY, 2019, 105 (09): : 3815 - 3828
  • [2] Modularity and the cost of complexity
    Welch, JJ
    Waxman, D
    [J]. EVOLUTION, 2003, 57 (08) : 1723 - 1734
  • [3] Self-assembly, modularity, and physical complexity
    Ahnert, S. E.
    Johnston, I. G.
    Fink, T. M. A.
    Doye, J. P. K.
    Louis, A. A.
    [J]. PHYSICAL REVIEW E, 2010, 82 (02):
  • [4] SELF-ASSEMBLY, MODULARITY AND PHYSICAL COMPLEXITY
    Ahnert, S. E.
    [J]. SCIENCE: IMAGE IN ACTION, 2012, : 189 - 194
  • [5] Managing airlines: the cost of complexity
    Trapote-Barreira, Cesar
    Deutschmann, Andreas
    Robuste, Francesc
    [J]. EFFICIENT, SAFE AND INTELLIGENT TRANSPORT, 2016, 18 : 297 - 304
  • [6] Managing airlines: the cost of complexity
    Trapote-Barreira, Cesar
    Deutschmann, Andreas
    Robuste, Francesc
    [J]. XII CONGRESO DE INGENIERIA DEL TRANSPORTE, 2016, : 25 - 35
  • [7] Managing avalanches using cost-benefit-risk analysis
    Larsson-Kraik, Per-Olof
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE INSTITUTION OF MECHANICAL ENGINEERS PART F-JOURNAL OF RAIL AND RAPID TRANSIT, 2012, 226 (F6) : 641 - 649
  • [8] Best design granularity to balance assembly complexity and product modularity
    AlGeddawy, T.
    Samy, S. N.
    ElMaraghy, H.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ENGINEERING DESIGN, 2017, 28 (7-9) : 457 - 479
  • [9] Managing Functional Coupling Sequence to Decrease Complexity and Increase Modularity in Conceptual Design
    Wang, Chu-Yi
    Lu, Stephen C-Y
    [J]. THE 12TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON AXIOMATIC DESIGN (ICAD 2018), 2018, 223
  • [10] Judicial Review of SEC Rules: Managing the Costs of Cost-Benefit Analysis
    Benedict, Rachel A.
    [J]. MINNESOTA LAW REVIEW, 2012, 97 (01) : 278 - 305