Screening investigations in small-for-gestational-age near-term and term infants

被引:0
|
作者
Mohan B. Krishnamurthy
Abigail Popiel
Atul Malhotra
机构
[1] Monash Children’s Hospital,Monash Newborn
[2] Monash University,Department of Paediatrics
[3] Monash University,Monash Newborn
[4] Monash Children’s Hospital,undefined
来源
关键词
IUGR; Cranial ultrasound; Karyotype; Cytomegalovirus;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
The aims of this study are to examine how frequently near-term and term small-for-gestational-age (SGA) infants were investigated in our clinical practice, whether being born less than the third centile for weight increased the yield of positive investigations, and whether there were additional characteristics in infants with positive investigations. This retrospective cohort study was compiled using a database of a large maternity network, using the search near term and term gestational age (greater than or equal to 35 weeks) over a span of 4 years. SGA babies were further filtered into less than the tenth centile and third centile. Out of a population of 30,461 infants in the study period, 3437 (11.3%) SGA infants were identified. Four hundred fifteen SGA infants (12.1%) underwent screening investigations, of which 49 infants (11.8%) yielded a positive investigation. 27.2% of karyotypes, 12.8% of cranial ultrasounds and 0.4% of urine CMV tests showed positive results in < 10th centile group. Being born less than the third centile for weight did not increase the yield of positive investigations. Most infants with positive investigations had an additional maternal or neonatal characteristic or risk factor present.
引用
收藏
页码:1707 / 1712
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Screening investigations in small-for-gestational-age near-term and term infants
    Krishnamurthy, Mohan B.
    Popiel, Abigail
    Malhotra, Atul
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PEDIATRICS, 2017, 176 (12) : 1707 - 1712
  • [2] Neurodevelopmental outcomes of near-term small-for-gestational-age infants with and without signs of placental underperfusion
    Parra-Saavedra, Miguel
    Crovetto, Francesca
    Triunfo, Stefania
    Savchev, Stefan
    Peguero, Anna
    Nadal, Alfons
    Parra, Guido
    Gratacos, Eduard
    Figueras, Francesc
    PLACENTA, 2014, 35 (04) : 269 - 274
  • [3] PLACENTAL SIZE OF SMALL-FOR-GESTATIONAL-AGE INFANTS AT TERM
    WOODS, DL
    MALAN, AF
    DEVONHESSE, H
    EARLY HUMAN DEVELOPMENT, 1982, 7 (01) : 11 - 15
  • [4] SMALL-FOR-GESTATIONAL-AGE INFANTS
    WATT, J
    NEW ZEALAND MEDICAL JOURNAL, 1989, 102 (879) : 594 - 594
  • [5] THE OUTCOME OF FULL-TERM SMALL-FOR-GESTATIONAL-AGE INFANTS IN LATE ADOLESCENCE
    SEIDMAN, DS
    PAZ, I
    DANON, YL
    LAOR, A
    MASHIACH, S
    STEVENSON, DK
    GALE, R
    CLINICAL RESEARCH, 1992, 40 (01): : A98 - A98
  • [6] COMPARATIVE GLYCEMIC RESPONSES TO ALANINE IN NORMAL TERM AND SMALL-FOR-GESTATIONAL-AGE INFANTS
    MESTYAN, J
    SCHULTZ, K
    HORVATH, M
    JOURNAL OF PEDIATRICS, 1974, 85 (02): : 276 - 278
  • [7] SMALL-FOR-GESTATIONAL-AGE INFANTS
    BRYSON, JG
    NEW ZEALAND MEDICAL JOURNAL, 1989, 102 (878) : 564 - 564
  • [8] Using fetal abdominal circumference growth velocity in the prediction of adverse outcome in near-term small-for-gestational-age fetuses
    Cavallaro, A.
    Veglia, M.
    Svirko, E.
    Vannuccini, S.
    Volpe, G.
    Impey, L.
    ULTRASOUND IN OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY, 2018, 52 (04) : 494 - 500
  • [9] Safety of misoprostol for near-term and term induction in small-for-gestational-age pregnancies compared to dinoprostone and primary cesarean section: results of a retrospective cohort study
    Joscha Steetskamp
    Elisabeth Bachmann
    Annette Hasenburg
    Marco Johannes Battista
    Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics, 2020, 302 : 1369 - 1374
  • [10] Safety of misoprostol for near-term and term induction in small-for-gestational-age pregnancies compared to dinoprostone and primary cesarean section: results of a retrospective cohort study
    Steetskamp, Joscha
    Bachmann, Elisabeth
    Hasenburg, Annette
    Battista, Marco Johannes
    ARCHIVES OF GYNECOLOGY AND OBSTETRICS, 2020, 302 (06) : 1369 - 1374