In vitro evaluation of various bioabsorbable and nonresorbable barrier membranes for guided tissue regeneration

被引:77
|
作者
Kasaj A. [1 ]
Reichert C. [1 ]
Götz H. [2 ]
Röhrig B. [3 ]
Smeets R. [4 ]
Willershausen B. [1 ]
机构
[1] Department of Operative Dentistry and Periodontology, Johannes Gutenberg University, Mainz
[2] Institute of Applied Structure and Microanalysis, Medical Faculty, Johannes Gutenberg University, Mainz
[3] Institute for Medical Biostatistics, Epidemiology and Informatics, Johannes Gutenberg University, Mainz
[4] Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Aachen University
关键词
Collagen Membrane; Gingival Fibroblast; Human Gingival Fibroblast; Guide Tissue Regeneration; Alamar Blue Assay;
D O I
10.1186/1746-160X-4-22
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Background. Different types of bioabsorbable and nonresorbable membranes have been widely used for guided tissue regeneration (GTR) with its ultimate goal of regenerating lost periodontal structures. The purpose of the present study was to evaluate the biological effects of various bioabsorbable and nonresorbable membranes in cultures of primary human gingival fibroblasts (HGF), periodontal ligament fibroblasts (PDLF) and human osteoblast-like (HOB) cells in vitro. Methods. Three commercially available collagen membranes [TutoDent® (TD), Resodont® (RD) and BioGide® (BG)] as well as three nonresorbable polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) membranes [ACE (AC), Cytoplast® (CT) and TefGen-FD® (TG)] were tested. Cells plated on culture dishes (CD) served as positive controls. The effect of the barrier membranes on HGF, PDLF as well as HOB cells was assessed by the Alamar Blue fluorometric proliferation assay after 1, 2.5, 4, 24 and 48 h time periods. The structural and morphological properties of the membranes were evaluated by scanning electron microscopy (SEM). Results. The results showed that of the six barriers tested, TD and RD demonstrated the highest rate of HGF proliferation at both earlier (1 h) and later (48 h) time periods (P < 0.001) compared to all other tested barriers and CD. Similarly, TD, RD and BG had significantly higher numbers of cells at all time periods when compared with the positive control in PDLF culture (P ≤; 0.001). In HOB cell culture, the highest rate of cell proliferation was also calculated for TD at all time periods (P < 0.001). SEM observations demonstrated a microporous structure of all collagen membranes, with a compact top surface and a porous bottom surface, whereas the nonresorbable PTFE membranes demonstrated a homogenous structure with a symmetric dense skin layer. Conclusion. Results from the present study suggested that GTR membrane materials, per se, may influence cell proliferation in the process of periodontal tissue/bone regeneration. Among the six membranes examined, the bioabsorbable membranes demonstrated to be more suitable to stimulate cellular proliferation compared to nonresorbable PTFE membranes. © 2008 Kasaj et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.
引用
收藏
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Vascular response to guided tissue regeneration procedures using nonresorbable and bioabsorbable membranes in dogs
    Vergara, JA
    Quinones, CR
    Nasjleti, CE
    Caffesse, RG
    JOURNAL OF PERIODONTOLOGY, 1997, 68 (03) : 217 - 224
  • [2] Permeability evaluation of membranes for guided tissue regeneration membranes in vitro
    Chang, WJ
    Wu, CH
    Wang, CY
    Chiu, IL
    Lee, SY
    Lin, CT
    JOURNAL OF DENTAL RESEARCH, 1998, 77 : 999 - 999
  • [3] Guided tissue regeneration with bioabsorbable and expanded polytetrafluoroethylene barrier membranes in the treatment of naturally occurring periodontal defects in dogs
    Elharar, F
    Rodriguez, HJ
    Benqué, EP
    Caffesse, RG
    JOURNAL OF PERIODONTOLOGY, 1998, 69 (11) : 1218 - 1228
  • [4] Guided bone regeneration using resorbable and nonresorbable membranes: A histologic evaluation in beagle dogs
    Al Salamah, L
    Babay, N
    JOURNAL OF DENTAL RESEARCH, 2000, 79 (05) : 1279 - 1279
  • [5] MICROORGANISMS IN POLYTETRAFLUOROETHYLENE BARRIER MEMBRANES FOR GUIDED TISSUE REGENERATION
    NOWZARI, H
    SLOTS, J
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PERIODONTOLOGY, 1994, 21 (03) : 203 - 210
  • [6] Guided bone regeneration with novel bioabsorbable membranes
    Koyama, Y
    Kikuchi, M
    Yamada, T
    Kanaya, T
    Matsumoto, HN
    Takakuda, K
    JSME INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL SERIES C-MECHANICAL SYSTEMS MACHINE ELEMENTS AND MANUFACTURING, 2003, 46 (04) : 1409 - 1416
  • [7] GUIDED TISSUE REGENERATION - COMPARISON OF BIOABSORBABLE AND NON-BIOABSORBABLE MEMBRANES - HISTOLOGIC AND HISTOMETRIC STUDY IN DOGS
    CAFFESSE, RG
    NASJLETI, CE
    MORRISON, EC
    SANCHEZ, R
    JOURNAL OF PERIODONTOLOGY, 1994, 65 (06) : 583 - 591
  • [8] Cell permeability of guided tissue regeneration membranes in vitro
    Chang, WJ
    Wang, CY
    Huang, HM
    Wu, CH
    Lee, SY
    Lin, CT
    Hsich, KJ
    JOURNAL OF DENTAL RESEARCH, 2000, 79 : 311 - 311
  • [9] Cell permeability of guided tissue regeneration membranes in vitro
    Chang, WJ
    Wang, CY
    Huang, HM
    Wu, CH
    Lee, SY
    Lin, CT
    Hsieh, KJ
    JOURNAL OF DENTAL RESEARCH, 2001, 80 (04) : 1387 - 1387
  • [10] Fabrication of bioabsorbable scaffolds for guided tissue regeneration
    Haar, ME
    Shea, LD
    Harris, LD
    Franceschi, RT
    Mooney, DJ
    JOURNAL OF DENTAL RESEARCH, 1998, 77 : 302 - 302