Democracy, epistemic agency, and AI: political epistemology in times of artificial intelligence

被引:9
|
作者
Mark Coeckelbergh
机构
[1] University of Vienna,Department of Philosophy
来源
AI and Ethics | 2023年 / 3卷 / 4期
关键词
Democracy; Political epistemology; Epistemic agency; Artificial intelligence; Epistemic bubbles; Fake news;
D O I
10.1007/s43681-022-00239-4
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Democratic theories assume that citizens have some form of political knowledge in order to vote for representatives or to directly engage in democratic deliberation and participation. However, apart from widespread attention to the phenomenon of fake news and misinformation, less attention has been paid to how they are supposed to acquire that knowledge in contexts shaped by artificial intelligence and related digital technologies. While this topic can also be approached from an empirical angle, this paper contributes to supporting concerns about AI and democracy by looking at the issue through the lens of political epistemology, in particular using the concept of epistemic agency. It argues that artificial intelligence (AI) endangers democracy since it risks to diminish the epistemic agency of citizens and thereby undermine the relevant kind of political agency in democracy. It shows that next to fake news and manipulation by means of AI analysis of big data, epistemic bubbles and the defaulting of statistical knowledge endanger the epistemic agency of citizens when they form and wish to revise their political beliefs. AI risks to undermine trust in one’s own epistemic capacities and hinder the exercise of those capacities. If we want to protect the knowledge basis of our democracies, we must address these problems in education and technology policy.
引用
收藏
页码:1341 / 1350
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Climate change and the political pathways of AI: The technocracy-democracy dilemma in light of artificial intelligence and human agency
    Coeckelbergh, Mark
    Saetra, Henrik Skaug
    [J]. TECHNOLOGY IN SOCIETY, 2023, 75
  • [2] THE EPISTEMOLOGY OF DEMOCRACY: THE EPISTEMIC VIRTUES OF DEMOCRACY
    Samarzija, Snjezana Prijic
    [J]. PHILOSOPHY AND SOCIETY-FILOZOFIJA I DRUSTVO, 2020, 31 (01): : 56 - 70
  • [3] ALGORITHMIC DEMOCRACY: ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE, DEMOCRACY AND POLITICAL PARTICIPATION
    Castellanos Claramunt, Jorge
    [J]. REVISTA GENERAL DE DERECHO ADMINISTRATIVO, 2019, (50):
  • [4] Human Goals Are Constitutive of Agency in Artificial Intelligence (AI)
    Popa E.
    [J]. Philosophy & Technology, 2021, 34 (4) : 1731 - 1750
  • [5] The epistemic impossibility of an artificial intelligence take-over of democracy
    Innerarity, Daniel
    [J]. AI & SOCIETY, 2024, 39 (04) : 1667 - 1671
  • [6] Virtue Epistemology and the 'Epistemic Fitness' of Democracy
    Farrelly, Colin
    [J]. POLITICAL STUDIES REVIEW, 2012, 10 (01) : 7 - 22
  • [7] Artificial Intelligence for the Internal Democracy of Political Parties
    Novelli, Claudio
    Formisano, Giuliano
    Juneja, Prathm
    Sandri, Giulia
    Floridi, Luciano
    [J]. MINDS AND MACHINES, 2024, 34 (04)
  • [8] What are the political and epistemic aspects of political epistemology?
    Rodriguez, Fernando Broncano
    [J]. LOGOS-ANALES DEL SEMINARIO DE METAFISICA, 2024, 57 (01): : 201 - 218
  • [9] ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE (AI) SOFTWARE IMPROVING TIMES TO THROMBECTOMY
    Sevilis, T.
    Fowler, M.
    Avila, A.
    Heath, G.
    Boyd, C.
    Gao, L.
    Collins, O.
    Ayub, H.
    Devlin, T.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF STROKE, 2023, 18 (03) : 40 - 41
  • [10] Could Artificial Intelligence (AI) Become a Responsible Agent: Artificial Agency (AA)?
    Noble, Raymond
    Noble, Denis
    [J]. RUSI JOURNAL, 2019, 164 (5-6): : 130 - 135