Behavior of potato gametoclonal plants against the necrotic strain of potato Y potyvirus

被引:0
|
作者
G. Grammatikaki
A. Avgelis
A. Sonnino
机构
[1] Technological Education Institute,Department of Crop Science, School of Agricultural Technology
[2] National Agricultural Research Foundation,Plant Virus Laboratory
[3] Energy and the Environment,National Agency for New Technologies
来源
关键词
Solanum tuberosum; gametoclonal variation; anther culture; potato virus Y; resistance;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
A total of 59 Solanum tuberosum androgenetic plants have been obtained through anther culture, 47 of which derived from a tetraploid clone, seven from a diploid hybrid, and five from an anther-derived clone. About two thirds of the anther-derived plants were dihaploids, a few were monohaploids (5.08%) or aneuploids (6.78%), whereas the tetraploid genotype generated about a third of tetraploids. Seven hundred twenty seven R1 plants arisen from tubers of the androgenetic potatoes were mechanically inoculated with the necrotic strain of the potato Y potyvirus (PVYN) and grown in a glasshouse. Fifty days after inoculation, the presence of PVYN in R1 plants was detected by DAS-ELISA (Double Autibody Sandwich). Only three plants (0.4%) of genotype H2-258 exhibited local necrotic symptoms (hypersensitivity reaction) suggesting the presence of the Ny gene, and this extreme resistance is epistatic to hypersensitive resistance. The immunity (Ry-gene) to PVYN was retained through anther culturing and present at all levels of ploidy. The pattern of segregation for immunity was differentiated according to the ploidy level of the anther-derived plants. This changed segregation pattern may be due to a loss of resistance during the culturing, when an endoreduplication has taken place or to the possible regeneration from Second-division restituted unreduced microspores. Anyway, this segregation pattern must be taken into account when gametoclones are used in genetic studies.
引用
收藏
页码:507 / 512
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Behavior of potato gametoclonal plants against the necrotic strain of potato Y potyvirus
    Grammatikaki, G.
    Avgelis, A.
    Sonnino, A.
    [J]. RUSSIAN JOURNAL OF PLANT PHYSIOLOGY, 2007, 54 (04) : 507 - 512
  • [2] NECROTIC STRAIN OF POTATO VIRUS Y
    MUNRO, J
    [J]. AMERICAN POTATO JOURNAL, 1974, 51 (09): : 306 - 306
  • [3] Strain specific recombinant antibodies to potato virus Y potyvirus
    Boonham, N
    Barker, I
    [J]. JOURNAL OF VIROLOGICAL METHODS, 1998, 74 (02) : 193 - 199
  • [4] Evaluation of Commercial Potato Cultivars for Resistance to the Tuber Necrotic Strain of Potato Virus Y
    Cloete, M.
    Mabasa, K.
    Mulabisana, J.
    Visser, A.
    Rakuambo, J.
    Netshifhehe, S.
    [J]. II ALL AFRICA HORTICULTURE CONGRESS, 2013, 1007 : 255 - 260
  • [5] Potato tuber necrotic ringspot disease occurring in Japan:: Its association with Potato virus Y necrotic strain
    Ohshima, K
    Sako, K
    Hiraishi, C
    Nakagawa, A
    Matsuo, K
    Ogawa, T
    Shikata, E
    Sako, N
    [J]. PLANT DISEASE, 2000, 84 (10) : 1109 - 1115
  • [6] Potato disease caused by combined infection with potato spindle tuber viroid and potato virus Y necrotic strain
    S. A. Romanova
    Yu. G. Volkov
    N. N. Kakareka
    T. I. Pleshakova
    Z. N. Kozlovskaya
    [J]. Russian Agricultural Sciences, 2007, 33 (3) : 162 - 165
  • [7] Potato Y Potyvirus Detection by Immunological and Molecular Techniques in Plants and Aphids
    Christina Varveri
    [J]. Phytoparasitica, 2000, 28 : 141 - 148
  • [8] Potato Y potyvirus detection by immunological and molecular techniques in plants and aphids
    Varveri, C
    [J]. PHYTOPARASITICA, 2000, 28 (02) : 141 - 148
  • [9] Evaluation of some therapies and meristem culture to eliminate Potato Y potyvirus from infected potato plants
    AlMaarri, K.
    Massa, R.
    AlBiski, F.
    [J]. PLANT BIOTECHNOLOGY, 2012, 29 (03) : 237 - 243
  • [10] BIOCHEMICAL-CHANGES DURING THE NECROTIC SYSTEMIC INFECTION OF TOBACCO PLANTS BY POTATO VIRUS-Y, NECROTIC STRAIN
    ROGGERO, P
    PENNAZIO, S
    [J]. PHYSIOLOGICAL AND MOLECULAR PLANT PATHOLOGY, 1988, 32 (01) : 105 - 113