Assessment of the relevance of journals in research libraries using bibliometrics (a review)

被引:2
|
作者
Gureev V.N. [1 ]
Mazov N.A. [1 ]
机构
[1] Information and Library Center, Institute of Petroleum Geology and Geophysics, Siberian Branch, Russia Academy of Sciences, Novosibirsk
来源
关键词
acquisition; bibliometric analysis; citation analysis; content analysis; research libraries; scientific journals;
D O I
10.3103/S0147688215010050
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Originally, most bibliometric research is aimed at the improvement of library collection-management methods and at the development of new methods for the selection of documents for a collection. This is also true of the impact factor, which was designed to evaluate journals before their inclusion in the collections of research libraries. Thus, the core of bibliometrics is librarianship. However, in recent years bibliometric studies are mainly conducted for the evaluation of scientific developments and individual scientists. In this case, a significant part of such research is carried out by workers at research libraries. Paradoxically, these approaches are not used in librarianship itself. With the expansion of the range of available tools, the development and use of bibliometric methods for the analysis of scientific information in libraries, especially in the acquisition process, once again has become relevant, which is consistent with the changes in science and publishing themselves. This has been stated by both foreign and domestic experts. © 2015, Allerton Press, Inc.
引用
下载
收藏
页码:30 / 40
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Key Points of Discussion in Scientific Research Evaluation: Peer Review, Bibliometrics and Relevance
    Fernanda Sarthou, Nerina
    REVISTA DE ESTUDIOS SOCIALES, 2016, (58) : 76 - 86
  • [2] National research assessment exercises: a comparison of peer review and bibliometrics rankings
    Giovanni Abramo
    Ciriaco Andrea D’Angelo
    Flavia Di Costa
    Scientometrics, 2011, 89 : 929 - 941
  • [3] National research assessment exercises: a comparison of peer review and bibliometrics rankings
    Abramo, Giovanni
    D'Angelo, Ciriaco Andrea
    Di Costa, Flavia
    SCIENTOMETRICS, 2011, 89 (03) : 929 - 941
  • [4] The misuse of bibliometrics in research assessment infrastructures
    Quaderi N.
    Information Services and Use, 2023, 44 (01): : 23 - 26
  • [5] Bibliometrics Analysis of Research Literatures on Smart Library in Academic Journals of China
    Huang, Kunyuan
    Liu, Shi
    Zhou, Zhiqiang
    2018 3RD INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON INFORMATION SYSTEMS ENGINEERING (ICISE), 2018, : 67 - 72
  • [6] Research Assessment and Bibliometrics: Bringing Quality Back in
    Ochsner, Michael
    Hug, Sven E.
    PROCEEDINGS OF ISSI 2015 ISTANBUL: 15TH INTERNATIONAL SOCIETY OF SCIENTOMETRICS AND INFORMETRICS CONFERENCE, 2015, : 596 - 597
  • [7] On the agreement between bibliometrics and peer review: Evidence from the Italian research assessment exercises
    Baccini, Alberto
    Barabesi, Lucio
    De Nicolao, Giuseppe
    PLOS ONE, 2020, 15 (11):
  • [8] Bibliometrics Evaluation of Scientific Journals and Country Research Output of Dental Research in Latin America Using Scimago Journal and Country Rank
    Vaccaro, Gustavo
    Sanchez-Nunez, Pablo
    Witt-Rodriguez, Patricia
    PUBLICATIONS, 2022, 10 (03)
  • [9] Halal research streams: A systematic and bibliometrics review
    Putera, Prakoso Bhairawa
    Rakhel, Tiurma Melissa
    COGENT SOCIAL SCIENCES, 2023, 9 (01):
  • [10] ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE IN TOURISM: A REVIEW AND BIBLIOMETRICS RESEARCH
    Kirtil, Ismail Gokay
    Askun, Volkan
    ADVANCES IN HOSPITALITY AND TOURISM RESEARCH-AHTR, 2021, 9 (01): : 205 - 233