Air Quality Improvement Estimation and Assessment Using Contingent Valuation Method, A Case Study in Beijing

被引:0
|
作者
X. J. Wang
W. Zhang
Y. Li
K. Z. Yang
M. Bai
机构
[1] Peking University,College of Environmental Sciences, MOE Laboratory of Earth Surface Process
来源
关键词
air quality; contingent valuation method; environmental valuation; willingness to pay;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
The aim of the paper is to estimate and assess residents' willingness to pay to improve air quality in the urban area of Beijing using the Contingent Valuation Method (CVM). The mean willingness to pay (WTP) for a 50% reduction of harmful substances in the air was 143 CNY per household per year, and the total WTP of the residents in the study area was 336 million CNY per year. As a proportion of household annual income, the mean WTP amounted to 0.7%. Four socio-economic variables were found to have significant impacts on residents' willingness to pay. The analysis results illustrated that WTP increases with income and education level, and decreases with household population and age. The willingness was larger for residents in the urban districts than those in the suburban districts. It was found that most of the protest bids lay on interviewees' incomplete perception of the values of environmental amenity. The influence of household income on people's willingness to pay illustrated in this study reflects a causal force of Beijing's transition to market economy that households created to have disposable income are more likely to care about environmental quality. The results of this study strike an optimistic note on the possibility of measuring the total economic value of environmental quality improvement by using the CVM in China. Suggestions on implication of the CVM for both academics and policy makers are provided in the paper.
引用
收藏
页码:153 / 168
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Air quality improvement estimation and assessment using contingent valuation method, a case study in Beijing
    Wang, X. J.
    Zhang, W.
    Li, Y.
    Yang, K. Z.
    Bai, M.
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING AND ASSESSMENT, 2006, 120 (1-3) : 153 - 168
  • [2] Air quality assessment by contingent valuation in Ji'nan, China
    Wang, Yan
    Zhang, Yi-Sheng
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2009, 90 (02) : 1022 - 1029
  • [3] The Contingent Valuation Method for the economic assessment of Groundwater: A Lebanese case study
    El Chami, Daniel
    El Moujabber, Maroun
    Scardigno, Alessandra
    [J]. NEW MEDIT, 2008, 7 (03): : 19 - 24
  • [4] Valuation of in-stream water quality improvement via fuzzy contingent valuation method
    Ho-Wen Chen
    Ni-Bin Chang
    Daigee Shaw
    [J]. Stochastic Environmental Research and Risk Assessment, 2005, 19 : 158 - 171
  • [5] Valuation of in-stream water quality improvement via fuzzy contingent valuation method
    Chen, HW
    Chang, NB
    Shaw, D
    [J]. STOCHASTIC ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND RISK ASSESSMENT, 2005, 19 (02) : 158 - 171
  • [6] Valuing Agricultural Landscape: Lithuanian Case Study Using a Contingent Valuation Method
    Novikova, Anastasija
    Rocchi, Lucia
    Vaznonis, Bernardas
    [J]. SUSTAINABILITY, 2019, 11 (09)
  • [7] Measuring the benefits of air quality improvement in Taipei: A comparison of contingent valuation elicitation techniques
    Lu, AY
    Bishop, RC
    Welsh, MP
    [J]. ECONOMICS OF POLLUTION CONTROL IN THE ASIA PACIFIC, 1996, : 182 - 198
  • [8] Valuation of ecotourism resources using a contingent valuation method: The case of the Korean DMZ
    Lee, Choong-Ki
    Mjelde, James W.
    [J]. ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS, 2007, 63 (2-3) : 511 - 520
  • [9] Benefit estimation for different types of bikeways using contingent valuation method
    Lee, Jang-Ho
    Han, Sangyong
    Shin, Hee Cheol
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SUSTAINABLE TRANSPORTATION, 2021, 15 (03) : 175 - 186
  • [10] The contingent valuation method - Case study on a system of recreation areas
    Dumitras, Diana E.
    Rollins, Kimberly
    Balazs, Simona
    [J]. Bulletin of the University of Agricultural Science and Veterinary Medicine, Vol 62, 2005: HORTICULTURE, 2005, 62 : 190 - 195