Constraints on herbivory by grizzly bears

被引:0
|
作者
Karyn D. Rode
Charles T. Robbins
Lisa A. Shipley
机构
[1] Washington State University,Department of Zoology
[2] Washington State University,Department of Natural Resource Sciences
[3] University of Florida,Department of Zoology
来源
Oecologia | 2001年 / 128卷
关键词
Dietary protein; Foraging; Grizzly bears; Herbivory; Intake rate;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Although well known as carnivores and not capable of digesting plant fiber, grizzly bears (Ursus arctos horribilis) consume over 200 species of plants and are entirely vegetarian in some ecosystems. Even in ecosystems with abundant meat resources, green vegetation can be an important seasonal food resource. Therefore, we examined the morphological, physiological, and environmental constraints that determine the nutritional value of herbaceous vegetation to grizzly bears. Short-term, board foraging trials were used with captive grizzly bears to determine constraints on intake rate including bite size, bite rate, bear size, plant species, plant height, and plant distribution. Feeding trials were conducted to determine the effect of protein level (12–35%) and digestible dry matter intake on weight gain. Finally, maximum daily intake, daily foraging time, and weight change were measured for captive bears foraging on highly abundant and nutritious forbs and grasses during 12-day trials. Intake during short-term board trials overestimated the intake of freely foraging bears from two- to seven-fold depending on bear size. Because of their relatively larger bite sizes, smaller absolute energy requirements, and relatively larger intake capacity, smaller bears (<120 kg) made greater weight gains than very large bears on herbaceous vegetation. Smaller bears with ad libitum access to palatable, nutritious forbs gained weight at rates equal to wild bears. However, depending upon plant characteristics, bite sizes and available daily foraging time increasingly prevented large bears (>120 kg) from gaining weight on herbaceous vegetation. Both captive and wild bears select forbs over grasses at similar growth stages because forbs are generally higher in protein and more digestible than grasses. Therefore, the nutritional well-being of wild grizzly bears could be improved in areas where bears are largely herbivorous and, thus, relatively small by purposefully managing for nutritious forbs.
引用
收藏
页码:62 / 71
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Constraints on herbivory by grizzly bears
    Rode, KD
    Robbins, CT
    Shipley, LA
    OECOLOGIA, 2001, 128 (01) : 62 - 71
  • [2] GRIZZLY BEARS
    KINASZ, H
    SMITHSONIAN, 1993, 23 (10) : 15 - 15
  • [3] Thermal constraints on energy balance, behaviour and spatial distribution of grizzly bears
    Rogers, Savannah A.
    Robbins, Charles T.
    Mathewson, Paul D.
    Carnahan, Anthony M.
    van Manen, Frank T.
    Haroldson, Mark A.
    Porter, Warren P.
    Rogers, Taylor R.
    Soule, Terence
    Long, Ryan A.
    FUNCTIONAL ECOLOGY, 2021, 35 (02) : 398 - 410
  • [4] TRACKING GRIZZLY BEARS
    CRAIGHEA.FC
    CRAIGHEA.JJ
    BIOSCIENCE, 1965, 15 (02) : 88 - &
  • [5] Grizzly bears and forestry - I: Road vegetation and placement as an attractant to grizzly bears
    Roever, C. L.
    Boyce, M. S.
    Stenhouse, G. B.
    FOREST ECOLOGY AND MANAGEMENT, 2008, 256 (06) : 1253 - 1261
  • [6] Constraints on active-consumption rates in gray wolves, coyotes, and grizzly bears
    Wilmers, CC
    Stahler, DR
    CANADIAN JOURNAL OF ZOOLOGY, 2002, 80 (07) : 1256 - 1261
  • [7] Myrmecophagy by Yellowstone grizzly bears
    Mattson, DJ
    CANADIAN JOURNAL OF ZOOLOGY, 2001, 79 (05) : 779 - 793
  • [8] SEXUAL BEHAVIOR OF GRIZZLY BEARS
    SPARROWE, RD
    AMERICAN MIDLAND NATURALIST, 1968, 80 (02): : 570 - &
  • [9] YET MORE ON GRIZZLY BEARS
    MUELLER, HC
    BIOSCIENCE, 1971, 21 (22) : 1109 - &
  • [10] Natal dispersal of grizzly bears
    McLellan, B.N.
    Hovey, F.W.
    Canadian Journal of Zoology, 2001, 79 (05) : 838 - 844