Investigation of Ionospheric Electron Density Change During Two Partial Solar Eclipses and Its Comparison with Predictions of NeQuick 2 and IRI-2016 Models

被引:0
|
作者
Ramazan Atıcı
Selçuk Sağır
Leonid Ya Emelyanov
Mykhaylo Lyashenko
机构
[1] Mus Alparslan University,
[2] Institute of Ionosphere,undefined
来源
关键词
Ionospheric electron density; Solar eclipse; Incoherent scatter radar; NeQuick 2 model; IRI-2016 model;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
In the present study, the results obtained by incoherent scatter radar (ISR) and empirical models (NeQuick2 and IRI-2016) of the variations in mid-latitude ionospheric electron density during partial solar eclipses on March 29, 2006 and March 20, 2015 over Kharkiv (49.60° N, 36.30° E, Ukraine) are presented and the prediction performances of the models during these partial solar eclipses are compared. The electron density (Ne) values are obtained for seven (190, 210, 240, 290, 340, 410, and 490 km) different altitudes. The percent deviation of Ne values, statistical correlation coefficient and root mean square error (RMSE) during solar eclipses are applied to make this investigation. According to the percent deviation of Ne values measured by ISR, a decrease in electron density was observed at all heights during the eclipse of March 29, 2006, whereas there was a decrease in Ne values at only 190, 210, and 240 km altitudes during the eclipse of March 20, 2015. However, at other altitudes (290, 340, 410, and 490 km), the increase has occurred in the electron density during the eclipse on March 20, 2015. The IRI-2016 model predicted that Ne values increase at all altitudes in the solar eclipse on March 20, 2015, and a decrease in Ne at all altitudes occurs on March 29, 2006. It can be said that the NeQuick 2 model predicts a decrease in the first three heights and an increase in other heights. When the predictions of the empirical models were compared, according to the root mean square error (RMSE) calculations, the predictions of the IRI-2016 model can be said to be better than that of NeQuick 2 at all heights during eclipse of March 29, 2006. Besides, the IRI-2016 model's prediction can be stated to be better than NeQuick 2 model at the first three altitudes (190, 210 and 240 km), while the NeQuick 2 model's prediction can be said to be better than the IRI-2016 model at the last four (290, 340, 410, and 490 km) altitudes during March 20, 2015 eclipse. It can be stated that ionospheric models do not accurately reflect the ionospheric response to partial solar eclipses. The inclusion of ISR data in empirical models will help models accurately predict the ionospheric response under all conditions.
引用
收藏
页码:2239 / 2251
页数:12
相关论文
共 34 条
  • [1] Investigation of Ionospheric Electron Density Change During Two Partial Solar Eclipses and Its Comparison with Predictions of NeQuick 2 and IRI-2016 Models
    Atici, Ramazan
    Sagir, Selcuk
    Emelyanov, Leonid Ya
    Lyashenko, Mykhaylo
    WIRELESS PERSONAL COMMUNICATIONS, 2021, 118 (04) : 2239 - 2251
  • [2] Klobuchar, NeQuickG, BDGIM, GLONASS, IRI-2016, IRI-2012, IRI-Plas, NeQuick2, and GEMTEC Ionospheric Models: A Comparison in Total Electron Content and Positioning Domains
    Yasyukevich, Yury V. V.
    Zatolokin, Dmitry
    Padokhin, Artem
    Wang, Ningbo
    Nava, Bruno
    Li, Zishen
    Yuan, Yunbin
    Yasyukevich, Anna
    Chen, Chuanfu
    Vesnin, Artem
    SENSORS, 2023, 23 (10)
  • [3] Effects of local time on the variations of the total electron contents at an American and Asian longitudes and their comparison with IRI-2016, IRI-Plas2017 and NeQuick-2 models during solar cycle 24
    Kayode, Yusuf Olanrewaju
    Okoh, Daniel
    Onori, Eugene Oghenakpobor
    Ometan, Oluwafunmilayo Oluwayemisi
    Adegbola, Rafiu Bolaji
    Ogwala, Aghogho
    Somoye, Emmanuel Olufemi
    Adeniji-Adele, Rasaq Adewemimo
    JOURNAL OF ATMOSPHERIC AND SOLAR-TERRESTRIAL PHYSICS, 2024, 260
  • [4] Assessment and Validation of Three Ionospheric Models (IRI-2016, NeQuick2, and IGS-GIM) From 2002 to 2018
    Chen, Jun
    Ren, Xiaodong
    Zhang, Xiaohong
    Zhang, Jincheng
    Huang, Liangke
    SPACE WEATHER-THE INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RESEARCH AND APPLICATIONS, 2020, 18 (06):
  • [5] Ionospheric Behavior of foF2 over Chinese EIA Region and Its Comparison with IRI-2016
    Zhu, Peng
    Xie, Cong
    Jiang, Chunhua
    Yang, Guobin
    Liu, Jing
    Li, Zhengqiang
    Zhao, Zhengyu
    UNIVERSE, 2020, 6 (08)
  • [6] A Comparison of IRI-2016 foF2 Predictions with the Observations at Different Latitudes During Geomagnetic Storms
    Timocin, E.
    Unal, I.
    Goker, U. D.
    GEOMAGNETISM AND AERONOMY, 2018, 58 (07) : 846 - 856
  • [7] A Comparison of IRI-2016 foF2 Predictions with the Observations at Different Latitudes During Geomagnetic Storms
    E. Timoçin
    İ. Ünal
    Ü. D. Göker
    Geomagnetism and Aeronomy, 2018, 58 : 846 - 856
  • [8] Comparison of ionospheric anomalies over African equatorial/low-latitude region with IRI-2016 model predictions during the maximum phase of solar cycle 24
    Amaechi, Paul O.
    Oyeyemi, Elijah O.
    Akala, Andrew O.
    Kaab, Mohamed
    Younas, Waqar
    Benkhaldoun, Zouhair
    Khan, Majid
    Mazaudier, Christine-Amory
    ADVANCES IN SPACE RESEARCH, 2021, 68 (03) : 1473 - 1484
  • [9] Comparison of the Ionospheric F2 Region Critical Frequency between Ionosonde Measurements and IRI-2016 Predictions over Sanya
    Wang, Hui
    Zou, Yuhua
    2018 12TH INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON ANTENNAS, PROPAGATION AND ELECTROMAGNETIC THEORY (ISAPE), 2018,
  • [10] Comparison between IRI-2012, IRI-2016 models and F2 peak parameters in two stations of the EIA in Vietnam during different solar activity periods
    Thu, Hong Pham Thi
    Mazaudier, Christine Amory
    Le Huy, Minh
    Thanh, Dung Nguyen
    Viet, Hung Luu
    Thi, Ngoc Luong
    Hozumi, Kornyanat
    Le Truong, Thanh
    ADVANCES IN SPACE RESEARCH, 2021, 68 (05) : 2076 - 2092