Current status of MRI diagnostics with liver-specific contrast agents. Gd-EOB-DTPA and Gd-BOPTA [Aktueller stand der MRT-diagnostik mit leberspezifischen kontrastmitteln: Gd-EOB-DTPA und Gd-BOPTA]

被引：0

作者：

Stroszczynski C. ^{[1
,2
]}

Gaffke G. ^{[1
]}

Gnauck M. ^{[1
]}

Streitparth F. ^{[1
]}

Wieners G. ^{[1
]}

Lopez-Häninnen E. ^{[1
]}

机构：

[1] Klin. Poliklin. F. Strahlenheilkunde, Campus-Virchow-Klinikum, Char.-Universitatsmedizin Berlin

[2] Klin. Poliklin. F. Strahlenheilkunde, Campus-Virchow-Klinikum, Char.-Universitätsmedizin, 13353 Berlin

来源：

Der Radiologe | 2004年 / 44卷 / 12期

关键词：

Gd-BOPTA; Gd-EOB-DTPA; Liver-specific contrast agents; MRI diagnostics;

D O I：

10.1007/s00117-004-1134-5

中图分类号：

学科分类号：

摘要：

The contrast agents Gd-EOB-DTPA and Gd-BOPTA can be administered by bolus injection and are appropriate for use in MRI both as vascularization markers and markers of hepatobiliary excretion. This contribution presents an overview of the specific characteristics of contrast media and the status of clinical development. In comparison to CT and to MRI with unspecific extracellular Gd-chelates, liver-specific contrast agents offer advantages in differentiating unclear liver lesions, increasing the detection rate, and examining the bile duct system.

引用

页码：1185 / 1191

页数：6

共 45 条

[1] Current status of MRI diagnostics with liver-specific contrast agents.: Gd-EOB-DTPA and Gd-BOPTA
Stroszczynski, C
Gaffke, G
Gnauck, M
Streitparth, F
Wieners, G
Lopez-Häninnen, E
RADIOLOGE, 2004, 44 (12): : 1185 - 1191
[2] Liver Vessel Enhancement by Gd-BOPTA and Gd-EOB-DTPA: A Comparison in Healthy Volunteers
Brismar, T. B.
Dahlstrom, N.
Edsborg, N.
Persson, A.
Smedby, O.
Albiin, N.
ACTA RADIOLOGICA, 2009, 50 (07) : 709 - 715
[3] Quantifying differences in hepatic uptake of the liver specific contrast agents Gd-EOB-DTPA and Gd-BOPTA: a pilot study
O. Dahlqvist Leinhard
N. Dahlström
J. Kihlberg
P. Sandström
T. B. Brismar
Ö. Smedby
P. Lundberg
European Radiology, 2012, 22 : 642 - 653
[4] A comparison of two MR hepatobiliary gadolinium chelates: Gd-BOPTA and Gd-EOB-DTPA
Runge, VM
JOURNAL OF COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY, 1998, 22 (04) : 643 - 650
[5] Quantifying differences in hepatic uptake of the liver specific contrast agents Gd-EOB-DTPA and Gd-BOPTA: a pilot study
Leinhard, O. Dahlqvist
Dahlstrom, N.
Kihlberg, J.
Sandstrom, P.
Brismar, T. B.
Smedby, O.
Lundberg, P.
EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2012, 22 (03) : 642 - 653
[6] Contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance cholangiography with Gd-BOPTA and Gd-EOB-DTPA in healthy subjects
Dahlstrom, N.
Persson, A.
Albiin, N.
Smedby, O.
Brismar, T. B.
ACTA RADIOLOGICA, 2007, 48 (04) : 362 - 368
[7] Lesion detection and assessment of extrahepatic findings in abdominal MRI using hepatocyte specific contrast agents - comparison of Gd-EOB-DTPA and Gd-BOPTA
Ringe, Kristina I.
Boll, Daniel T.
Husarik, Daniela B.
Bashir, Mustafa R.
Gupta, Rajan T.
Merkle, Elmar M.
BMC MEDICAL IMAGING, 2013, 13
[8] Comparison of Gd-Bz-TTDA, Gd-EOB-DTPA, and Gd-BOPTA for dynamic MR imaging of the liver in rat models
Jaw, Twei-Shiun
Chen, Shih-Hsien
Wang, Yun-Ming
Hsu, Jui-Sheng
Kuo, Yu-Ting
Chiu, Yen-Yu
Tsai, Kun-Bow
Hsieh, Tsyh-Jyi
Liu, Gin-Chung
KAOHSIUNG JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCES, 2012, 28 (03): : 130 - 137
[9] Lesion detection and assessment of extrahepatic findings in abdominal MRI using hepatocyte specific contrast agents – comparison of Gd-EOB-DTPA and Gd-BOPTA
Kristina I Ringe
Daniel T Boll
Daniela B Husarik
Mustafa R Bashir
Rajan T Gupta
Elmar M Merkle
BMC Medical Imaging, 13
[10] Response to Letter: Intrapatient Comparison of the Hepatobiliary Phase of Gd-BOPTA and Gd-EOB-DTPA in the Differentiation of HCA From FNH
Thomeer, Maarten G.
Vanhooymissen, Inge J. S. M. L.
Braun, Loes M. M.
van Koeverden, Sebastiaan
Willemssen, Francois E.
De Man, Robert A.
Ijzermans, Jan N.
Dwarkasing, Roy S.
JOURNAL OF MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING, 2020, 52 (04) : 1281 - 1282

← 1 2 3 4 5 →