A multi-objective robust optimization approach based on Gaussian process model

被引:0
|
作者
Qi Zhou
Ping Jiang
Xiang Huang
Feng Zhang
Taotao Zhou
机构
[1] Huazhong University of Science & Technology,The State Key Laboratory of Digital Manufacturing Equipment and Technology, School of Mechanical Science and Engineering
[2] Georgia Institute of Technology,George W. Woodruff School of Mechanical Engineering
[3] China Ship Development and Design Center,undefined
关键词
Robust optimization; Multi-objective optimization; Interval uncertainty; Interpolation uncertainty; GP model;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
The design and optimization of engineering products is usually multi-objective, constrained and has uncertainties in the inputs. It is of great importance for taking these uncertainties into consideration during the design process because these uncertainties can significantly degrade the performance of optimal solutions and even change the feasibility of obtained solutions. Most existing Multi-objective robust optimization (MORO) approaches rely on outer-inner nested optimization structures, where a large number of function evaluations is required. In this work, a MORO approach based on Gaussian process (GP) model is proposed to ease the computational burden of MORO under interval uncertainty. To consider the interpolation uncertainty introduced by GP model, an objective switching criterion is developed, which is according to whether the robust status of the individual can be changed because of the interpolation uncertainties from GP model or not. Six numerical and engineering cases with different degrees of difficulty are used to demonstrate the applicability and efficiency of the proposed approach. The objective and feasibility robustness of the obtained optimal solutions are verified via the design of experiment.
引用
收藏
页码:213 / 233
页数:20
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] A multi-objective robust optimization approach based on Gaussian process model
    Zhou, Qi
    Jiang, Ping
    Huang, Xiang
    Zhang, Feng
    Zhou, Taotao
    [J]. STRUCTURAL AND MULTIDISCIPLINARY OPTIMIZATION, 2018, 57 (01) : 213 - 233
  • [2] A New Approach to Building the Gaussian Process Model for Expensive Multi-objective Optimization
    Luo, Jianping
    Feng, Jiqiang
    Jin, RuoFan
    [J]. 2019 9TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON INFORMATION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY (ICIST2019), 2019, : 374 - 379
  • [3] Robust optimization: A kriging-based multi-objective optimization approach
    Ribaud, Melina
    Blanchet-Scalliet, Christophette
    Helbert, Celine
    Gillot, Frederic
    [J]. RELIABILITY ENGINEERING & SYSTEM SAFETY, 2020, 200
  • [4] Deep Gaussian process for multi-objective Bayesian optimization
    Ali Hebbal
    Mathieu Balesdent
    Loïc Brevault
    Nouredine Melab
    El-Ghazali Talbi
    [J]. Optimization and Engineering, 2023, 24 : 1809 - 1848
  • [5] Deep Gaussian process for multi-objective Bayesian optimization
    Hebbal, Ali
    Balesdent, Mathieu
    Brevault, Loic
    Melab, Nouredine
    Talbi, El-Ghazali
    [J]. OPTIMIZATION AND ENGINEERING, 2023, 24 (03) : 1809 - 1848
  • [6] A MODEL-BASED APPROACH TO MULTI-OBJECTIVE OPTIMIZATION
    Hale, Joshua Q.
    Zhou, Enlu
    [J]. 2015 WINTER SIMULATION CONFERENCE (WSC), 2015, : 3599 - 3609
  • [7] Multi-objective optimization for sensor placement: An integrated combinatorial approach with reduced order model and Gaussian process
    Xu, Zhaoyi
    Guo, Yanjie
    Saleh, Joseph Homer
    [J]. MEASUREMENT, 2022, 187
  • [8] Noisy multi-objective optimization algorithm based on Gaussian model and regularity model
    Liu, Ruochen
    Li, Nanxi
    Wang, Fangfang
    [J]. SWARM AND EVOLUTIONARY COMPUTATION, 2022, 69
  • [9] Multi-objective approach for robust design optimization problems
    Egorov, Igor N.
    Kretinin, Gennadiy V.
    Leshchenko, Igor A.
    Kuptzov, Sergey V.
    [J]. INVERSE PROBLEMS IN SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING, 2007, 15 (01) : 47 - 59
  • [10] Yield Optimization using Hybrid Gaussian Process Regression and a Genetic Multi-Objective Approach
    Fuhrlaender, Mona
    Schoeps, Sebastian
    [J]. ADVANCES IN RADIO SCIENCE, 2021, 19 : 41 - 48