From GUM to alternative methods for measurement uncertainty evaluation

被引:0
|
作者
Marc Priel
机构
[1] Laboratoire National de Métrologie et d’Essais,
来源
关键词
Measurement uncertainty; Proficiency testing; Internal quality control; External Quality Assessment Scheme (EQAS); Uncertainty in biological analysis;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Since the advent of the Guide to the expression of Uncertainty in Measurement (GUM) in 1995 laying the principles of uncertainty evaluation numerous projects have been carried out to develop alternative practical methods that are easier to implement namely when it is impossible to model the measurement process for technical or economical aspects. In this paper, the author presents the recent evolution of measurement uncertainty evaluation methods. The evaluation of measurement uncertainty can be presented according to two axes based on intralaboratory and interlaboratory approaches. The intralaboratory approach includes “the modelling approach” (application of the procedure described in section 8 of the GUM, known as GUM uncertainty framework) and “the single laboratory validation approach”. The interlaboratory approaches are based on collaborative studies and they are respectively named “interlaboratory validation approach” and “proficiency testing approach”.
引用
收藏
页码:235 / 241
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] From GUM to alternative methods for measurement uncertainty evaluation
    Priel, Marc
    ACCREDITATION AND QUALITY ASSURANCE, 2009, 14 (05) : 235 - 241
  • [2] FROM GUM TO ALTERNATIVE METHODS FOR MEASUREMENT UNCERTAINTY EVALUATION
    Priel, Marc
    ADVANCED MATHEMATICAL AND COMPUTATIONAL TOOLS IN METROLOGY AND TESTING VIII, 2009, 78 : 262 - 272
  • [3] Adaptive Monte Carlo and GUM methods for the evaluation of measurement uncertainty of cylindricity error
    Wen, Xiu-lan
    Zhao, Yi-bing
    Wang, Dong-xia
    Pan, Jun
    PRECISION ENGINEERING-JOURNAL OF THE INTERNATIONAL SOCIETIES FOR PRECISION ENGINEERING AND NANOTECHNOLOGY, 2013, 37 (04): : 856 - 864
  • [4] Guidance on Bayesian uncertainty evaluation for a class of GUM measurement models
    Demeyer, S.
    Fischer, N.
    Elster, C.
    METROLOGIA, 2021, 58 (01)
  • [5] Advanced Methods for Measurement Uncertainty Evaluation
    Zakharov, Igor
    Botsiura, Olesia
    2022 XXXII INTERNATIONAL SCIENTIFIC SYMPOSIUM METROLOGY AND METROLOGY ASSURANCE (MMA), 2022, : 19 - 22
  • [6] Alternative methods for uncertainty evaluation in EUV scatterometry
    Heidenreich, Sebastian
    Henn, Mark-Alexander
    Gross, Hermann
    Bodermann, Bernd
    Baer, Markus
    MODELING ASPECTS IN OPTICAL METROLOGY IV, 2013, 8789
  • [7] The Concept of Measurement Uncertainty and the GUM
    Lee, Jong Wha
    JOURNAL OF THE KOREAN CHEMICAL SOCIETY-DAEHAN HWAHAK HOE JEE, 2023, 67 (05): : 319 - 332
  • [8] Measurement, uncertainty, traceability, and the GUM
    Ridler, Nick
    Lee, Brian
    Martens, Jon
    Wong, Ken
    IEEE MICROWAVE MAGAZINE, 2007, 8 (04) : 44 - 53
  • [9] Comparison of GUM and Monte Carlo methods for evaluating measurement uncertainty of perspiration measurement systems
    Chen, Andrew
    Chen, Chiachung
    MEASUREMENT, 2016, 87 : 27 - 37
  • [10] Comparison of ISO-GUM and Monte Carlo methods for the evaluation of measurement uncertainty: Application to direct cadmium measurement in water by GFAAS
    Theodorou, Dimitrios
    Meligotsidou, Loukia
    Karavoltsos, Sotirios
    Burnetas, Apostolos
    Dassenakis, Manos
    Scoullos, Michael
    TALANTA, 2011, 83 (05) : 1568 - 1574