Quantifying patch distribution at multiple spatial scales: Applications to wildlife-habitat models

被引:0
|
作者
Johnson C.J. [1 ,3 ]
Boyce M.S. [1 ]
Mulders R. [2 ]
Gunn A. [2 ]
Gau R.J. [2 ]
Dean Cluff H. [2 ]
Case R.L. [2 ]
机构
[1] Department of Biological Sciences, Z 907 Biological Sciences Building, University of Alberta, Edmonton
[2] Government of Northwest Territories, Dept. Rsrc., Wildl. Economic Devmt., Yellowknife, Northwest Territ.
[3] Ecosystem Sci. and Mgmt. Program, Univ. of Northern British Columbia, Prince George, BC V2N 4Z9
关键词
Canadian Arctic; Habitat; Hierarchy; Landscape pattern; Local quadrat variance; Resource selection; Scale;
D O I
10.1007/s10980-005-0246-2
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Multiscale analyses are widely employed for wildlife-habitat studies. In most cases, however, each scale is considered discrete and little emphasis is placed on incorporating or measuring the responses of wildlife to resources across multiple scales. We modeled the responses of three Arctic wildlife species to vegetative resources distributed at two spatial scales: patches and collections of patches aggregated across a regional area. We defined a patch as a single or homogeneous collection of pixels representing 1 of 10 unique vegetation types. We employed a spatial pattern technique, three-term local quadrat variance, to quantify the distribution of patches at a larger regional scale. We used the distance at which the variance for each of 10 vegetation types peaked to define a moving window for calculating the density of patches. When measures of vegetation patch and density were applied to resource selection functions, the most parsimonious models for wolves and grizzly bears included covariates recorded at both scales. Seasonal resource selection by caribou was best described using a model consisting of only regional scale covariates. Our results suggest that for some species and environments simple patch-scale models may not capture the full range of spatial variation in resources to which wildlife may respond. For mobile animals that range across heterogeneous areas we recommend selection models that integrate resources occurring at a number of spatial scales. Patch density is a simple technique for representing such higher-order spatial patterns. © 2004 Kluwer Academic Publishers.
引用
收藏
页码:869 / 882
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Quantifying patch distribution at multiple spatial scales: applications to wildlife-habitat models
    Johnson, CJ
    Boyce, MS
    Mulders, R
    Gunn, A
    Gau, RJ
    Cluff, HD
    Case, RL
    LANDSCAPE ECOLOGY, 2004, 19 (08) : 869 - 882
  • [2] Quantifying patch distribution at multiple spatial scales: applications to wildlife-habitat models
    Chris J. Johnson
    Mark S. Boyce
    Robert Mulders
    Anne Gunn
    Rob J. Gau
    H. Dean Cluff
    Ray L. Case
    Landscape Ecology, 2004, 19 : 869 - 882
  • [3] Building better wildlife-habitat models
    Beutel, TS
    Beeton, RJS
    Baxter, GS
    ECOGRAPHY, 1999, 22 (02) : 219 - 223
  • [4] Mismatched spatial scales can limit the utility of citizen science data for estimating wildlife-habitat relationships
    Bauder, Javan M.
    Cervantes, Alyson M.
    Avrin, Alexandra C.
    Whipple, Laura S.
    Farmer, Morgan J.
    Miller, Craig A.
    Benson, Thomas J.
    Stodola, Kirk W.
    Allen, Maximilian L.
    ECOLOGICAL RESEARCH, 2021, 36 (01) : 87 - 96
  • [5] Quantifying instream habitat in the upper shavers fork basin at multiple spatial scales
    Petty, JT
    Freund, J
    Lamothe, P
    Mazik, P
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE FIFTY-FIFTH ANNUAL CONFERENCE OF THE SOUTHEASTERN ASSOCIATION OF FISH AND WILDLIFE AGENCIES, 2001, : 81 - 94
  • [6] Accuracy of gap analysis habitat models in predicting physical features for wildlife-habitat associations in the southwest U S
    Boykin, Kenneth G.
    Thompson, Bruce C.
    Propeck-Gray, Suzanne
    ECOLOGICAL MODELLING, 2010, 221 (23) : 2769 - 2775
  • [7] Absent or undetected? Effects of non-detection of species occurrence on wildlife-habitat models
    Gu, WD
    Swihart, RK
    BIOLOGICAL CONSERVATION, 2004, 116 (02) : 195 - 203
  • [8] Applications of Integrating Wildlife Habitat Suitability and Habitat Potential Models
    Williamson, Chad R.
    Campa, Henry, III
    Locher, Alexandra B.
    Winterstein, Scott R.
    Beyer, Dean E., Jr.
    WILDLIFE SOCIETY BULLETIN, 2021, 45 (01): : 70 - 84
  • [9] Wildlife habitat relationship models: Distribution and abundance
    Jennings, MD
    Csuti, B
    Scott, JM
    CONSERVATION BIOLOGY, 1997, 11 (06) : 1271 - 1272
  • [10] Relevance of multiple spatial scales in habitat models: A case study with amphibians and grasshoppers
    Altmoos, Michael
    Henle, Klaus
    ACTA OECOLOGICA-INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ECOLOGY, 2010, 36 (06): : 548 - 560