Winter severity or supplementary feeding—which matters more for wild boar?

During recent decades, wild boar have successfully colonised areas previously believed to be unsuitable for the species. Estonia lies close to the northern limit of the species range, and mast foods, which are a common natural food source for many wild boar populations, are practically absent. We hypothesised that the proportion of cultivated area and especially supplementary feeding, which is widely used in Estonia to lower the winter mortality of game species, play important roles in sustaining the local wild boar population. To determine the most important factors shaping the abundance of wild boar in a northern environment, we developed mixed models to account for variation in an index of wild boar abundance (AI) based on winter track counts. The abundance of supplementary feeding sites and mean January temperature were the most important factors determining wild boar winter abundance. We conclude that the current high local population density is sustained by intensive supplementary feeding, which has exceeded the limiting effect of harsh winters.