Water spray cooling during handling of feedlot cattle

被引:0
|
作者
Tami M. Brown-Brandl
Roger A. Eigenberg
John A. Nienaber
机构
[1] USDA,US Meat Animal Research Center
[2] ARS,undefined
关键词
Animal behavior; Body temperature; Cattle; Heat stress; Spray cooling; Sprinkle cooling;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Activities involved in receiving or working (e.g., sorting, dehorning, castration, weighing, implanting, etc.) of feedlot cattle cause an increase in body temperature. During hot weather the increased body temperature may disrupt normal behaviors including eating, which can be especially detrimental to the well-being and performance of the animals. Sprinkle cooling of animals has been successfully employed within the pen; however, added moisture to the pens’ surface increases odor generation from the pen. A study was conducted to investigate the effectiveness of a single instance of wetting an animal within the working facility instead of in the pen, which could potentially provide extra evaporative cooling to offset the added heat produced by activity. Sixty-four cross-bred heifers were assigned to one of eight pens on the basis of weight. On four separate occasions during hot conditions (average temperature 28.2 ± 1.9°C, 29.1 ± 2.0°C, 28.9 ± 3.0°C, and 26.8 ± 1.6°C; with the temperature ranging from 22.6 to 32.5°C during the trials), the heifers were moved from their pens to and from the working facility (a building with a scale and squeeze chute located 160–200 m away). While in the squeeze chute, four of the pens of heifers were sprinkle cooled and the remaining four pens were worked as normal. The heifers that were treated had a body temperature that peaked sooner (31.9 ± 0.63 min compared to 37.6 ± 0.62) with a lower peak body temperature (39.55 ± 0.03°C compared to 39.74 ± 0.03°C), and recovered sooner (70.5 ± 2.4 min compared to 83.2 ± 2.4 min). The treated animals also had a lower panting score, a visual assessment of level of cattle heat stress (1.1 ± 0.2 compared to 1.16 ± 0.2). The behavior measurements that were taken did not indicate a change in behavior. It was concluded that while a single instance of wetting an animal within the working facility did not completely offset the increase in body temperature, it was beneficial to the animals without needing to add water to the pen surface, thus reducing the potential for odor generation.
引用
收藏
页码:609 / 616
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Water spray cooling during handling of feedlot cattle
    Brown-Brandl, Tami M.
    Eigenberg, Roger A.
    Nienaber, John A.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF BIOMETEOROLOGY, 2010, 54 (06) : 609 - 616
  • [2] HANDLING AND DISPOSAL OF CATTLE FEEDLOT WASTE
    ALBIN, RC
    JOURNAL OF ANIMAL SCIENCE, 1971, 32 (04) : 803 - &
  • [3] INFILTRATION OF WATER ON A CATTLE FEEDLOT
    MIELKE, LN
    MAZURAK, AP
    TRANSACTIONS OF THE ASAE, 1976, 19 (02): : 341 - 344
  • [4] Welfare assessments of low stress handling in finishing feedlot cattle
    Schwartzkopf-Genswein, K. S.
    JOURNAL OF ANIMAL SCIENCE, 2016, 94 : 132 - 132
  • [5] WATER SPRAY COOLING
    BURNS, JM
    AMERICAN CERAMIC SOCIETY BULLETIN, 1971, 50 (04): : 441 - &
  • [6] FACTORS AFFECTING WATER CONSUMPTION BY FEEDLOT CATTLE
    HOFFMAN, MP
    SELF, HL
    JOURNAL OF ANIMAL SCIENCE, 1972, 35 (04) : 871 - &
  • [7] Optimal spray characteristics in water spray cooling
    Chen, RH
    Chow, LC
    Navedo, JE
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HEAT AND MASS TRANSFER, 2004, 47 (23) : 5095 - 5099
  • [8] BEHAVIOR OF FEEDLOT CATTLE DURING 2 SEASONS
    RAY, DE
    ROUBICEK, CB
    JOURNAL OF ANIMAL SCIENCE, 1969, 29 (01) : 116 - &
  • [9] Water spray cooling of polymers
    Tan, S. B.
    Hornsby, P. R.
    McAfee, M. B.
    Kearns, M. P.
    McCourt, M. P.
    POLYMER ENGINEERING AND SCIENCE, 2012, 52 (05): : 1069 - 1080
  • [10] BEHAVIOR OF FEEDLOT CATTLE DURING 2 SEASONS
    RAY, DE
    ROUBICEK, CB
    JOURNAL OF ANIMAL SCIENCE, 1971, 33 (01) : 72 - &