Modelling the effects of cross-sectoral water allocation schemes in Europe

被引:0
|
作者
Florian Wimmer
Eric Audsley
Marcus Malsy
Cristina Savin
Robert Dunford
Paula A. Harrison
Rüdiger Schaldach
Martina Flörke
机构
[1] University of Kassel,Center for Environmental Systems Research
[2] Cranfield University,Natural Resources Department
[3] TIAMASG Foundation,Environmental Change Institute
[4] Oxford University Centre for the Environment,undefined
来源
Climatic Change | 2015年 / 128卷
关键词
Water Demand; Water Allocation; Impact Indicator; Renewable Water Resource; Water Allocation Scheme;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Future renewable water resources are likely to be insufficient to meet water demand for human use and minimum environmental flow requirements in many European regions. Hence, fair and equitable water allocation to different water use sectors and environmental needs is important for climate change adaptation in order to reduce negative effects on human well-being and aquatic ecosystems. We applied a system of coupled sectoral metamodels of water availability and water use in the domestic, manufacturing industry, electricity generation, and agricultural sectors to simulate the effects of generic water allocation schemes (WAS) at the European level. The relative performance of WAS in balancing adverse impacts on the water use sectors and aquatic ecosystems was analysed for an ensemble of 16 scenarios for the 2050s, which were built from the combination of four socio-economic scenarios, developed in the CLIMSAVE project, and four climate projections based on IPCC A1. The results indicate that significant physical water shortages may result from climate and socio-economic change in many regions of Europe, particularly in the Mediterranean. In the energy sector, average annual water demand can largely be met even in water allocation schemes that deprioritise the sector. However, prioritisation of agricultural water demand has significant adverse impacts on the domestic and manufacturing industry sectors. Cross-sectoral impacts were found to be lowest if at least one of the domestic and manufacturing sectors is assigned higher priority than agriculture. We conclude that adapting spatial patterns of water-intensive activities to renewable water availability across Europe, such as shifting irrigated agriculture to less water-stressed basins, could be an effective demand-side adaptation measure, and thus a candidate for support through EU policy.
引用
收藏
页码:229 / 244
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Modelling the effects of cross-sectoral water allocation schemes in Europe
    Wimmer, Florian
    Audsley, Eric
    Malsy, Marcus
    Savin, Cristina
    Dunford, Robert
    Harrison, Paula A.
    Schaldach, Ruediger
    Floerke, Martina
    [J]. CLIMATIC CHANGE, 2015, 128 (3-4) : 229 - 244
  • [2] Challenges in cross-sectoral marine protection in Europe
    Salomon, Markus
    Dross, Miriam
    [J]. MARINE POLICY, 2013, 42 : 142 - 149
  • [3] Sectoral and cross-sectoral effects of retailing firm demographies
    Marcus Dejardin
    [J]. The Annals of Regional Science, 2004, 38 : 311 - 334
  • [4] Sectoral and cross-sectoral effects of retailing firm demographies
    Dejardin, M
    [J]. ANNALS OF REGIONAL SCIENCE, 2004, 38 (02): : 311 - 334
  • [5] Dynamic Water Electrolysis in Cross-Sectoral Processes
    Seibel, Christopher
    Kuhlmann, Jens-Wilhelm
    [J]. CHEMIE INGENIEUR TECHNIK, 2018, 90 (10) : 1430 - 1436
  • [6] Cross-sectoral process modelling for smart city development
    Dessai, Asmita
    Javidroozi, Vahid
    [J]. BUSINESS PROCESS MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, 2021, 27 (07) : 2051 - 2074
  • [7] Those who want cross-sectoral Care must pay for cross-sectoral support!
    Schroeder, Axel
    [J]. UROLOGE, 2018, 57 (08): : 1007 - 1008
  • [8] Cross-sectoral Circular Care
    Hogsgaard, Ditte
    Wentzer, Helle
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF INTEGRATED CARE, 2022, 22
  • [9] Cross-sectoral Pain Management
    Berwanger, C.
    [J]. SCHMERZ, 2013, 27 (04): : 417 - 417
  • [10] The Goal? A cross-sectoral Supply
    Straub, Christoph
    [J]. Gesundheitsoekonomie und Qualitaetsmanagement, 2016, 21 (05): : 212 - 212