Reproducibility of APT-weighted CEST-MRI at 3T in healthy brain and tumor across sessions and scanners

被引:0
|
作者
Yulun Wu
Tobias C. Wood
Sophie H. A. E. Derks
Ilanah J. Pruis
Sebastian van der Voort
Sophie E. M. Veldhuijzen van Zanten
Marion Smits
Esther A. H. Warnert
机构
[1] Erasmus MC,Department of Radiology & Nuclear Medicine
[2] Brain Tumour Centre,Department of Neuroimaging, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience
[3] Erasmus MC Cancer Institute,Department of Medical Oncology
[4] King’s College London,undefined
[5] Erasmus MC-University Medical Centre Rotterdam,undefined
[6] Medical Delta,undefined
来源
关键词
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Amide proton transfer (APT)-weighted chemical exchange saturation transfer (CEST) imaging is a recent MRI technique making its way into clinical application. In this work, we investigated whether APT-weighted CEST imaging can provide reproducible measurements across scan sessions and scanners. Within-session, between-session and between scanner reproducibility was calculated for 19 healthy volunteers and 7 patients with a brain tumor on two 3T MRI scanners. The APT-weighted CEST effect was evaluated by calculating the Lorentzian Difference (LD), magnetization transfer ratio asymmetry (MTRasym), and relaxation-compensated inverse magnetization transfer ratio (MTRREX) averaged in whole brain white matter (WM), enhancing tumor and necrosis. Within subject coefficient of variation (COV) calculations, Bland–Altman plots and mixed effect modeling were performed to assess the repeatability and reproducibility of averaged values. The group median COVs of LD APT were 0.56% (N = 19), 0.84% (N = 6), 0.80% (N = 9) in WM within-session, between-session and between-scanner respectively. The between-session COV of LD APT in enhancing tumor (N = 6) and necrotic core (N = 3) were 4.57% and 5.67%, respectively. There were no significant differences in within session, between session and between scanner comparisons of the APT effect. The COVs of LD and MTRREX were consistently lower than MTRasym in all experiments, both in healthy tissues and tumor. The repeatability and reproducibility of APT-weighted CEST was clinically acceptable across scan sessions and scanners. Although MTRasym is simple to acquire and compute and sufficient to provide robust measurement, it is beneficial to include LD and MTRREX to obtain higher reproducibility for detecting minor signal difference in different tissue types.
引用
收藏
相关论文
共 36 条
  • [1] Reproducibility of APT-weighted CEST-MRI at 3T in healthy brain and tumor across sessions and scanners
    Wu, Yulun
    Wood, Tobias C.
    Derks, Sophie H. A. E.
    Pruis, Ilanah J.
    van der Voort, Sebastian
    van Zanten, Sophie E. M. Veldhuijzen
    Smits, Marion
    Warnert, Esther A. H.
    [J]. SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2023, 13 (01)
  • [2] Quantitative pulsed CEST-MRI at a clinical 3T MRI system
    Stabinska, Julia
    Cronenberg, Tom
    Wittsack, Hans-Joerg
    Lanzman, Rotem Shlomo
    Mueller-Lutz, Anja
    [J]. MAGNETIC RESONANCE MATERIALS IN PHYSICS BIOLOGY AND MEDICINE, 2017, 30 (05) : 505 - 516
  • [3] Quantitative pulsed CEST-MRI at a clinical 3T MRI system
    Julia Stabinska
    Tom Cronenberg
    Hans-Jörg Wittsack
    Rotem Shlomo Lanzman
    Anja Müller-Lutz
    [J]. Magnetic Resonance Materials in Physics, Biology and Medicine, 2017, 30 : 505 - 516
  • [4] Relaxation-compensated APT and rNOE CEST-MRI of human brain tumors at 3 T
    Goerke, Steffen
    Soehngen, Yannick
    Deshmane, Anagha
    Zaiss, Moritz
    Breitling, Johannes
    Boyd, Philip S.
    Herz, Kai
    Zimmermann, Ferdinand
    Klika, Karel D.
    Schlemmer, Heinz-Peter
    Paech, Daniel
    Ladd, Mark E.
    Bachert, Peter
    [J]. MAGNETIC RESONANCE IN MEDICINE, 2019, 82 (02) : 622 - 632
  • [5] Clinical routine acquisition protocol for 3D relaxation-compensated APT and rNOE CEST-MRI of the human brain at 3T
    Goerke, Steffen
    Breitling, Johannes
    Korzowski, Andreas
    Paech, Daniel
    Zaiss, Moritz
    Schlemmer, Heinz-Peter
    Ladd, Mark E.
    Bachert, Peter
    [J]. MAGNETIC RESONANCE IN MEDICINE, 2021, 86 (01) : 393 - 404
  • [6] Reproducibility of 3 T APT-CEST in Healthy Volunteers and Patients With Brain Glioma
    Wamelink, Ivar J. H. G.
    Kuijer, Joost P. A.
    Padrela, Beatriz E.
    Zhang, Yi
    Barkhof, Frederik
    Mutsaerts, Henk J. M. M.
    Petr, Jan
    van de Giessen, Elsmarieke
    Keil, Vera C.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING, 2023, 57 (01) : 206 - 215
  • [7] Review and consensus recommendations on clinical APT-weighted imaging approaches at 3T: Application to brain tumors
    Zhou, Jinyuan
    Zaiss, Moritz
    Knutsson, Linda
    Sun, Phillip Zhe
    Ahn, Sung Soo
    Aime, Silvio
    Bachert, Peter
    Blakeley, Jaishri O.
    Cai, Kejia
    Chappell, Michael A.
    Chen, Min
    Gochberg, Daniel F.
    Goerke, Steffen
    Heo, Hye-Young
    Jiang, Shanshan
    Jin, Tao
    Kim, Seong-Gi
    Laterra, John
    Paech, Daniel
    Pagel, Mark D.
    Park, Ji Eun
    Reddy, Ravinder
    Sakata, Akihiko
    Sartoretti-Schefer, Sabine
    Sherry, A. Dean
    Smith, Seth A.
    Stanisz, Greg J.
    Sundgren, Pia C.
    Togao, Osamu
    Vandsburger, Moriel
    Wen, Zhibo
    Wu, Yin
    Zhang, Yi
    Zhu, Wenzhen
    Zu, Zhongliang
    van Zijl, Peter C. M.
    [J]. MAGNETIC RESONANCE IN MEDICINE, 2022, 88 (02) : 546 - 574
  • [8] 3D APT and NOE CEST-MRI of healthy volunteers and patients with non-enhancing glioma at 3 T
    Wu, Yulun
    Wood, Tobias Charles
    Arzanforoosh, Fatemeh
    Hernandez-Tamames, Juan Antonio
    Barker, Gareth John
    Smits, Marion
    Warnert, Esther AnneHelena
    [J]. MAGNETIC RESONANCE MATERIALS IN PHYSICS BIOLOGY AND MEDICINE, 2022, 35 (01) : 63 - 73
  • [9] Creatine mapping of the brain at 3T by CEST MRI
    Wang, Kexin
    Huang, Jianpan
    Ju, Licheng
    Xu, Su
    Gullapalli, Rao P.
    Liang, Yajie
    Rogers, Joshua
    Li, Yuguo
    van Zijl, Peter C. M.
    Weiss, Robert G.
    Chan, Kannie W. Y.
    Xu, Jiadi
    [J]. MAGNETIC RESONANCE IN MEDICINE, 2023, 91 (01) : 51 - 60
  • [10] Correction to: 3D APT and NOE CEST-MRI of healthy volunteers and patients with non-enhancing glioma at 3 T
    Yulun Wu
    Tobias C. Wood
    Fatemeh Arzanforoosh
    Juan A. Hernandez-Tamames
    Gareth J. Barker
    Marion Smits
    Esther A. H. Warnert
    [J]. Magnetic Resonance Materials in Physics, Biology and Medicine, 2022, 35 : 75 - 75