The effectiveness of research and development tax incentives in India: a quasi-experimental approach

被引:0
|
作者
Aakanksha Kaushik
机构
[1] Delhi Technological University,University School of Management and Entrepreneurship
关键词
R&D; Tax incentives; Quasi-experiment; Difference-in-differences; H26; H32; O3;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Globally, governments provide significant tax incentives to business enterprises for research and development (R&D) expenditure to foster innovation. Several fiscal incentives are provided to firms registered under India’s department of scientific and industrial research (DSIR). India provided a super deduction of 200% on R&D expenses in 2011, reduced to 150% in 2016 and 100% in 2020. The study uses firm-level data to test the effectiveness of incentives offered in India and analyze the impact of the rationalization of super deduction. For the study, the difference in difference analysis is done to evaluate the changes in the outcome variables: total, current, and capital R&D expenditures. The treatment group is the firms registered under DSIR. The results show a significant impact of the mix of tax incentives provided on both current and capital expenditures. The super deduction significantly impacted only current expenses and not capital expenditures. The administrative costs under current expenditures are easier to relabel than capital expenditures. The study shows that the overly generous regime incentivized firms to relabel their non-R&D costs as R&D expenses for profiteering. The study supports the move to reduce the super deduction.
引用
收藏
页码:2329 / 2336
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] The effectiveness of research and development tax incentives in India: a quasi-experimental approach
    Kaushik, Aakanksha
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SYSTEM ASSURANCE ENGINEERING AND MANAGEMENT, 2023, 14 (06) : 2329 - 2336
  • [2] Effectiveness of Fiscal Incentives for R&D: Quasi-experimental Evidence
    Guceri, Irem
    Liu, Li
    [J]. AMERICAN ECONOMIC JOURNAL-ECONOMIC POLICY, 2019, 11 (01) : 266 - 291
  • [3] STRONG QUASI-EXPERIMENTAL DESIGNS FOR RESEARCH ON THE EFFECTIVENESS OF REHABILITATION
    JOHNSTON, MV
    OTTENBACHER, KJ
    REICHARDT, CS
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL MEDICINE & REHABILITATION, 1995, 74 (05) : 383 - 392
  • [4] Selecting and Improving Quasi-Experimental Designs in Effectiveness and Implementation Research
    Handley, Margaret A.
    Lyles, Courtney R.
    McCulloch, Charles
    Cattamanchi, Adithya
    [J]. ANNUAL REVIEW OF PUBLIC HEALTH, VOL 39, 2018, 39 : 5 - 25
  • [5] Research and Development and Tax Incentives
    Hodzic, Sabina
    [J]. SOUTH EAST EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS AND BUSINESS, 2012, 7 (02) : 51 - 62
  • [6] Quasi-experimental evidence on tobacco tax regressivity
    Koch, Steven F.
    [J]. SOCIAL SCIENCE & MEDICINE, 2018, 196 : 19 - 28
  • [7] Quasi-Experimental Research as An Epistemological-Methodological Approach in Education Research
    Zajic, Jelena S. Osmanovic
    Maksimovic, Jelena Z.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF COGNITIVE RESEARCH IN SCIENCE ENGINEERING AND EDUCATION-IJCRSEE, 2022, 10 (03): : 177 - 183
  • [8] Quasi-Experimental Research Designs
    Siedlecki, Sandra L.
    [J]. CLINICAL NURSE SPECIALIST, 2020, 34 (05) : 198 - 202
  • [9] Quasi-experimental research designs
    Jensen, Niels Rosendal
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF SOCIAL WORK, 2015, 18 (01) : 157 - 159
  • [10] Study design elements for rigorous quasi-experimental comparative effectiveness research
    Maciejewski, Matthew L.
    Curtis, Lesley H.
    Dowd, Bryan
    [J]. JOURNAL OF COMPARATIVE EFFECTIVENESS RESEARCH, 2013, 2 (02) : 159 - 173