Approaches to valuation in LCA impact assessment

被引:1
|
作者
Powell J.C. [1 ]
Pearce D.W. [2 ]
Craighill A.L. [1 ]
机构
[1] CSERGE, University of East Anglia
[2] CSERGE, University College London, London WC1E 6BT, Gower St.
关键词
Environmental damage costs; Impact assessment; Lifecycle assessment; Valuation;
D O I
10.1007/BF02978709
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
One of the major problems with the future development of lifecycle assessment is the difficulty in converting lifecycle inventory results into environmental impacts, owing to problems associated with the interpretation and weighting of the data. The four main valuation approaches: distance-to-target, environmental control costs, environmental damage costs and scoring approaches are assessed and the individual methodologies evaluated. In conclusion it is considered that in a country which has clear, up-to-date, politically acceptable emission standards, a distance-to-target valuation system maybe acceptable. However, these circumstances are likely to be rare, and the choice of standards arbitrary and not scientifically based. Therefore a better choice is probably environmental damage costs, provided suitable economic damage figures are available.
引用
收藏
页码:11 / 15
页数:4
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Impact category ecotoxicity and valuation procedure: Ecotoxicological impact assessment and the valuation step within LCA - Pragmatic approaches
    Fraunhofer-Inst. F. Systemtechnik/I., Breslauer Str. 48, D-76139 Karlsruhe, Germany
    不详
    Int. J. Life Cycle Assess., 4 (193-198):
  • [2] Uncertainty in LCA case study due to allocation approaches and life cycle impact assessment methods
    Cherubini, Edivan
    Franco, Davide
    Zanghelini, Guilherme Marcelo
    Soares, Sebastiao Roberto
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LIFE CYCLE ASSESSMENT, 2018, 23 (10): : 2055 - 2070
  • [3] Uncertainty in LCA case study due to allocation approaches and life cycle impact assessment methods
    Edivan Cherubini
    Davide Franco
    Guilherme Marcelo Zanghelini
    Sebastião Roberto Soares
    The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 2018, 23 : 2055 - 2070
  • [4] A fuzzy logic approach for the impact assessment in LCA
    González, B
    Adenso-Díaz, B
    González-Torre, PL
    RESOURCES CONSERVATION AND RECYCLING, 2002, 37 (01) : 61 - 79
  • [5] The technical feasibility of LCA impact assessment.
    Owens, JW
    1996 TAPPI LIFE CYCLE ASSESSMENT SYMPOSIUM, 1996, : 155 - 193
  • [6] Evaluation of the LCA approaches for the assessment of embodied energy of building products
    Ciravoǧlu, A. (aysenc@gmail.com), 1600, Springer Science and Business Media Deutschland GmbH (22):
  • [7] Influence of impact assessment methods in wastewater treatment LCA
    Renou, S.
    Thomas, J. S.
    Aoustin, E.
    Pons, M. N.
    JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2008, 16 (10) : 1098 - 1105
  • [8] LCA impact assessment categories technical feasibility and accuracy
    William Owens, J.
    International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 1996, 1 (03): : 151 - 158
  • [9] Social impact assessment in LCA using the Preston pathway
    Feschet, Pauline
    Macombe, Catherine
    Garrabe, Michel
    Loeillet, Denis
    Saez, Adolfo Rolo
    Benhmad, Francois
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LIFE CYCLE ASSESSMENT, 2013, 18 (02): : 490 - 503
  • [10] Dynamic LCA framework for environmental impact assessment of buildings
    Su, Shu
    Li, Xiaodong
    Zhu, Yimin
    Lin, Borong
    ENERGY AND BUILDINGS, 2017, 149 : 310 - 320