Sustainable smart product-service systems: a causal logic framework for impact design

被引:0
|
作者
Ries L. [1 ]
Beckmann M. [1 ]
Wehnert P. [1 ]
机构
[1] Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Chair for Corporate Sustainability Management, Findelgasse 7, Nuremberg
关键词
Business model; Logic model; Morphological box; Product-service system; Smart technology; Sustainability; Theory of change;
D O I
10.1007/s11573-023-01154-8
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Digital technologies can elevate product-service systems (PSS) to smart PSS, which focus on performance rather than ownership and are considered a means for dematerialization. However, transitioning to smart PSS does not guarantee sustainability. To understand the impact of smart PSS holistically, we take a two-pronged approach. First, we use the theory of change to conceptualize the causal link between sustainable smart PSS and their ultimate impact. We develop a three-step causal logic framework consisting of design, causation, and impact. Within this framework, we identify the business model properties of sustainable smart PSS as design characteristics and categorize the eventual impacts based on the triple bottom line. We introduce the term multi-causal pathway to describe the causation processes underlining the possibility of non-linearity and multi-causality. Second, we conduct a systematic literature review to investigate the mechanisms linking design and impact. Based on an analysis of 63 publications, we identify 17 specific mechanisms and group them into four types: information, resource, empowerment, and adverse mechanisms. Visualizing our results, we develop a morphological box as a toolkit for managers to develop their own impact-oriented logic model by identifying and activating the multi-causal pathway that fosters the desired sustainability effects. Moreover, discussing our framework, we develop research propositions and managerial questions for impact design. By linking the theory of change with the business model impact, we contribute toward a conceptual synthesis for understanding the impact of (sustainable) smart PSS. © 2023, The Author(s).
引用
收藏
页码:667 / 706
页数:39
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Simulating Impact of Smart Product-Service Systems
    Zinke-Wehlmann, Christian
    Frericks, Sebastian
    Kluge, Andreas
    [J]. SMART AND SUSTAINABLE COLLABORATIVE NETWORKS 4.0 (PRO-VE 2021), 2021, 629 : 289 - 297
  • [2] A framework for sustainable value propositions in product-service systems
    Kristensen, Heidi Simone
    Remmen, Arne
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2019, 223 : 25 - 35
  • [3] A data-driven reversible framework for achieving Sustainable Smart product-service systems
    Li, Xinyu
    Wang, Zuoxu
    Chen, Chun-Hsien
    Zheng, Pai
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2021, 279
  • [4] Sustainable product-service systems
    Roy, R
    [J]. FUTURES, 2000, 32 (3-4) : 289 - 299
  • [6] A systematic design approach for service innovation of smart product-service systems
    Zheng, Pai
    Lin, Tzu-Jui
    Chen, Chun-Hsien
    Xu, Xun
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2018, 201 : 657 - 667
  • [7] The Design of Smart Product-Service Systems (PSSs): An Exploration of Design Characteristics
    Valencia, Ana
    Mugge, Ruth
    Schoormans, Jan P. L.
    Schifferstein, Hendrik N. J.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF DESIGN, 2015, 9 (01): : 13 - 28
  • [8] A fuzzy logic assessment framework for collaborative development of product-service systems
    Harrat, Mourad
    Belkadi, Farouk
    Caverot, Guy
    Bernard, Alain
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF VALUE CHAIN MANAGEMENT, 2023, 14 (02) : 143 - 167
  • [9] A TOGAF-based Framework for the Development of Sustainable Product-Service Systems
    de Oliveira, Kaio Vasconcelos
    Fernandes, Ederson Carvalhar
    Borsato, Milton
    [J]. FAIM 2021, 2021, 55 : 274 - 281
  • [10] A Human Centered Design Framework to Support Product-service Systems
    Wong, T. C. H.
    Jang, M. K.
    Moon, S. K.
    Chua, Z. Y.
    Zhang, H.
    Oh, H. S.
    [J]. 2018 IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON INDUSTRIAL ENGINEERING AND ENGINEERING MANAGEMENT (IEEE IEEM), 2018, : 545 - 549