Gendered impacts of greenhouse gas mitigation options for rice cultivation in India

被引:0
|
作者
Hom Gartaula
Tek B Sapkota
Arun Khatri-Chhetri
Gokul Prasad
Lone Badstue
机构
[1] International Maize and Wheat Improvement Centre (CIMMYT),
[2] International Maize and Wheat Improvement Centre (CIMMYT),undefined
[3] International Center of Tropical Agriculture (CIAT),undefined
[4] Thünen Institute of Climate-Smart Agriculture,undefined
来源
Climatic Change | 2020年 / 163卷
关键词
Climate change; Gender-responsive mitigation; Co-benefits; Rice cultivation; India;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
The nexus of gender-agriculture-emissions reduction is one of the least explored areas related to agriculture and climate change. This nexus plays an important role in the areas where women’s participation in agriculture is high, and the contribution of the agricultural sector to total emission is significant. This study generates evidence on women’s labor contribution in rice cultivation and potential reduction of their labor drudgery, including GHG mitigation co-benefits with the adoption of direct seeding and machine transplanting technologies. Using a large number of plot-level data (11,987 data points) from the rice-growing regions of India, the study shows that changing rice production technology from conventional to direct-seeded rice (DSR) and/or machine-transplanted rice (MTR) offers huge potential to reduce women’s labor in rice planting (745 million labor-days for DSR and 610 million labor-days for MTR) and greenhouse gases (GHG) emission (34 MtCO2e for DSR and 7 MtCO2e for MTR) at the same time. This potential differs from the agro-ecological region, the level of input use, and women’s involvement in rice cultivation. The realization of this gender-responsive GHG mitigation strategy depends on the adoption of these technologies, which rely on several social, economic, and political factors. At the same time, the immense potential for negative implications for some specific groups should not be ignored, but focused on addressing and mitigating those challenges.
引用
收藏
页码:1045 / 1063
页数:18
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Gendered impacts of greenhouse gas mitigation options for rice cultivation in India
    Gartaula, Hom
    Sapkota, Tek
    Khatri-Chhetri, Arun
    Prasad, Gokul
    Badstue, Lone
    CLIMATIC CHANGE, 2020, 163 (02) : 1045 - 1063
  • [2] Correction to: Gendered impacts of greenhouse gas mitigation options for rice cultivation in India
    Hom Gartaula
    Tek B. Sapkota
    Arun Khatri-Chhetri
    Gokul Prasad
    Lone Badstue
    Climatic Change, 2020, 163 : 2261 - 2261
  • [3] Gendered impacts of greenhouse gas mitigation options for rice cultivation in India (vol 163, pg 1045, 2020)
    Gartaula, Hom
    Sapkota, Tek B.
    Khatri-Chhetri, Arun
    Prasad, Gokul
    Badstue, Lone
    CLIMATIC CHANGE, 2020, 163 (04) : 2261 - 2261
  • [4] The modelling of policy options for greenhouse gas mitigation in India
    Shukla, PR
    AMBIO, 1996, 25 (04) : 240 - 248
  • [5] A comparison of greenhouse gas mitigation options
    Reck, RA
    Hoag, KJ
    ENERGY, 1997, 22 (2-3) : 115 - 120
  • [6] Greenhouse gas mitigation: Policy options
    Lowe, I
    ENERGY CONVERSION AND MANAGEMENT, 1996, 37 (6-8) : 741 - 746
  • [7] Energy conservation and greenhouse gas mitigation under different production systems in rice cultivation
    Chaudhary, V. P.
    Singh, K. K.
    Pratibha, G.
    Bhattacharyya, Ranjan
    Shamim, M.
    Srinivas, I.
    Patel, Anurag
    ENERGY, 2017, 130 : 307 - 317
  • [8] Canadian greenhouse gas mitigation options in agriculture
    Desjardins, RL
    Kulshreshtha, SN
    Junkins, B
    Smith, W
    Grant, B
    Boehm, M
    NUTRIENT CYCLING IN AGROECOSYSTEMS, 2001, 60 (1-3) : 317 - 326
  • [9] Selection of appropriate greenhouse gas mitigation options
    Ramanathan, R
    GLOBAL ENVIRONMENTAL CHANGE-HUMAN AND POLICY DIMENSIONS, 1999, 9 (03): : 203 - 210
  • [10] Canadian greenhouse gas mitigation options in agriculture
    R.L. Desjardins
    S.N. Kulshreshtha
    B. Junkins
    W. Smith
    B. Grant
    M. Boehm
    Nutrient Cycling in Agroecosystems, 2001, 60 : 317 - 326