Physiological and Biochemical Responses of Forage Grass Varieties to Mild Drought Stress Under Field Conditions

被引:0
|
作者
A. Fariaszewska
J. Aper
J. Van Huylenbroeck
T. De Swaef
J. Baert
Ł. Pecio
机构
[1] Institute of Soil Science and Plant Cultivation-State Research Institute (IUNG),Department of Forage Crop Production
[2] Research Institute for Agriculture,Plant Sciences Unit
[3] Fisheries and Food (ILVO),Department of Biochemistry and Food Quality
[4] Institute of Soil Science and Plant Cultivation-State Research Institute,undefined
关键词
Drought stress; Forage grasses; Rain-out shelter; Photosynthesis; Proline; Phenolic compounds;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
In view of the expected increase in drought periods, researchers and breeders are searching for forage grasses that are more tolerant to drought stress. This study wanted to examine the physiological and biochemical reactions of nine forage grass varieties belonging to Festuca, Lolium and Festulolium under mild drought stress conditions in a semi-controlled field experiment. A mild drought stress treatment was applied in the period between cut II and cut III using three large mobile rain-out shelters equipped with sprinkler irrigation systems. The experiment consisted of two soil moisture treatments: (1) control where a soil moisture level of around 20% v/v was maintained and (2) drought stress where the soil moisture level decreased to 7.5% v/v. The experiment was cut 5 times in 2014 and 4 times in 2015. A total of nine varieties from five species of forage grasses were evaluated: L. perenne, L. multiflorum, F. pratensis, F. arundinacea and F. braunii. Dry matter yield, gas exchange parameters and chlorophyll fluorescence were significantly lower in drought stress than under control conditions and the physiological parameters reacted within 2 weeks after the start of the drought treatment in all species. In contrast, drought stress significantly increased water use efficiency, the content of proline, phenolic acids, flavonoids, water soluble carbohydrates and decreased neutral and acid detergent fibre on both years. Based on total dry matter yield and tolerance indices the most drought tolerant species were L. multiflorum in the first and F. arundinacea in the second investigated year.
引用
收藏
页码:335 / 353
页数:18
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Physiological and Biochemical Responses of Forage Grass Varieties to Mild Drought Stress Under Field Conditions
    Fariaszewska, A.
    Aper, J.
    Van Huylenbroeck, J.
    De Swaef, T.
    Baert, J.
    Pecio, L.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PLANT PRODUCTION, 2020, 14 (02) : 335 - 353
  • [2] Physiological and biochemical responses of durum wheat under mild terminal drought stress
    Khamssi, Nahid Niari
    Najaphy, Abdollah
    [J]. CELLULAR AND MOLECULAR BIOLOGY, 2018, 64 (04) : 59 - 63
  • [3] Physiological and Biochemical Responses of Commercial Strawberry Cultivars under Optimal and Drought Stress Conditions
    Zahedi, Seyed Morteza
    Hosseini, Marjan Sadat
    Fahadi Hoveizeh, Narjes
    Kadkhodaei, Saeid
    Vaculik, Marek
    [J]. PLANTS-BASEL, 2023, 12 (03):
  • [4] Physiological Responses to Drought of Turfgrass Species Under Field Conditions
    Leksungnoen, Nisa
    Johnson, Paul G.
    Kjelgren, Roger
    [J]. HORTSCIENCE, 2009, 44 (04) : 1170 - 1171
  • [5] Physiological and biochemical responses of cowpea genotypes to water stress under glasshouse and field conditions
    Hamidou, F.
    Zombre, G.
    Braconnier, S.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF AGRONOMY AND CROP SCIENCE, 2007, 193 (04) : 229 - 237
  • [6] Differential characterization of physiological and biochemical responses during drought stress in finger millet varieties
    Asunta Mukami
    Alex Ngetich
    Cecilia Mweu
    Richard O. Oduor
    Mutemi Muthangya
    Wilton Mwema Mbinda
    [J]. Physiology and Molecular Biology of Plants, 2019, 25 : 837 - 846
  • [7] Differential characterization of physiological and biochemical responses during drought stress in finger millet varieties
    Mukami, Asunta
    Ngetich, Alex
    Mweu, Cecilia
    Oduor, Richard O.
    Muthangya, Mutemi
    Mbinda, Wilton Mwema
    [J]. PHYSIOLOGY AND MOLECULAR BIOLOGY OF PLANTS, 2019, 25 (04) : 837 - 846
  • [8] Physiological responses of two halophytic grass species under drought stress environment
    Siddiqui, Zamin Shaheed
    Shahid, Huda
    Cho, Jung-Il
    Park, Sung-Han
    Ryu, Tae-Hun
    Park, Soo-Chul
    [J]. ACTA BOTANICA CROATICA, 2016, 75 (01) : 31 - 38
  • [9] Physiological and biochemical responses of sorghum to drought stress
    Goche, T.
    Chivasa, S.
    Ngara, R.
    [J]. SOUTH AFRICAN JOURNAL OF BOTANY, 2017, 109 : 336 - 336
  • [10] Physiological and Biochemical Responses of Medicagotruncatula to Drought Stress
    Hegab, M. M.
    [J]. EGYPTIAN JOURNAL OF BOTANY, 2016, 56 (03): : 895 - 912