Unusual allometry for sexual size dimorphism in a cichlid where males are extremely larger than females

被引:0
|
作者
Kazutaka Ota
Masanori Kohda
Tetsu Sato
机构
[1] Kyoto University,Department of Zoology
[2] Osaka City University,Department of Biology and Geosciences
[3] Nagano University,Faculty of Tourism and Environmental Studies
来源
Journal of Biosciences | 2010年 / 35卷
关键词
Phenotypic plasticity; sexual selection; shell-brooding; shell size;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
When males are the larger sex, a positive allometric relationship between male and female sizes is often found across populations of a single species (i.e. Rensch’s rule). This pattern is typically explained by a sexual selection pressure on males. Here, we report that the allometric relationship was negative across populations of a shell-brooding cichlid fish Lamprologus callipterus, although males are extremely larger than females. Male L. callipterus collect and defend empty snail shells in each of which a female breeds. We found that, across six populations, male and female sizes are positively correlated with not only sexual and fecundity selection indices, but also with shell sizes. Given their different reproductive behaviours, these correlations mean that males are required to be more powerful, and thus larger, to transport larger shells, while female bodies are reduced to the shell size to enable them to enter the shells. Among the three size selections (sexual selection, fecundity selection and shell size), shell size explained the allometry, suggesting that females are more strongly subject to size selection associated with shell size availability than males. However, the allometry was violated when considering an additional population where size-selection regimes of males differed from that of other populations. Therefore, sexual size allometry will be violated by body size divergence induced by multiple selection regimes.
引用
收藏
页码:257 / 265
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Unusual allometry for sexual size dimorphism in a cichlid where males are extremely larger than females
    Ota, Kazutaka
    Kohda, Masanori
    Sato, Tetsu
    JOURNAL OF BIOSCIENCES, 2010, 35 (02) : 257 - 265
  • [2] REVERSED SEXUAL SIZE DIMORPHISM IN MICROTINES - ARE FEMALES LARGER THAN MALES OR ARE MALES SMALLER THAN FEMALES
    BONDRUPNIELSEN, S
    IMS, RA
    EVOLUTIONARY ECOLOGY, 1990, 4 (03) : 261 - 272
  • [3] Reduced sexual size dimorphism in a pipefish population where males do not prefer larger females
    Cunha, Mario
    Macedo, Nidia
    Wilson, Jonathan
    Rosenqvist, Gunilla
    Berglund, Anders
    Monteiro, Nuno
    ECOLOGY AND EVOLUTION, 2019, 9 (22): : 12826 - 12835
  • [4] Allometry for sexual size dimorphism: Pattern and process in the coevolution of body size in males and females
    Fairbairn, DJ
    ANNUAL REVIEW OF ECOLOGY AND SYSTEMATICS, 1997, 28 : 659 - 687
  • [5] Female hatchling American kestrels have a larger hippocampus than males: A link with sexual size dimorphism?
    Guigueno, Melanie F.
    Karouna-Renier, Natalie K.
    Henry, Paula F. P.
    Head, Jessica A.
    Peters, Lisa E.
    Palace, Vince P.
    Letcher, Robert J.
    Fernie, Kim J.
    BEHAVIOURAL BRAIN RESEARCH, 2018, 349 : 98 - 101
  • [6] Allometry of Sexual Size Dimorphism in Domestic Dog
    Frynta, Daniel
    Baudysova, Jana
    Hradcova, Petra
    Faltusova, Katerina
    Kratochvil, Lukas
    PLOS ONE, 2012, 7 (09):
  • [7] Size-Dependent Selective Mechanisms on Males and Females and the Evolution of Sexual Size Dimorphism in Frogs
    Nali, Renato C.
    Zamudio, Kelly R.
    Haddad, Celio F. B.
    Prado, Cynthia P. A.
    AMERICAN NATURALIST, 2014, 184 (06): : 727 - 740
  • [8] SEXUAL SIZE DIMORPHISM AND EGG-SIZE ALLOMETRY IN BIRDS
    WEATHERHEAD, PJ
    TEATHER, KL
    EVOLUTION, 1994, 48 (03) : 671 - 678
  • [9] The Ontogeny of Sexual Size Dimorphism of a Moth: When Do Males and Females Grow Apart?
    Stillwell, R. Craig
    Daws, Andrew
    Davidowitz, Goggy
    PLOS ONE, 2014, 9 (09):
  • [10] Sexual size dimorphism and its allometry in Chinese lizards
    Tao Liang
    Lei Shi
    Godfred Bempah
    Chang-hu Lu
    Evolutionary Ecology, 2021, 35 : 323 - 335